Forked - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: forked Year: 2003 Page 1 of about 11,084 results (0.109 seconds)Laxman Singh @ Lachhuman Singh and ors. Vs. State of Bihar
Court: Patna
Decided on: Apr-08-2003
chandra mohan prasad j 1 the facts of both these appeals being common they have been heard together and are...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBasha Sahib Vs. Valikandapuram Village, Kasi Visvanathaswamy Koil, Rep ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-27-2003
Reported in: 2003(1)CTC19; (2003)1MLJ563
a k rajan j 1 second appeal is filed by the third defendant the respondents 1 and 2 herein and...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCentral Coalfields Limited Vs. State of Bihar and anr.
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Dec-08-2003
Reported in: 2004(1)BLJR368
order1 heard 2 this writ petition is filed by the central coalfields limited for quashing a communication annexure 1 issued...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTWestern Coalfields Ltd. Vs. State of Maharashtra and anr.
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Sep-16-2003
Reported in: 2004(2)ALLMR109; 2004(3)BomCR237; 2004(1)MhLj883
..... mounted self propelled excavator loader backhoe compactor roller dumper motor grader mobile crane dozer fork lift truck self loading concrete mixer or any other construction equipment vehicle or combination ..... mounted self propelled excavator loader backhoe compactor roller dumper motor grader mobile crane dozer fork lift truck designed for off highway operations and by way of explanation it is .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCit Vs. Popular Art Palace (P) Ltd.
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Jul-04-2003
Reported in: [2003]133TAXMAN658(Raj)
..... orders of this court passed in those cases the court has taken the view that fork lift is not a plant and machinery for the purpose of section 80 i 2 ..... agreement with the view taken by this court in the cases aforesaid 3 as the fork lift is not a plant and machinery under section 80 i 2 of the income .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTPramuk Traders and ors. Vs. Bharat Coking Coal Ltd. and ors.
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Nov-04-2003
Reported in: [2003(4)JCR659(Jhr)]
..... loading is not possible at pit head therefore shifting sizing either by manual or by fork lifting and storing in different loading points is undertaken either manually or by vehicles the .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTChemplast Sanmar Ltd. Vs. Cce
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu
Decided on: Jun-18-2003
Reported in: (2003)(111)LC500Tri(Chennai)
..... flanges hacksaw blades bolts and nuts chlorine cylinder valves paceman styles equipment for hcl absorption fork lifts and spares iron rods computer parts hydrogen gas cylinders light fittings oaskot and gaskol .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSagar Auto Works and ors. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Decided on: Oct-09-2003
Reported in: (2004)(163)ELT442Tri(Mum.)bai
..... hospitals equipment will include instruments apparatus and appliances and also specialised vehicles like dumper amp fork lift trucks ii a unfinished forms casting and forging of non interchangeable parts specified under .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTS. Muthuraman and ors. Vs. the Presiding Officer, Labour Court and the ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-04-2003
Reported in: (2003)IIILLJ52Mad
..... w p no 6335 96 1 the three out of five persons noted to come fork the night shift on today the other two persons came for the morning shift and .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTVirginia Vs. Black
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Apr-07-2003
..... who was in attendance the property was located on an open field just off brushy fork road state highway 690 in cana virginia when the sheriff of carroll county learned that .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial