Forcing - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: forcing Year: 1992 Page 1 of about 302 results (0.023 seconds)Mir Naimathulla Vs. the Director General, Railway Protection Force and ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-09-1992
Reported in: 1992(2)ALT44
..... from the date his juniors were promoted i e with effect from force order 148 84 dated 19 10 1984 with all consequential benefits ..... instruction no 4 to the annual confidential reports of the railway protection force that instruction reads as follows if the officer has served under ..... sub inspector from the date his juniors are promoted as per the force order 148 84 dated 19 10 1984 he will be entitled .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTState by the Sub-inspector of Railway Protection Force Vs. Radhakrishn ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-30-1992
Reported in: 1993CriLJ1457
..... confessional statements to p w 1 to a personnel belonging to railway protection force after completion of the investigation a complaint had been filed which was taken ..... accused no doubt true it is that the personnel belonging to railway protection force in the eye of law is not to be construed as a ..... 1 the sub inspector of police railway protection force katpadi registered a case in crime no 17 80 for .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTThe Central Reserve Police Force and anr. Vs. Minati Dhal and Basudev ...
Court: Orissa
Decided on: Feb-10-1992
Reported in: II(1993)ACC137; 1993ACJ760; 73(1992)CLT550; 1992(I)OLR470
s c mohapatra j 1 these two appeals are by the owner of the vehicle under section 110 d of...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTPlanned Parenthood of Southeastern PA. Vs. Casey
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jun-29-1992
..... at 712 for example petitioners argue many notified husbands will prevent abortions through physical force psychological coercion and other types of threats but pennsylvania has incorporated exceptions in ..... challenge the requirement that facilities provide this information they contend however that the forced public disclosure of the information given by facilities receiving public funds serves no .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTindra Sawhney Etc. Etc Vs. Union of India and Others, Etc. Etc.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Nov-16-1992
Reported in: AIR1993SC477; [1992]Supp2SCR454; 1992DGLS(soft)768:1992Supp(3)SCC217
..... discrimination rooted in religious or caste prejudices and the like or to economic exploitation forced labour social isolation or other victimisation may find themselves sinking deeply into inescapable and ..... affirmative action promotes maximum well being for the society as a whole and strengthens forces of national integration and general economic prosperity any benign affirmative action with a view .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMangal Singh Bhatti Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Sep-02-1992
Reported in: 1993CriLJ3070
..... such person cannot be procured except through military naval or air force authorities the magistrate may by a written notice require the ..... under rule 3 a by the aforesaid military naval or air force authorities and where the concerned officer or authority subsequently gives ..... abovesaid superior position of the said military naval or air force authorities it is provided in rule 8 that the magistrate .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSamir Bhattacharya and ors. Vs. the State of West Bengal and ors.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Apr-20-1992
Reported in: (1992)2CALLT333(HC)
..... should say what here one bupendra chandra chaturbedi additional deputy inspector general border security force headquarters south bengal frontier has affirmed the affidavit stating that the home guards have ..... appearing for the union of india and the inspector general of police border security force in words categorically that apart from reimbursing the expenditure incurred by the state government .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTThe Govt. of Karnataka and Another Vs. Paramanna and Others
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jan-29-1992
Reported in: AIR1992Kant237; ILR1992KAR739
..... pending on the date of karnataka act 13 89 came into force therefore the question that arises for consideration is as to whether ..... instituted before the date the karnataka act 13 89 came into force has been taken away by necessary intendment 12 any other interpretation ..... serious anomaly inasmuch as the appeals preferred prior to coming into force of karnataka act 13 of 89 from the decrees and orders .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSk. Abubakkar Vs. Mst. Ohidunnessa Bibi
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Apr-29-1992
Reported in: 1992CriLJ2826
..... notwithstanding anything contained in any other law for the time being in force a divorced woman shall be entitled to reasonable and fair provision ..... would cover only the cases filed after the new act came into force and those cases under sections 125 and 127 which were pending ..... anything contained in any other law for the time being in force a divorced woman shall be entitled to a a reasonable and .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTUnion of India (Uoi) Through Ministry of Home Affairs and ors. Vs. Ex- ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Nov-17-1992
Reported in: (1993)103PLR356
..... singh respondent herein was a constable in the border security force he was posted at jalandhar cantonment in april 1981 a ..... consequently charged under sections 40 and 46 of the border security force act 1968 hereinafter referred to as the act during trial ..... levelled against him and consequently he was convicted by the security force court and sentenced to six months rigorous imprisonment he was .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial