Fructify - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: fructify Year: 1965 Page 1 of about 6 results (0.003 seconds)Gajanan Vishwanath Ketkar Vs. the State
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Jul-21-1965
Reported in: AIR1967Bom96; (1966)68BOMLR321; 1967CriLJ427; ILR1966Bom839
..... gandhi and if so whether he had taken any steps in preventing the same being fructified by communicating the information which he had at his disposal it is possible that if .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBhogilal Laxmichand Vs. the State of Gujarat
Court: Gujarat
Decided on: Oct-15-1965
Reported in: [1966]18STC141(Guj)
..... of sale in the sense that it contemplated an eventual sale the element of sale fructified when the option was exercised by the intending purchaser after fulfilling the terms of the .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCommissioner of Income-tax, Madras Vs. M. V. Murugappan and Others. Co ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Nov-18-1965
Reported in: [1966]62ITR382(Mad)
..... can be no distribution to the shareholders out of a mere right which had not fructified into an actual refund for the assessees our attention is drawn to girdhardas and co .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMonthly Rated Workmen of Peiree Leslie and Co. Ltd. Vs. the Labour Com ...
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Nov-23-1965
Reported in: AIR1966Ker204; [1967(14)FLR258]
..... basis of the charter of demands submitted by the petitioner but that proceeding did not fructify for the reason that it was found that the petitioner could not represent the monthly .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTK.M. Jaina Beevi and ors. Vs. M.K. Govindaswami
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Mar-04-1965
Reported in: AIR1967Mad369
..... would appear to have been negotiations between the second defendant and the respondent which eventually fructified into the suit agreement in view of it the respondent submitted to an eviction order ..... a result of negotiations between the second defendant and the respondent the suit agreement eventually fructified the agreement was between the respondent and the minor then 13 years of age represented .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSundaram Finance Ltd. Vs. State of Kerala and anr.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Nov-30-1965
Reported in: AIR1966SC1178; [1966]2SCR828; [1966]17STC489(SC)
..... the hire purchase agreements for the aforesaid reasons i hold that if the agreements had fructified into sales they were liable to sales tax the high court in my view gave ..... exercised sales took place in the goods which till then had been hired having thus fructified into sales the transactions were liable to sales tax 831 b 834 b m s .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial