Forked - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: forked Year: 2001 Page 1 of about 9,053 results (0.084 seconds)Sanjana Kumari and anr. Vs. the State of Bihar and ors.
Court: Patna
Decided on: Oct-03-2001
p k deb j 1 this writ petition has been filed for quashing the first information report of kotwali ps...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTC.C.E. Hyderabad Vs. M/S. Pitti Laminations Ltd.
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu
Decided on: Mar-21-2001
Reported in: (2001)(135)ELT1015Tri(Chennai)
..... sreekumrar submits that the department has not accepted the tribunal judgement and fork lift cannot be considered as capital goods as it does not ..... that the issue of grant of modvat credit in respect of fork lift used within the factory is covered by the judgements of ..... the tribunal noted above therefore so long as the item fork lift is used for shifting of materials from one place to .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSharpmax Engineers, Shri Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise,
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Decided on: Apr-27-2001
Reported in: (2001)(77)ECC102
..... falling under chapter 82 of the central excise tariff including spoons forks ladles skimmers cake servers fish knives butter knives and knives ..... the said classification list item no 1 was specified as spoons forks etc and classification thereof was claimed as under chapter sub ..... under which the goods fall chapter head sub head spoons forks ladles tableware 82 82 15 8215 00kitchen knives and please .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCommissioner of Central Excise Vs. Orissa Synthetics Ltd.
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Calcutta
Decided on: Aug-24-2001
..... of the revenue is as regards the admissibility of modvat credit on fork lift truck and cutter box attachment it is seen that cutter box ..... attachment is a part of fork lift truck 2 after hearing both sides i find that the issue ..... 100 elt 319 tribunal it has been observed that the parts of fork lift truck are liable for modvat credit under rule 57q of central .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCc and Ce, Bbsr-i Vs. M/S. Mangalam Timber Products
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Calcutta
Decided on: May-30-2001
..... in the present appeal is as regards the availability of modvat credit in respect of fork lift truck under the provision of rule 57q the commissioner appeals after following the tribunal ..... s various orders has held that fork lift truck is an admissible item for the purposes of modvat credit the revenue in .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTFinolex Cables Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise,
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Decided on: Aug-31-2001
1 the issue involved in this appeal is the admissibility of modvat credit on 1 fork lift truck and 2 hydrolic mobile crane as capital goods in terms of rule 57q ..... a number of cases the tribunal had occasion to examine the admissibility of such goods fork lift trucks and cranes were held as admissible under rule 57q of cer 1944 in .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTThe Commissioner of Central Vs. Bpl Engineering Ltd.
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT
Decided on: Nov-28-2001
..... goods at various stages and not for producing or processing of any goods iii diesel fork lift truck is used for handling raw materials and not for production or processing of ..... decided the issued of modvat credit in respect of testing measuring instruments equipments and diesel fork lift truck used handling raw materials however there are conflicting judgements on air conditioners and .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMahindra and Mahindra Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise and
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Decided on: May-04-2001
..... this contention which contention has to be accepted material handling equipment such as overhead crane fork lift and pedestal stacker would thus have be considered to be capital goods these are ..... decision of the larger bench 5 the appeal is allowed with regard to eot cranes fork lift and pedestal stacker consequential relief
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMini Taxi Owners' and Drivers' Association and Ors. Vs. State of A.P., ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Feb-14-2001
Reported in: 2001(2)ALT340
..... permits and section 71 deals with the procedure of regional transport authority in considering application fork stage carriage permit section 72 hereof deals with grant of stage carriage permits while section ..... the holder of the goods carriage permit fails without reasonable cause to use the vehicle fork the purpose for which the permit was granted or if the holder of the permit .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTKabushiki Kaisha Toshiba Vs. Tosiba Appliances Company
Court: Trademark
Decided on: Sep-24-2001
Reported in: (2002)(24)PTC654Reg
..... utensils were the different goods than that of the defendants goods namely spoons knifes and forks 38 this decision has no bearing in the facts and circumstances of the case in .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial