Foregoers - Year 2016 - Judgments

Nov 11 2016 (SC)

Jindal Stainless Ltd. and Anr. Vs. State of Haryana and Ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Nov-11-2016

..... and commerce article 306 before its deletion provided as follows 306 notwithstanding anything in the foregoing provisions of this part or in any other provisions of this constitution any state ..... their sovereignty and is also against the federal structure of the constitution we in the foregoing paragraphs have elaborately considered the nature of federal structure of the constitution of india which .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 13 2016 (HC)

Ashok Kumar Aggarwal Vs. CBI and Others

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Jan-13-2016

..... xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx 26 from the foregoing it is clear that had the cbi included the vital and ..... opportunity to the parties to the action 28 in view of the foregoing the issues that require adjudication and determination in the writ petition ..... provisions of section 19 1 poca 73 therefore in view of the foregoing discussion issue no ii raised in writ petition criminal no 1401 .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Oct 04 2016 (HC)

M/s. Ghodawat Energy Pvt. Ltd. Vs. The State of Maharashtra, Through t ...

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Oct-04-2016

..... he has also taken us extensively through the provisions of the enactments referred in the foregoing paragraphs the constitution and the objects and reasons of the taxation laws amendment bill 2007 ..... none of the constitutional provisions pressed into service by mr sridharan and reproduced in the foregoing paragraphs indicate that the legislative power of the state is in anyway curbed or curtailed .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 22 2016 (HC)

Adi Dara Patel and Others Vs. S. R. Jondhale and Others

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Apr-22-2016

..... non obstante clause namely notwithstanding anything contained in any of the foregoing provisions of this chapter namely chapter iii the clause a ..... has to be exercised notwithstanding anything contained in any of the foregoing provisions of this chapter namely chapter iii then even section ..... for the state 187 we have already held in the foregoing paragraphs that petitioner nos 1 and 2 have no right .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Oct 06 2016 (HC)

Ms Shah Brothers Through One of Its Partner Sri Raj Kumar Shah Vs. The ...

Court: Jharkhand

Decided on: Oct-06-2016

..... the respondent state has reiterated the opening statement and submissions as noticed in the foregoing paragraphs it is submitted that the assertion made in the counter affidavit and the ..... statutory remedy of revision before the central government mining tribunal the discussions in the foregoing paragraphs however unmistakably show that the instant matters raised legal issues of substantial importance .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Oct 06 2016 (HC)

Anil Khirwal Vs. The Union of India Through the Ministry of Mines and ...

Court: Jharkhand

Decided on: Oct-06-2016

..... the respondent state has reiterated the opening statement and submissions as noticed in the foregoing paragraphs it is submitted that the assertion made in the counter affidavit and the ..... statutory remedy of revision before the central government mining tribunal the discussions in the foregoing paragraphs however unmistakably show that the instant matters raised legal issues of substantial importance .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Oct 06 2016 (HC)

Padam Kumar Jain Vs. The Union of India Through the Ministry of Mines ...

Court: Jharkhand

Decided on: Oct-06-2016

..... the respondent state has reiterated the opening statement and submissions as noticed in the foregoing paragraphs it is submitted that the assertion made in the counter affidavit and the ..... statutory remedy of revision before the central government mining tribunal the discussions in the foregoing paragraphs however unmistakably show that the instant matters raised legal issues of substantial importance .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 28 2016 (SC)

State of H.P and Ors Vs. Rajesh Chander Sood Etc Etc

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Sep-28-2016

..... to their disadvantage it was averred that the employees did not forego any pre existing better or higher benefit while exercising their ..... so in the present controversy by having expressly chosen to forego his rights under the employees provident funds scheme 1995 52 ..... out that all that the respondent employees had gained by foregoing the employer s contribution and the accrued interest thereon has .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 05 2016 (SC)

Surinderjit Singh Mand and Anr. Vs. State of Punjab and Anr.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Jul-05-2016

..... of their official duties 16 in order to support the submissions recorded in the foregoing paragraphs learned counsel for the respondents placed reliance on p p unnikrishnan vs puttiyottil ..... section 197 can have no bearing 19 in continuation of the submissions noticed in the foregoing paragraphs it was asserted by learned counsel representing the respondents that the prosecution contemplated .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 19 2016 (SC)

Messer Holdings Ltd. Vs. Shyam Madanmohan Ruia and Ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Apr-19-2016

..... connection therewith and shall refrain from doing anything inconsistent with the foregoing or the rights reverted assigned transferred as above on and ..... mgg 11 a the parties confirm and acknowledge that as the foregoing 45 001 shares of bocl have not been registered in ..... of the ruias similarly the parties confirm and acknowledge that the foregoing 30 000 shares of bocl have also not been registered .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Foregoers - Judgment Search Results