Function - Judgment Search Results

Smt. Indira Nehru Gandhi Vs. Shri Raj NaraIn and anr.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1975SC2299; 1975(Supp)SCC1; [1976]2SCR347

..... decide private disputes in the instant case the constituent assembly has transgressed its constituent function by adjudicating upon a private dispute iv democracy is an essential feature of the constitution ..... fields acquired an expertise which makes them competent to discharge their duly appointed functions the moghal emperor jehangir was applauded as a reformist because soon after his accession to .....

imbler Vs. Pachtman

Court: US Supreme Court

..... vigorous and fearless performance of the prosecutor s duty that is essential to the proper functioning of the criminal justice system and would often prejudice criminal defendants by skewing post ..... for damages cf american bar association project on standards for criminal justice prosecution and defense function 3 9 c approved draft 1971 footnote 25 the possibility of personal iiability also .....

United States Vs. Feola

Court: US Supreme Court

..... basis for federal jurisdiction but where congress seeks to protect the integrity of federal functions and the safety of federal officers the interest is sufficient to warrant federal involvement ..... aggravated assault statute analogous to the many state statutes which protect the persons and functions of state officers against assault or whether congress intended merely to federalize every assault .....

The Union Territory of Pondicherry, Represented by the Chief Secretary ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: (1976)2MLJ297

..... excessive delegation abdication means total surrender or transfer by the legislature of its legislative functions to another body to legislate on a particular subject matter within its legislative competence ..... or abdication is illustrated by shamarao v union territory 1967 2scr650 what is legislative function will depend upon the particular subject matter of legislation there is no abdication .....

The Registrar of Trade Unions, Union Territory of Pondicherry Vs. the ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: (1975)2MLJ347

..... as regal or sovereign activity were outside the scope of industry because those are functions which a constitutional government can and must undertake for governance and which no private ..... pondicherry had exclusively and without joining hands with the civil service exercising sovereign and regal functions formed an association the division bench would have regarded them a workmen within the .....

Withrow Vs. Larkin

Court: US Supreme Court

..... party before him footnote 15 the contention that the combination of investigative and adjudicative functions necessarily creates an unconstitutional risk of bias in administrative adjudication has a much more ..... the question of the constitutionality of combining in one agency both investigative and adjudicative functions in the same proceeding was raised but did not require answering in gibson v .....

Paul Vs. Sales Tax Officer

Court: Kerala

Reported in: [1976]37STC330(Ker)

..... exposes any person to any punishment or penalty or detention in custody pending investigation such functions should be exercised only by a judicial magistrate it was pointed out that the question ..... code of criminal procedure such proceedings are mere recovery proceedings and the magistrate does not function or exercise his authority under the code of criminal procedure though the procedure for the .....

Manohar Shamrao Singanapure and anr. Vs. Balkrishna Dattatrya Deshpand ...

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: AIR1976Bom105; 1975MhLJ816

..... however this expression also is invariably used to distinguish specially assigned statutory functions from the ordinary functions of the officer in question and to emphasis their immunity from administrative ..... in which such officers are required to discharge their official ministerial and judicial functions as also the practice and procedure integrally and incidentally connected with these offices .....

Kerala State Electricity Board Vs. the Indian Aluminium Co. Ltd.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1976SC1031; (1976)1SCC466; [1976]1SCR552

..... in industrial areas and industrial estates in the state of maharashtra broadly stated the functions and powers of the corporation are to develop industrial areas and industrial estates by ..... electricity boards are not trading corporations they are public service corporations they have to function without any profit motive their duty is to promote coordinated development of the generation .....

Meek Vs. Pittenger

Court: US Supreme Court

..... facilities secular and non ideological services unrelated to the primary religion oriented educational function of the sectarian school the indirect and incidental benefits to church related ..... necessary to ensure that auxiliary services personnel remain strictly neutral and nonideological when functioning in church related schools compels the conclusion that act 194 violates the constitutional .....