Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: food corporations act 1964 section 18 capital of state food corporation Sorted by: old Page 1 of about 8,121 results (2.816 seconds)

Maharashtra State Electricity Board, Bombay Vs. Its Workmen (Excluding ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : (1968)IILLJ552Bom

..... trust under s. 4. the industrial finance corporation act. 1948 [23 of 1948 (?)], refers to share capital and shareholders under s. 4. the food corporation act, 1964 (37 of 1964), refers to capital of the corporation under s. 5. in the same way the state bank of india act, 1955 (23 of 1955), the life insurance corporation act, 1956 (31 of 1956), the deposit insurance corporation act, 1961 (47 of 1961), and the ..... oil and natural gas commission act, 1959 (43 of 1959), all refers to capital .....

Food Corporation of India Vs. Commissioner of Sales Tax and anr.

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : [1988]69STC374(All)

..... be, which shall be determined in such manner as may be prescribed.(2) ...(3) ...(4) ...(5) ...5. the food corporation of india is a 'corporation' incorporated under the food corporations act, 1964 (central act no. 37 of 1964). as one of its functions it maintains a national pool of foodgrains. the different states have to make their contributions to ..... interest of producer as well as consumer. then a reference has been made to section 6 of the food corporations act, 1964, which provides that the board of directors, in discharging its functions, shall act on business principles having regard to the interests of the producer and consumer. a reference has also been ..... india discharges governmental function, the learned counsel for the petitioner has taken us through the different provisions of the food corporations act, 1964. section 5 provides that the original capital of corporation shall be such sum not exceeding one hundred crores of rupees as the central government may fix. sub-section ( .....

In Re: Magnaquest Solutions Private Limited, a Company Incorporated Un ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : (2008)3CompLJ345(AP); [2007]80SCL496(AP)

..... every description. under clause (b), while a transferee company does not include any company, other than a company within the meaning of the companies act, the transferor company includes any body corporate whether a company or not. section 394a requires the court to give notice of every application made to it, under sections 391 or 394, ..... trading with the enemy where the test of control is adopted. (tata engineering and locomotive co. ltd. v. the state of bihar : [1964]6scr885 ; palmer's company law)20. in dhn food distributors ltd. v. london borough of tower hamlets (1976)3 all er 462, lord denning quoted with approval the statement in gower's company ..... an argument in re mercatoria , and it must be construed in the light of the facts and realities of the situation.'22. the aforesaid judgments, in which the corporate veil was lifted, were quoted with approval by the supreme court in delhi development authority v. skipper construction co. (p) ltd. : air1996sc2005 and new horizons limited v .....

Chisholm Vs. Georgia

Court : US Supreme Court

..... before it. it derives its authority from the same pure and sacred source as itself: the voluntary and deliberate choice of the people. 2nd. a corporation can do no act but what is subject to the revision either of a court of justice or of some other authority within the government. a state is altogether exempt ..... where the general government has power derived from the constitution itself. 3rd. a corporation is altogether dependant on that government to which it owes its existence. its charter may be forfeited by abuse. its authority may be annihilated, without abuse, by an act of the legislative body. a state, though subject in certain specified particulars to ..... that states ought to be so considered for that purpose, an act of the legislature is necessary to give effect to such a construction, unless the old doctrine concerning corporations will naturally apply to this particular case. 3rd. that, as it is evident the act of congress has not made any special provision in this case, grounded .....

Ware Vs. Hylton

Court : US Supreme Court

..... 223 british debts contracted before the war. it is worthy of remembrance that delegates and representatives were elected, by the people of the several counties and corporations of virginia to meet in general convention for the purpose of framing a new government by the authority of the people only, and that the said convention ..... debt in the declaration mentioned was personal property within this commonwealth, belonging to a british subject at the time of the passing of the said act entitled 'an act concerning escheats and forfeitures from british subjects,' and the defendants in fact also say that the debt in the declaration mentioned is a demand originally ..... aforesaid, the legislature of the state of virginia did, at its session commenced and held in the city of williamsburg on 3 may, 1779, pass an act entitled 'an act concerning escheats and forfeitures from british subjects,' whereby it was, among other things enacted," " that all the property, real and personal, within this commonwealth .....

