Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: food corporations act 1964 section 18 capital of state food corporation Page 11 of about 8,032 results (0.519 seconds)

Mar 14 2007 (HC)

Srinidhi Anantharaman, Managing Director, Geo Desic Techniques Pvt. Lt ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : [2007(115)FLR711]; ILR2007KAR3055; 2007(5)KarLJ446

..... the unit trust of india established under section 3 of the unit trust of india act, 1963 (52 of 1963), or the food corporation of india established under section 3, or a board of management established for two or ore contiguous stales wider section 16 of the food corporation act, 1964 (37 of 1964), or the airports authority of india constituted under sections of the airports authority of ..... india act, 1994 (55 of 1994), or a regional rural bank established under section 3 of the regional rural banks act, 1976 (21 of 1976), or the export credit and guarantee .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 31 2006 (HC)

Food Corporation of India and anr. Vs. Clearing and Forwarding Unprote ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2006(5)BomCR717; (2006)IIILLJ463Bom; 2006(4)MhLj407

..... of the food corporation act, 1964. petitioner no. 2 is an ex-senior regional manager of petitioner no. 1. respondent no. 1 is a statutory board established under the provisions of the maharashtra mathadi, hamal and other manual workers (regulation of employment and welfare) act, 1969 (hereinafter referred to as the 'mathadi act'). respondent no ..... between the petitioners and respondent no. 1 since january 1997, respondent no. 1 has brought to the attention of the petitioners, that the mathadi act and the scheme framed thereunder are applicable to the establishment of the petitioners. the petitioners were, therefore, directed to get registered or face penal consequences ..... under section 258 of the civil procedure code to terminate the proceedings and discharge the petitioners. the ground taken was, that the applicability of the mathadi act has not yet been decided by the appropriate government and further they were merely consignees and not principal employer and, therefore, no prosecution can .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 14 1980 (HC)

Maharashtra State Electricity Board Vs. M.C. Chitale and Others

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : [1980(41)FLR199]; (1981)ILLJ462Bom

..... and natural gas commission act, 1959. it is clear that neither there is any provision for ..... . there are many statutory corporations which do provide for share capital and enjoin upon the government to subscribe to the same. few such enactments are : the warehousing corporation act, 1962, the agricultural refinance corporation act, 1963, the industrial development bank of india act, 1964, the unit trust of india act, 1944, the food corporation act 1964, the bank of india act, 1955, the life insurance corporation act, 1946, the deposit insurance corporation act, 1961, and the oil .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 01 1993 (HC)

The Karnataka Contract Labour and Transport Co-op. Society Ltd. and Ot ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : AIR1994Kant147; ILR1993KAR3417; 1993(4)KarLJ472

..... common respondent-1 in all these proceedings.3. it is a statutory corporation having been constituted by the central government under s. 3 of the food corporation of india act, 1964. its main object is of implementing food policy and for taking-up state trading in food stuffs on an appropriate scale and to build up buffer stocks gradually etc ..... . as it is a statutory corporation, it is a 'state' within the meaning of art. ..... be prescribed and/or demanded for inspection to the officers of the regional provident fund commissioner and to the senior regional manager, food corporation of india or an officer authorised by him or acting on his behalf.38. at page-12 is found a provision regarding payment of wages to workers and other provisions in .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 30 1996 (HC)

Zonal Manager, Food Corpn. of India and ors. Vs. D. Venkata Rao and or ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 1997(1)ALT594; (1998)IIILLJ783AP

..... the contract labour. similar was the view taken by the punjab and haryana high court in gian singh v. food corporation of india, punjab region (supra). while explaining sections 2(e), 2(g), 7and 12 of act, 1971, 1970(sic. 1970), the punjab and haryana high court held that where the principal employer was registered as ..... these writ appeals is, whether the writ petitioners who are the respondents herein were the workmen of the food corporation of india and entitled to seek regularisation of their services even though they were the members of the food corporation of india, modern rice mill muta workers labour contract co-operative society, sattenapalli, guntur district, who ..... '.4. the facts not in dispute are that the corporation is an instrumentality of the state under article 12 of the constitution of india and that the 5th respondent co-operative society is a society registered under the provisions of the a.p. cooperative societies act, 1964, and the workmen were the members of the said .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 25 1964 (HC)

