Forcing - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: forcing Year: 1952 Page 1 of about 933 results (0.075 seconds)Madsen Vs. Kinsella
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Apr-28-1952
..... no 1 12 fed reg 6997 3 september 19 1945 commanding general united states forces european theater proclaimed article ii except as heretofore abrogated suspended or modified by military ..... in the following fields are specifically reserved e protection prestige and security of allied forces dependents employees and representatives their immunities and satisfaction of occupation costs and their other .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTT.S.R. Sarma Vs. Nagendra Bala Debi
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Sep-10-1952
Reported in: AIR1952Cal879,57CWN1
..... out of suits instituted before the date when the amendment came into force and could not affect the right of appeal as of right ..... suggest that the section is not intended to apply of its own force to pending suits for ejectment against tenants in my opinion since the ..... the act would have applied to these suits and applied with full force section 14 of the act which provides for relief would have been .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTYoungstown Sheet and Tube Co. Vs. Sawyer
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jun-02-1952
..... navy emphasis supplied this certainly lays upon congress primary responsibility for supplying the armed forces congress alone controls the raising of revenues and their appropriation and may determine ..... private enterprise collectively bargaining with free labor for support and maintenance of our armed forces can the executive because of lawful disagreements incidental to that process seize the .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTGadadhar Saharia Vs. Ambika Kumar
Court: Guwahati
Decided on: May-14-1952
..... statement the dispossession could not be said to have been caused by resort to force or show of force or criminal intimidation this occurred when criminal trespass was committed on the previous ..... is no doubt therefore that he has dispossessed the complainant and also by show of force interference in revision would not be desirable in these circumstances every technical error of law .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTDowager Rani Lalitha Kumari Devi and ors. Vs. the Raja of Vizianagaram ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-25-1952
Reported in: AIR1954Mad19
..... included in the schedule which had before the coming into force of the act been permanently transferred from the registered proprietor ..... place after the madras impartible estates act had come into force but as indicated by the observations quoted above section 7 ..... in the said schedule which have before the coming into force of this act been permanently transferred from the registered proprietors .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTUnited Commercial Press Ltd. Vs. SatyanaraIn Chamaria
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Jan-09-1952
Reported in: AIR1953Cal136,56CWN346
..... premises rent control temporary provisions amendment act 1950 which came into force on november 30 1950 by this amending statute the term tenant ..... act would have applied to these suits and applied with full force section 14 of the act which provides for relief would ..... terms only applies to suits brought after the act came into force and therefore the section cannot be applied strictly and literally to .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTEdward Ezra and ors. Vs. the State
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Apr-29-1952
Reported in: AIR1953Cal263,56CWN875
..... the sense of repealed the article covers all laws in force immediately before the commencement of the constitution which obviously ..... constitution as already explained consequently on the constitution coming into force the ordinance ceased to be valid and since there was ..... 14 the proceedings held after the constitution had come into force involved no inequality of treatment after the commencement of the .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTKawakita Vs. United States
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jun-02-1952
..... for japan and brutally abused american prisoners of war who were forced to work there after japan s surrender he registered as an ..... playing the role of the traitor may defend by showing that force or coercion compelled such conduct the jury rejected that version of ..... for making articles of clothing out of blankets struck them and forced them to strike each other petitioner hit prisoners who he thought .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTAdler Vs. Board of Educ. of City of New York
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Mar-03-1952
..... of their advocacy of the overthrow of the government by force or violence or secondly by unexplained membership in an ..... organization that teaches and advocates the overthrow of government by force or violence we find no constitutional infirmity in 12 a ..... educational system anyone who advocates the overthrow of government by force violence or any unlawful means or publishes material advocating such .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCarlson Vs. Landon
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Mar-10-1952
..... are deportable like anarchists because of congress understanding of their attitude toward the use of force and violence in such a constitutional democracy as ours to accomplish their political aims evidence ..... extension of the proscription of residence to aliens believing in the overthrow of government by force or violence has been progressive as can be readily observed by following the successive .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial