Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: food corporations act 1964 section 18 capital of state food corporation Court: kolkata Page 1 of about 214 results (0.106 seconds)

Food Corporation of India Vs. Central Government Industrial Tribunal a ...

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : (2001)IILLJ167Cal

..... ) regulations, 1978 by virtue of the power conferred under section 45 of the food corporation act, 1964 ('act') can be referred to as a dispute in terms of section 10(l)(d) of the industrial disputes act, 1947.2. the petitioner is a body corporate established by the act and section 45 of the act empowers the petitioner to make regulation by notification in the official gazette with the ..... made by a state food corporation under this act may be made by the food corporation of india within three months from the establishment of such state food corporation, and any regulation so made may be altered or rescinded by the food corporation concerned in the exercise of its power under this act'3. by dint of the power conferred under section 45 of the act, the food corporation of india rules, 1965 .....

F.C.i. and anr. Vs. Assistant Labour Commissioner (Central) and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : 2007(4)CHN191,(2008)ILLJ1107Cal

..... circumstances of the present case. the dcrg regulations was made in the year 1967 under the food corporation act, 1964 for providing payment of gratuity to the employees. dcrg regulations continued even after the payment of gratuity act, 1972 came into force in respect of such of the employees of the f.c.i. ..... be decided by alc. mr. sengupta further submits that the employee concerned has been claiming benefit under food corporation of india (death-cum-retirement gratuity) regulations, 1967 (hereinafter referred to as regulations) and not under the act and therefore, assistant labour commissioner (hereinafter referred to as alc) cannot decide the same. according to ..... appeals are summarised hereunder:(i) the payment of gratuity act deals with payment of gratuity under the said act. the claim made by the concerned employees herein are not under the said act but in terms of explanation 4 to regulation 4(3) under the food corporation of india (death-cum-retirement gratuity) regulations, 1967 .....

Corporation of Calcutta Vs. Calcutta Wholesale Consumers Co-operative ...

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : AIR1970Cal120,1970CriLJ340

..... the petition of complaint shows that it is the calcutta corporation. the food inspector was not authorised by the calcutta corporation, a local authority, but was authorised by the health officer of the calcutta corporation. under section 20(1) of the prevention of food adulteration act, 1954 any person authorised by a local authority may file ..... the consent of the health officer of the calcutta corporation. the health officer of the calcutta corporation is not a local authority. the complainant dr. r. chandra is the food inspector appointed by the state government under section 9 of the prevention of food adulteration act for the whole of calcutta and he describes himself ..... as complainant under the direction and with the consent of the health officer of the calcutta corporation. section 20(1) of the prevention of food adulteration act, 1954 reads as follows :--'no prosecution for an offence under this act shall be instituted except by, or with the written consent of, the state government or .....

Model Electric Oil Mills and ors. Vs. Corporation of Calcutta

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : AIR1960Cal388,1960CriLJ817,63CWN776

..... have been repealed with effect from 1-6-1955, when the prevention of food adulteration act came into force, and that therefore, even if section 442 of the calcutta municipal act were applicable to an oil mill, the calcutta corporation no longer had jurisdiction to require a license under section 442 of the calcutta ..... if immediately before the commencement of this act there is in force in any state to which this act extends, any law corresponding to this act, thatcorresponding law shall upon such commencement stand repealed'.the prevention of food adulteration act came into force on 1-6-1955. therefore the calcutta corporation authorities had jurisdiction to ask for ..... aerated water factory, ice factory or other place where food is sold or prepared for sale. the corporation authorities claimed that since in the oil mill, mustard oil, which is an article of food according to the definition contained in section 5, clause 33 of the act, is prepared for sale, a license is required under .....

Rampada Majhi Vs. Nagendranath Chakravarty

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : 1968CriLJ557

..... referred to.5. section 20 of the prevention of food adulteration act provides for sanction of prosecution by the local authority and section 2(viii) defines the municipality as that authority. bengal municipal act provides as to how a municipality, a body corporate acts in normal times and also when the chairman and ..... the commissioners are superseded. the two provisions may stand together and are not in conflict; indeed, the provisions are complementary to each other. therefore the question either of conflict or of the state act amending or extending the definition of local authority in the prevention of food adulteration act ..... local authority of the municipality within the meaning of section 2(viii) of the prevention of food adulteration act. section 15 of the bengal municipal act says that 'such commission era shall be a body corporate by the name of the municipal councils of the place.having perpetual succession and a common .....

