Skip to content


Function - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: function Year: 1950 Page 1 of about 188 results (0.024 seconds)
Apr 17 1950 (HC)

Hazarimal Vs. the State and ors.

Court: Rajasthan

Decided on: Apr-17-1950

Reported in: 1950CriLJ1601

orderoak j c 1 this is a reference by the learned sessions judge ajmer merwara recommending that an order under...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 06 1950 (HC)

Hanumanthaiya Vs. Thavakal San and anr.

Court: Karnataka

Decided on: Jan-06-1950

Reported in: AIR1950Kant9; AIR1950Mys9

..... by way of tax under article 265 in exercise of executive functions under article 162 of constitution it is illegal being without authority ..... articles 265 and entry 49 list ii in exercise of executive function under article 162 of the constitution of india in respect of ..... article 265 and entry 49 list ii in exercise of executive function under article 162 of the constitution of india in respect of .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 07 1950 (HC)

In Re: D.V. Gundappa and ors.

Court: Karnataka

Decided on: Jul-07-1950

Reported in: AIR1951Kant6; AIR1951Mys6

..... by way of tax under article 265 in exercise of executive functions under article 162 of constitution it is illegal being without authority ..... articles 265 and entry 49 list ii in exercise of executive function under article 162 of the constitution of india in respect of ..... article 265 and entry 49 list ii in exercise of executive function under article 162 of the constitution of india in respect of .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 11 1950 (HC)

Moti Lal and ors. Vs. the Government of the State of Uttar Pradesh and ...

Court: Allahabad

Decided on: May-11-1950

Reported in: AIR1951All257

..... writ of certiorari is also issued against a body performing judicial or quasi judicial functions either for the purpose of transferring proceedings pending before it or for quashing orders of ..... courts 422 it is true that the executive performs certain functions without express authorisation by specific enactment these functions are functions which are necessary for the very purpose of its existence .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Feb 20 1950 (FN)

Wong Yang Sung Vs. Mcgrath

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Feb-20-1950

..... go so far as to require a complete separation of investigating and prosecuting functions from adjudicating functions but that the safeguards it did set up were intended to ameliorate the ..... president roosevelt s committee on administrative management in 1937 recommended complete separation of adjudicating functions and personnel from those having to do with investigation or prosecution footnote 8 the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 31 1950 (HC)

Amir Khan Vs. State

Court: Allahabad

Decided on: Jan-31-1950

Reported in: AIR1950All423

..... either conditionally or unconditionally to that government or ruler or to their respective officers functions in relation to any matter to which the executive authority of the federation extends ..... 1 government of india act under that section the central government could delegate its functions to the provincial government with the consent of that government the notifications therefore issued .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Feb 06 1950 (FN)

United States Vs. Morton Salt

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Feb-06-1950

..... continued or renewed unlawful practice this case illustrates the difference between the judicial function and the function the commission is attempting to perform the respondents argue that since the commission ..... satisfy itself that the decree is being observed whether this usurps the courts own function is we think answered by consideration of the fundamental relationship between the courts and .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 02 1950 (HC)

R.N. Seth Vs. Girja Shanker Srivastava

Court: Allahabad

Decided on: Mar-02-1950

Reported in: AIR1952All819

..... officer authorised by the district magistrate to perform any of his functions under this act no doubt this is a somewhat unusual ..... lucknow was empowered by the district magistrate lucknow to perform his functions under section 3 of the act the learned district judge ..... officer authorised by the district magistrate to perform any of his functions under the act it would thus appear that the district .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Feb 10 1950 (HC)

Chunnilal Kasturchand Vs. Dundappa Damappa

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Feb-10-1950

Reported in: AIR1951Bom190; (1950)52BOMLR660; ILR1950Bom640

..... the territory of the jamkhandi state all the courts tribunals authorities and bodies which were functioning till the date of the agreement of merger as constituted or recognised by the jamkhandi ..... a foreign state the authority of the state having lapsed and the courts functioning therein having continued to function under the superintendence of the high court at bombay for all purposes the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 19 1950 (HC)

Ram Kishan Vs. State

Court: Allahabad

Decided on: May-19-1950

Reported in: AIR1951All181

..... to some subordinate or administrative agency the line of demarcation between those essential legislative functions which must be exercised by the legislature itself those of an administrative nature or ..... is admitted on all hands that it has undoubtedly unrestricted power to delegate legislative function that it may enact conditional legislation as well as legislation entrusting to subordinate bodies .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.

Sign-up to get more results

Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.

Start Free Trial

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //