Foreclose - Judgment Search Results

Regina Vs. J (Appellant) (on Appeal from the Court of Appeal (Criminal ...

Court: House of Lords

lord bingham of cornhill my lords 1 the point of law of general public importance certified by the court of...

Praveen Kumar Agrawal Vs. Union of India (Uoi) Through the Secretary, ...

Court: Jharkhand

Reported in: [2004(4)JCR354(Jhr)]

p k balasubramanyan c j 1 the writ petitioner claims to be a social worker working for the benefit of...

Till Vs. Scs Credit Corp.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... cram down interest rates at the level the creditor could have obtained if it had foreclosed on the loan sold the collateral and reinvested the proceeds in loans of equivalent duration ..... prebankruptcy dealings with the debtor or the alternative loans it could make if permitted to foreclose footnote 15 rather the court should aim to treat similarly situated creditors similarly footnote 16 .....

Vieth Vs. Jubelirer

Court: US Supreme Court

..... and while understanding that great caution is necessary when approaching this subject i would not foreclose all possibility of judicial relief if some limited and precise rationale were found to correct ..... to challenge the constitutionality of district 6 2 that her district specific claim is not foreclosed by the bandemer plurality s rejection of a statewide claim of political gerrymandering and 3 .....

Kp Permanent Make-up, Inc. Vs. Lasting Impression I, Inc.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... 3d 243 256 ca6 2003 a finding of a likelihood of confusion forecloses a fair use defense and zatarains inc v oak grove smokehouse ..... an affirmative defense but under lasting s theory the defense would be foreclosed in such a case i t defies logic to argue that ..... fair use can occur along with some degree of confusion does not foreclose the relevance of the extent of any likely consumer confusion in .....

United States Vs. Patane

Court: US Supreme Court

..... oregon v elstad 470 u s 298 and michigan v tucker 417 u s 433 foreclosed application of the fruit of the poisonous tree doctrine of wong sun v united states ..... the government s argument that this court s decisions in elstad supra and tucker supra foreclosed application of the fruit of the poisonous tree doctrine of wong sun v united states .....

Shiv NaraIn Singh (D.) Through L.Rs. Vs. Board of Revenue and ors.

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: AIR2005All45; 2004(4)AWC3050

..... court rightly observed that a court knows that refusal to condone delay would result in foreclosing a suitor from putting forth his cause and the words sufficient cause under section 5 ..... for the petitioner in case door of justice is shut against him and it would foreclose all options for him to put forth his cause 8 in yet another case namely .....

Kowalski Vs. Tesmer

Court: US Supreme Court

..... collateral review exist beyond that the attorneys hypothesis that without counsel such avenues are effectively foreclosed was disproved in the michigan courts and this court where pro se indigents have pursued ..... 28 u s c 2254 the attorneys argue that without counsel these avenues are effectively foreclosed to indigents they claim that unsophisticated pro se criminal defendants could not satisfy the .....

Fellers Vs. United States

Court: US Supreme Court

..... his home held the eighth circuit erred in holding that the absence of an interrogation foreclosed petitioner s claim that his jailhouse statements should have been suppressed as fruits of the ..... not implicated the court of appeals erred in holding that the absence of an interrogation foreclosed petitioner s claim that the jailhouse statements should have been suppressed as fruits of the .....

Van Oord Acz India Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Guajrat Adani Port Pvt. Ltd.

Court: Gujarat

Reported in: AIR2005Guj284; 2005(2)ARBLR58(Gujarat); (2005)1GLR446

..... third arbitrator under section 11 of the said act 1996 is not to conclude or foreclose any of the contentions of either party to an agreement including i qualifications of the ..... the arbitrator can be raised before the arbitrators the court ought not to conclude or foreclose the aforesaid arguments of the parties thus even if the arbitrator is appointed under section .....