Go Forward - Judgment Search Results

Forward Seamen Union of India Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

recruitment and placement services agencies. In these circumstances, the Central Government, while making the rules, if not already made, shall specifically

Oberai Forwarding Agency Vs. New India Assurance Co. Ltd. and anr.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR2000SC855; 2000(4)ALLMR(SC)579; 2000(1)ALT26(SC); 2000(2)BLJR991; (2001)1CALLT9(SC); [2000]100CompCas591(SC); 2000(1)CTC556; JT2000(1)SC508; (2000)IIMLJ95(SC); 2000(3)MP

respondent, through its agent, hired two trucks from M/s. Bhasin Goods Carriers of Bareilly to transport broken rice to Barpeta, Assam. … the first respondent, on the other hand, it was Oberai Forwarding Agency v. New India Assurance Co. Ltd. S.C. 857 submitted

Raghu Forwarding Agency and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: JT2002(8)SC340; (2003)12SCC272

moved.5. The division bench of the High Court did not go into the merits of the appeal. Treating the appeal to

Forward Construction Co. and ors. Vs. Prabhat Mandal (Regd.), Andheri ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1986SC391; (1986)88BOMLR128; 1985(2)SCALE1123; (1986)1SCC100A; [1985]Supp3SCR766; 1986(1)LC167(SC)

ignorant or socially and economically in disadvantaged position, should not go unnoticed, unredressed for that would be destructive of the rule … to the said advertisement in the newspapers, notices were also forwarded to 22 well-known builders out of whom 12 builders purchased

Raghu Forwarding Agency and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court: Guwahati

charges of Rs. 9,50,114.00 recovered from them for allegedly carrying goods in the Wagons beyond permissible capacity (ii) not to claim

Forward Financial Services Ltd. Vs. Primus Chemicals Ltd.

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 2009(2)BomCR495

would imply that they remained in India and did not go abroad. It will also imply that they were busy with

Kishan Freight Forwarders Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court: Delhi

this. The CPLP itself had the force of law and governed all contracts of lease entered into by the Railways. He … the CPLP and Clause 18.1. As regards M/s. Kishan Freight Forwarders [the Petitioner in W.P. (C) Nos. 7289 of 2010, 7290

Ups Worldwide Forwarding Inc. Vs. Ups Jetair Express Private Limited a ...

Court: Mumbai

M.S. Sanklecha, J. RULE, returnable forthwith and by consent of the parties, taken up for final disposal. 2 By this...

Hari Om Forwarding Vs. Radhey Shyam and anr.

Court: Delhi

on truck bearing No.JH-01-AA/0359 the right hand of the respondent got trapped in the dala/flap of the truck resulting in three … DELHI + FAO No.62/2014 3rd March, 2014 % HARI OM FORWARDING Through: ..... Appellant Mr. Nishant Anand, Advocate. Versus RADHEY SHYAM

Toll Global Forwarding (India) Pvt Ltd Vs. Amrit Impex Pvt Ltd and anr ...

Court: Kolkata

buyer being the respondent no.2. The respondent no.1 sold the goods to the respondent no.2 and handed over the consignment to … COURT AT CALCUTTA Civil Appellate Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE TOLL GLOBAL FORWARDING (INDIA) PVT LTD Versus AMRIT IMPEX PVT LTD & ANR.