Foreclose - Judgment Search Results

Venkatakrishna Rice Company Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax

Court: Chennai

Reported in: [1987]163ITR129(Mad)

balasubrahmanyan j 1 the question referred to us by the income tax appellate tribunal in this reference reads as follows...

Middlesex County Sewerage Auth. Vs. Sea Clammers

Court: US Supreme Court

..... that the existence of these express remedies demonstrates not only that congress intended to foreclose implied private actions but also that it intended to supplant any remedy that otherwise ..... this burden by identifying express statutory language or legislative history revealing congress intent to foreclose the 1983 remedy or by establishing that congress intended that the remedies provided in .....

Metromedia, Inc. Vs. City of San Diego

Court: US Supreme Court

..... in controlling the noncommunicative aspects of billboards but the first and fourteenth amendments foreclose similar interests in controlling the communicative aspects of billboards because regulation of the ..... of the medium kovacs v cooper supra but the first and fourteenth amendments foreclose a similar interest in controlling the communicative aspects because regulation of the noncommunicative .....

Fec Vs. Democratic Senatorial Campaign Comm.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... the act and its legislative history 441a d 3 does not foreclose the use of agency agreements the commission thus acted within the ..... not one of the authorized spenders under 441a d 3 would foreclose all agency agreements regardless of the identity of the agent and ..... more that the statute does not expressly or by necessary implication foreclose the agency agreements at issue in this case but neither does .....

City of Milwaukee Vs. Illinois

Court: US Supreme Court

..... have had the effect under epa regulations requiring exhaustive planning and examination of alternatives of foreclosing recourse to funds congress intended to be available footnote 16 in light of this ..... not be taken as presumptive evidence let alone conclusive proof that congress meant to foreclose preexisting approaches to controlling interstate water pollution footnote 2 7 where the possible page .....

United Air Lines, Inc. Vs. Division of Industrial Safety of

Court: US Supreme Court

..... facilities and therefore under the supremacy clause state regulation was foreclosed no part of this claim was grounded in state law ..... 1337 federal jurisdiction of course could not have existed if foreclosed by the fact that the federal claim could be and ..... a pending or threatened state action based on state law is foreclosed on jurisdictional grounds from seeking a federal declaratory judgment or .....

Diamond Vs. Diehr

Court: US Supreme Court

..... the use of that equation rather they seek only to foreclose from others the use of that equation in conjunction with ..... the fact that a process may be performed mentally should not foreclose patentability if the claims reveal that the process also may ..... that year the court rejected two longstanding doctrines that would have foreclosed patentability for most computer programs under 101 footnote 2 47 .....

Complete Auto Transit, Inc. Vs. Reis

Court: US Supreme Court

..... strike id at 4839 4841 footnote 15 the senate passed this version of the bill foreclosing individual damages liability in both 301 and 303 lawsuits at conference the conference committee squarely ..... remedy for wildcat strikes the court today holds properly i think that congress intended to foreclose a damages remedy against individual wildcat strikers the court states however that page 451 u .....

ScIndia Steam Nav. Co., Ltd. Vs. Santos

Court: US Supreme Court

..... this conclusion is consistent with congress intent under the 1972 amendments of the act to foreclose the shipowner s previous faultless liability based on a theory of unseaworthiness or nondelegable ..... no duty to inform himself this conclusion is plainly consistent with the congressional intent to foreclose the faultless liability of the shipowner based on a theory of unseaworthiness or nondelegable .....

Maryland Vs. Louisiana

Court: US Supreme Court

..... made by the owner in preparation of marketing the natural gas and forecloses the owner from seeking reimbursement for payment of the tax from ..... to louisiana for payment of the taxes they of course are foreclosed from suing for a refund in louisiana s courts in such ..... u s 750 of natural gas owners of natural gas are foreclosed by the operation of 1303c from entering into valid contracts requiring .....