Municipal Corporation, Delhi Vs. Jai Dayal Jawanda Mal

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : 1964CriLJ723

..... was a likelihood of the sample having been changed by the food inspector because both the sample and the seal were with him.7. the court, also referred to a decision of a learned single judge of this court in r. c. shaida v. municipal corporation of delhi, 1964-66 pun lr 537, in which the result of analysis of ..... by us.mohanlal chhaganlal v. vipanchandra, : air1962guj44 is of no greater assistance to the respondent. apart from the question of constitutionality of section 13(5) of the act, which does not concern us the only other point on which that court expressed its opinion is that finality or conclusiveness is attributed to the factual data in respect of ..... is erroneous. the order of acquittal is therefore, clearly unsustainable.the question which now arises is that to what sentence is to be imposed. the offences under the food adulteration act are, in my opinion, serious because they have a far reaching effect on the health of the nation but at the same time, the offence in the instant .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 03 1972 (HC)

Municipal Corporation of Delhi Vs. Kishan Lal

Court : Delhi

Reported in : ILR1972Delhi296

..... is about the sentence. we have no doubt that in view of the provisions of section 7 read with section 16 of the prevention of food adulteration act, the municipal corporation was fully justified in asking for enhancement of the sentence and the only porper sentence that could be awarded to the respondent was six months' rigorous ..... were admittedly present on the occasion. there was thus a violation of the mandatory provision of section 10(7) of the prevention of food adulteration act. (9) on behalf of the municipal corporation of delhi, its learned counsel submitted that an independent person had been associated but unfortunately he was not traceable when the time for ..... the special leave petition. relying upon a decision of the supreme court in kaushalya rani v. gopal singh : [1964]4scr982 shri d. r. sethi appearing for the respondent submitted that section 5 of the limitation act does not apply to an application for special leave under section 417(3) of the code of criminal procedure. (5 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 02 1976 (HC)

Hanmant Kallappa Bhandare Vs. the Food Inspector, Poona Municipal Corp ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : (1977)79BOMLR181; 1977MhLJ1

..... and after obtaining the requisite sanction, the petitioner came to be prosecuted before the judicial magistrate, first class, poona municipal corporation, poona, for the offence under section 16(1)(a)(i) of the prevention of food adulteration act, 1954, who found him guilty and sentenced him to suffer rigorous imprisonment for six months with a fine of rs. 1000 ..... is whether the provisions of rule 22 are directory or mandatory. if they are directory, as contended by mr. agarwal, the learned counsel appearing for the municipal corporation, in view of the report of the public analyst, it will have to be held that the accused has committed the offence.4. rule 22 was required to ..... formalities, the food inspector made three packets of 100 grams each and sent one of the packets to the public analyst, and the report of the public analyst was to the effect that the alcoholic content in the asafoetida was 3.77 per cent, whereas 5 pr cent, was the required quantity under the act, as stated .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 29 1995 (SC)

Parimal Chandra and ors. Vs. Life Insurance Corporation of India and o ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : (1996)1CALLT22(SC); JT1995(3)SC288; (1995)IILLJ339SC; 1995(2)SCALE518; 1995Supp(2)SCC611; [1995]3SCR34; 1995(2)LC505(SC); (1995)2UPLBEC846

..... any effect on the status of the affected workmen who had become workmen of the corporation. even assuming that the scheme of the food corporation act, 1964 permits the corporation to engage a contractor, the act would not permit the corporation, which is an instrumentality of the state comprehended in the expression 'other authority' in ..... article 12, to act in a manner thoroughly arbitrary by first keeping a contractor, removing ..... the finding of the high court and dismissed the petition.in workmen of the food corporation of india v. food corporation of india : (1985)iillj4sc , initially the work of handling foodgrains at siliguri depot of the respondent- corporation was entrusted by it to a contractor.the contractor engaged handling-mazdoors for the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 09 1988 (HC)

Geethanjali Mills Ltd. and ors. Vs. V. Thiruvengadathan

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (1988)74CTR(Mad)115

..... prosecution, learned consul for the petitioners would rely upon section 41a of the state financial corporations act of 1951 as well as section 30a of the industrial development bank of india act of 1964. section 41a of the state financial corporations act of 1951 reads as follows : 'no suit, prosecution or other legal proceeding shall lie ..... to quote the provisions of section 30a of the industrial development bank of india act of 1964, as the provisions of that section are also couched in the same language as that of section 41a of the state financial corporations act of 1951. to counter this argument, the revenue would place reliance on section ..... learned counsel for the revenue, viz., that the income-tax act, being a special enactment, will have the effect of overriding the provisions of the state financial corporations act of 1951 and the other allied enactment, namely, the industrial development bank of india act of 1964, and, therefore, learned counsel for the petitioner cannot at .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //