Fructify - Judgment Search Results

Vinay Kumar Singh, Vs. the State of Bihar and ors.

Court: Patna

..... be relied upon on the appointed day is itself nebulous of temporary nature awaiting to fructify matters shall be different on the own showing of the petitioners the earlier seniority list ..... on that basis was tentative the word tentative itself visualizes a temporary status awaiting to fructify the fructification took place when the seniority list was finalized nothing new happened this finalized .....

Shri N.S. Bhatnagar Vs. India Tourism Development Corporation

Court: Delhi

Reported in: 151(2008)DLT136; 2008(103)DRJ240; [2008(118)FLR719]; (2008)IIILLJ517Del

..... had reneged on the said promise after the year 1989 when the said promise had fructified and became enforceable looking to the latter issue it cannot be said that the cause ..... termination in case the management is found to have reneged on its promise after it fructified would necessarily have to be examined while determining the relief to be granted to him .....

Sethi Auto Service Station and anr. Vs. Delhi Development Authority an ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR2009SC904; (2009)5MLJ1464(SC); 2008(13)SCALE783; (2009)1SCC180

..... find it difficult to hold that the recommendation of the technical committee of the dda fructified into an order conferring legal right upon the appellants we may note that during the ..... state level co ordinator oil industry and the technical committee but these did not ultimately fructify into an order or decision of the dda conferring any legal rights upon the appellants .....

Assam Roller Flour Mills Association and ors. Vs. State of Assam and o ...

Court: Guwahati

..... or purchase comprehended therein the legal fictions according to the board are in tended to fructify the legislative intention and thus are unassailable referring to section 23 of the model act ..... attain the same being allowable the significance and essentiality of a legal fiction being to fructify some legislative end it ought to be permitted a full play subject to the restraint .....

illa Roy Chowdhury Vs. Shyamali Das and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR2008SC2903; 2008(4)AWC3446(SC); (SCSuppl)2008(4)CHN160; 2008(5)CTC656; [2008(3)JCR65(SC)]; JT2008(11)SC39; 2008(8)SCALE371; 2008AIRSCW4783; AIR2008SC2903; 2008(3)LH(SC)1864

..... the first respondent to get herself impleaded as party in the reference petition did not fructify the said order attained finality it does not appear that the said respondent was not .....

N. Bhoopathy and ors. Vs. Srinivasa Naicker (Died) and ors.

Court: Chennai

Reported in: 2008(5)CTC673

..... three years after the death of the father when the plaintiff s right to possession fructify it was filed within time 3 against that the first defendant filed second appeal no .....

Tribal Co-operative Marketing Development Federation of India Vs. Sidd ...

Court: Delhi

Reported in: 149(2008)DLT723; 2008(101)DRJ540; [2008(118)FLR45]; (2008)IIILLJ883Del

..... cannot be said to be an offer which on the acceptance by the employee would fructify in a concluded contract 66 the proposal of the employee when accepted by the bank .....

Smt. Kamla Devi Vs. Ram Kishan and ors.

Court: Himachal Pradesh

Reported in: 2008ACJ2563,2008(1)ShimLC437

..... has to be in the negative the petitioner having exercised her option which option has fructified into a legal and binding award cannot now be permited to retract and convert the .....

Sagar Machhua Sahakari Samiti Vs. Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panc ...

Court: Madhya Pradesh

Reported in: 2008(1)MPHT254

..... in an appeal or revision the gram panchayat functions by passing resolutions which eventually may fructify and become orders but there cannot be denial of the fact that a resolution is .....

D. Muni Raju Vs. Commissioner of Social Welfare Department, Govt. of A ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 2008(6)ALD19; 2009(1)ALT205

..... by the competent authority of the center to appoint the petitioner as typist did not fructify inasmuch as the 1st respondent did not approve it this court took the subsequent developments .....