United States Vs. 1,960 Bags of Coffee

Court : US Supreme Court

..... or the barbaric character of the times; yet even as to cases of treason and felony, a striking distinction is admitted in favor of goods and chattels, and mesne acts before conviction or inquisition are suffered to retain their actual validity. " page 12 u. s. 416 "looking to the vast extent of commercial transfers, the favor with ..... of a bona fide purchaser, and mr. justice willes, in delivering the opinion of the court, in alluding to the argument that the forfeiture attached the moment the act was done, said 'it may be so as to some purposes, as to prevent intermediate alienations and encumbrances.' to be sure, this expression carries with it a ..... nor whether it shall be incapable of being purged by subsequent events. the forfeitures under the statute are to be distributed in the same manner as forfeitures under the collection act of 2 march, 1799, 91, by which informers and officers of the customs, as well as the government, may acquire vested interests, and it follows therefore that .....

Trustees of Dartmouth Coll. Vs. Woodward

Court : US Supreme Court

..... , says he, "a franchise for a number of persons to be incorporated and exist as a body politic, with a power to maintain perpetual succession, and to do corporate acts, and each individual of such corporation is also said to have a franchise, or freedom." this franchise, like other franchises, is an incorporeal hereditament, issuing out of something real or personal, or concerning ..... ," says mr. justice blackstone, "for a number of persons to be incorporated and subsist as a body politic, with power to maintain perpetual succession, and do other corporate acts, and each individual member of such corporation is also said to have a franchise or freedom." 2 bl.com. 37; 1 kyd on corp. 14, 16. in order to get rid of the legal .....

Society for Propagation of the Gospel Vs. Town of New Haven

Court : US Supreme Court

..... confided to it in the best manner for promoting the benevolent and laudable objects of its incorporation. it may further be remarked that the effect of this act is not merely to deprive the corporation of its legal control over the charity, so far as respects the property in question, but to destroy the trusts altogether by transferring the property to other ..... even to be admitted that the legislature of vermont was competent to pronounce a sentence of forfeiture of the property belonging to this corporation upon the ground of its having abused or not used its franchises, still the act of 1794 does not profess to have proceeded upon that ground. the only reasons assigned in the page 21 u. s. 485 preamble .....

Green Vs. Biddle

Court : US Supreme Court

..... compact between different states of the union. the prohibition of the constitution embraces all contracts, executed or executory, between private individuals, or a state and individuals or corporations, or between the states themselves. page 21 u. s. 3 this was a writ of right, brought in the circuit court of kentucky by the demandants, ..... of powers which the people have forbidden their legislature to exercise. to constitute the sovereign and independent state of kentucky was unquestionably the leading object of the act of virginia of 18 december, 1789. to exercise unlimited legislative power over the territory within her own limits is one of the essential attributes of that ..... any court should blend and confound them. these considerations lead me to the conclusion that the defendant is not entitled to judgment under either of the acts under consideration, even admitting them to be constitutional; but if under either, certainly under that alone which has been adopted into the practice of the .....

Bank of the United States Vs. Dandridge

Court : US Supreme Court

..... reasons of public convenience and individual safety and protection would not be promoted by establishing it. on the other hand, every case which has been adduced to show that corporate acts need not always be reduced to writing, but may be proved by presumptions, is a fortiori an authority against the argument. there are, however, some cases which ..... this distinction, he supposes, will reconcile all the cases. the distinction, if admitted, will not aid the argument. it may be, and indeed is conceded, that no corporate act can be valid if done differently from the manner prescribed by law as essential to its validity. if in the present case the statute had prescribed that nothing but a ..... are binding, and of course written memorandums made by such officer in pursuance of orders of the board, whether on the note itself or in a book, is a corporate act, is written evidence of such order of the board of direct is as the writing imports. the counsel for the defendant has, i think, shown from "the .....