Skip to content

Did you mean: foreigners?


Foregoers - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: foregoers Year: 2002 Page 1 of about 1,315 results (0.016 seconds)
Feb 06 2002 (HC)

Sarabhai Chemicals (P) Ltd. Vs. Cit

Court: Gujarat

Decided on: Feb-06-2002

Reported in: (2002)173CTR(Guj)193

..... company and transferring its shares to that subsidiary company and thus foregoing part of its own profits and at the same time enabling ..... assessee was a sole shareholder of the transferee elscope and by foregoing interest of rs 1 20 crores for two years without any ..... the total income in the quantum proceedings 20 7 for the foregoing reasons we are of the opinion that there was no justification .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 30 2002 (HC)

Kuruva Venkatanna Vs. E. Lakshman Goud and anr.

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Decided on: Jul-30-2002

Reported in: 2004ACJ1032; 2002(6)ALT478

..... validity and legality of the said award and the decree and the foregoing adjudication r 1 and r 2 did not file any independent cmas ..... 2 inter alia urging that the impugned award and the decree and the foregoing adjudication exonerating r 2 from its liability to pay any part of ..... entitled to the sum total of the monies arrived at in the foregoing paras which comes to rs 1 19 500 however maximum o p .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 19 2002 (HC)

Aptech Ltd. and ors. Vs. State of Gujarat and anr.

Court: Gujarat

Decided on: Jul-19-2002

Reported in: (2003)1GLR56

..... the petitioners while referring to the pleadings which are exhaustively narrated by this court in foregoing paragraphs contended that there is no prima fade case against the petitioners for commission of ..... and hence the petition deservers to be rejected at the admission stage 32 for the foregoing reasons the petition fails and accordingly it is rejected at the threshold notice is discharged .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Feb 22 2002 (TRI)

Sumerpur Truck Operators Union Vs. Income-tax Officer

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Jodhpur

Decided on: Feb-22-2002

Reported in: (2004)89ITD89(Jodh.)

..... the same as legal and valid 2 that without prejudice to the foregoing ground of appeal in the facts and in the circumstances of the ..... i t act 1961 4 that without prejudice to all the three foregoing grounds of appeal and in the alternative the ld cit a has ..... cit a 34 gr no 4 is regarding without prejudice to all foregoing grounds of appeal and in the alternative the appellant agitated on the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 05 2002 (HC)

Babulal @ Damodhar S/O Hiralal Gujarathi and ors. Vs. Kisan S/O Shripa ...

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Apr-05-2002

Reported in: 2004(1)MhLj734

..... save as otherwise provided in sub section 2 nothing in the foregoing provisions of this act shall apply a to lands belonging to ..... act because the imperative words of section 88 nothing in the foregoing provisions of the act shall apply to the area reserved for ..... non agricultural or industrial development the foregoing provisions are sections 1 to 87 a and therefore the moment .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 15 2002 (HC)

Mohd. QutubuddIn Vs. Aziz Khan and anr.

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Decided on: Mar-15-2002

Reported in: 2002AIHC4073

..... property was recognised by a competentcourt in the light of the foregoing discussion we areof the view that the judgments in s a ..... section 47 of thetenancy act 103 in the light of the foregoing discussion we holdthat the sale in favour of muneera sultana the ..... the said reason we allowed the amendment application 122 for the foregoing discussion we allow theapplication filed under order vi rule 17 of .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 10 2002 (SC)

Indian National Congress (i) Vs. Institute of Social Welfare and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: May-10-2002

Reported in: AIR2002SC2158; JT2002(Suppl1)SC398; 2002(2)KLT548(SC); (2002)3MLJ164(SC); 2002(4)SCALE627; (2002)5SCC685; [2002]3SCR1040

..... v kusaldas advani supra has been dealt with by us in the foregoing paragraph and is of no help to the case of the ..... order we have already examined this aspect of the matter in the foregoing paragraph and held that the functions exercisable by the commission under section ..... k mendiratta 42 to sum up what we have held in the foregoing paragraph are as under 1 that there being no express provision .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 31 2002 (HC)

Rajesh Mahajan and ors. Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Jul-31-2002

Reported in: (2004)186CTR(P& H)428; [2002]257ITR577(P& H)

..... of wards nos 1 and 4 from the facts depicted in the foregoing paragraph it is apparent that petitioners nos 1 to 4 are ..... any financial nexus between the two in the background of the foregoing discussion in my view the mere fact that petitioner no 1 ..... other facts relevant to the impugned order have been noticed in the foregoing paragraphs while dealing with the validity nexus of the reasons recorded .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 23 2002 (HC)

Kalipatnapu Atchutamma Vs. Kommana Sambamurthy (Died) Per Lrs. and ors ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Decided on: Dec-23-2002

Reported in: 2003(2)ALD805; 2003(3)ALT82

..... the procedure prescribed by sub section 2 of the last foregoing section 22 it is too premature for the defendant to ..... madan mohan ghosh air1997sc471 reiterated the five essential requisites for the foregoing reasons the contention of the learned counsel merits no consideration ..... other joint family members or co owners 25 for the foregoing reasons the case of the second defendant cannot be accepted .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 18 2002 (HC)

Dhariwal Industries Ltd. and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Sep-18-2002

Reported in: 2003(2)BomCR698

..... 1 a in particular and without prejudice to the generality of the foregoing power such rules may provide for all or any of the ..... 23 2 in particular and without prejudice to the generality of the foregoing power such rules may a define the powers and duties of ..... public health such prohibition cannot be faulted 53 in view of the foregoing discussion we summarise our conclusions thus i section 7 iv of the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.

Sign-up to get more results

Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.

Start Free Trial

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //