Footed - Judgment Search Results

Rajpath Foot Path Byabasai Sangha Vs. State of Orissa and Three ors.

Court: Orissa

Reported in: 2005(I)OLR21

order1 heard mr a dash learned counsel for the petitioner mr d mohapatra learned counsel for the b d a...

Mohammed Zahir Vs. Food Inspector, Food Cell and anr.

Court: Orissa

Reported in: 2004(I)OLR659

l mohapatra j 1 this revision is directed against the order dated 29 1 2003 passed by the learned chief...

Rama Balawant Hegde Vs. the Food Inspector

Court: Karnataka

Reported in: 2004CriLJ3605; ILR2004KAR3106; 2004(5)KarLJ138

orderk ramanna j 1 all these three revision petitions are filed by the respective revision petitioners accused against the judgment...

Ramdas Jaiswal Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh

Court: Madhya Pradesh

Reported in: 2004(3)MPHT303

ordera k shrivastava j 1 the applicant has been convicted under section 7 16 of prevention of food adulteration act...

H.V. Krishna Rao Vs. the Assistant Commissioner and Land Acquisition O ...

Court: Karnataka

Reported in: 2004(7)KarLJ89

..... in fixing the market value at the rate of rs 6 per sq foot has completely eschewed relevant factors and evidence on record sri h n ..... accordingly fixed the market value at the rate of 50 paise per sq foot for all sites therefore it should not lie in the mouth of the ..... 181 of the appellant at the rate of rs 13 20 per sq foot the impugned award shall stand modified accordingly we also declare that the .....

L. Royal Reddy and ors. Vs. Government of Andhra Pradesh and ors.

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: AIR2004AP347; 2004(2)ALD225; 2004(2)ALT210

..... to in notification under section 3 tax is levied on that footing and an entry is also made in the certificate of registration ..... registered as a contract carriage and the tax is paid on that footing for violation of any conditions of a contract carriage permit action ..... class referred to in that notification tax is levied on that footing and an entry is also made in the certificate of registration .....

Fouress Engineering (India) (P) Ltd., by Its Manager Vs. V. Krishnan

Court: Chennai

Reported in: 2004(4)CTC362; (2004)3MLJ107

..... false ceiling portion the cost can be calculated at rs 20 per square foot as found by the learned rent controller and the learned rent control appellate ..... the cost of site would be about rs 1 617 90 per square foot in the year 1993 94 accordingly p w 2 the junior assistant ..... site of the petition premises will be rs 1 617 90 per square foot from april 1993 to 31 3 1994 the value being the guideline .....

Waters and Others (Appellants) Vs. Welsh Development Agency (Responden ...

Court: House of Lords

..... designated for residential use had to be valued on the footing that it had planning permission for residential development see section ..... that authorises compulsory acquisition and it does so on the footing that compensation in accordance with the prescribed statutory regime will ..... to address the arguments advanced on the appeal on the footing that the principle embodied in the pointe gourde line of .....

Maruti Udyog Ltd. Vs. Dy. Cit

Court: Delhi

Reported in: [2005]92ITD120(Delhi)

..... exports made by assessed the cit a has proceeded on the footing that such income accrued to assessed automatically the moment exports were ..... in the year under consideration the cit a proceeded on the footing that duty draw back accrued to the assessed the moment ..... the assessing officer and sustained by the cit a on the footing that expenditure in respect of litigation in the criminal proceedings is .....

Maruti Udyog Ltd. Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi

Reported in: (2005)92ITD119(Delhi)

..... exports made by assessee the cit a has proceeded on the footing that such income accrued to assessee automatically the moment exports were ..... in the year under consideration the git a proceeded on the footing that duty drawback accrued to the assessee the moment exports were ..... relevant material on record the cit a had proceeded on the footing that goods being in transit the said amount did not constitute .....