Santi Ranjan Paul Vs. Food Corporation of India and ors.

Court : Kolkata

..... ineligible is valid and legal or not, it is necessary to look into the opening paragraph of the notice inviting tender. it reads thus:on behalf of food corporation of india, the general manager (wb) regional office (west bengal), invites sealed offer of rates from past or existing transport contractor (tc)/handling & transport contractor ..... other organizations. admittedly, the petitioner did not execute any such contract with other organizations. therefore, the committee on being directed by the dgm (r) acted within its authority in seeking to explore the petitioner's eligibility afresh. further examination by the committee revealed that the petitioner had not executed transport contract during ..... fulfilment of that policy is fair. it is only concerned with the manner in which those decisions have been taken. the extent of the duty to act fairly will vary from case to case. shortly put, the grounds upon which an administrative action is subject to control by judicial review can be classified .....

Durgamata Oil Mill and anr. Vs. the Corporation of Calcutta

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : 1978CriLJ222

..... in spite of that he has convicted the firm. now the company has been defined in section 17 which says that for this section it means any body-corporate and includes e. firm or other association of individuals. clearly, therefore, the firm before us being a partnership firm comes under the definition of the company. ..... hereinafter referred to as the firm and kishori mohan roy have been convicted under section 16(1)(a)(i) read with section 7(i) of the prevention of food adulteration act, 1954, by the additional chief presidency magistrate vested with first class powers. the appellant no. 2. kishori mohan roy, has been sentenced to suffer rigorous imprisonment ..... . banerjee, learned counsel on behalf of the appellants, mr. bose for the corporation of calcutta and mr. mukherjee for the state.4. the first contention raised on the side of the appellant no. 1, the firm, is that the learned magistrate acted without jurisdiction and illegally to convict the firm in the absence of any charge against .....

Voltas Limited and ors. Vs. Hiralal Agarwalla and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : (1991)1CALLT459(HC),[1991]71CompCas273(Cal),1991CriLJ609

..... day-to-day business of the company, process could not have been issued against them.' the case of municipal corporation of delhi v. ram kishan, : 1983crilj159 , is also a case under the prevention of food adulteration act. the case was instituted against the company, its directors and manager. there were no clear allegations against the manager ..... counsel for the opposite party, has referred to a decision of the supreme court in municipal corporation of delhi v. purshotam dass jhunjunwala, : 1983crilj172 , as his trump card. it was also a case under the prevention of food adulteration act in which the directors of a sugar mill were sought to be prosecuted for manufacturing adulterated milk ..... such complaint was held bad in law. a similar question arose in the case of g. atherton and co. v. corporation of calcutta [1979] crl. lj 86 (cal). it was a case under the prevention of food adulteration act and this court was urged to decide whether, by virtue of the provisions under section 17 of the .....

National Textile Corporation (Wbabo) Ltd. and anr. Vs. the Learned Jud ...

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : (2007)2CALLT567(HC),[2007(115)FLR1097]

..... of india established under section 3 of the unit trust of india act (52 of 1963), or the food corporation of india established under section 3, or a board of management established for two or more contiguous states under section 16, of the food corporations act, 1964 (37 of 1964), or 2 [the airports authority of india act, 1994 (55 of 1994)], or a regional rural bank established under ..... section 3 of the regional rural banks act, 1976 (21 of 1976), or the export credit and guarantee corporation limited or the industrial reconstruction bank of india limited], 3-[the .....

Food Corporation of India and ors. Vs. Assistant Labour Commissioner-i ...

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : (2007)2CALLT331(HC)

..... regularly appointed under regulation 7(1) of the food corporation of india (staff) regulation, 1971. regulation 4 of the said regulation provided the circumstances under which ..... not bear any liability in respect of the service rendered prior to the date of permanent absorption in the corporation regarding the regulations it was submitted that those were promulgated in exercise of the powers conferred by section 45 of the food corporation of india act, 1964 with the previous sanction of the central government for payment of gratuity to all employees of the fci .....