Following Surface - Judgment Search Results

Jk Surface Coatings Pvt Ltd Through Amitab Sen Vs. The State of Jharkh ...

Court: Jharkhand

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. M.P. No. 2588 of 2015 --- JK Surface Coatings Pvt. Ltd Company, through Amitab Sen … … Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Labour … Bihar and another reported in [1996 (1) East Cr C333(pat) (RB)]. Section 305 of the Cr.P.C. reads as follows:- 305. Procedure when corporation or registered society is an accused.- (1) In this section “corporation” means an incorporated

Maharia Re-surfacing and Constructions (P.) Ltd. and Another Vs. Great ...

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: 1999(1)AWC122

of Greater Noida which has been duly approved by the U. P. Government and which was regularly being followed by the respondent No. 1 with other contractors. In paragraph 2.b of the said letter, it has been

thermax Surface Coatings Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise,

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Matched in: Parties thermax Surface Coatings Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise,

thermax Surface Coating Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise,

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Reported in: (2002)(145)ELT356Tri(Mum.)bai

that the benefit is not available since the goods were used by some other persons in the factory.4. Following the ratio of the above two orders, we hold that the appellants herein are entitled to the benefit

thermax Surface Coatings Ltd. Vs. Joint Commissioner of

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Pune

Reported in: (2007)104ITD199(Pune.)

in the case of CIT V.Sudarshan Chemicals Industries (2000) 245 ITR 769 in favour of the assessee. Respectfully following that decision, we are of the view that excise duty and sales tax collected by the assessee should … to deduction Under Section 80 IA in respect of profits of eligible industrial undertaking for the manufacture of surface coating systems.3.2 In this connection, it was represented by the assessee before the AO that its sales engineer

Anagha Surface Transport Pvt. Ltd. Vs. the Commissioner of Central Exc ...

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT

vide Final Order No. 711/08 dated 19.06.2008 remanded the matter to the original authority for fresh consideration after following the principles of natural justice. 3.2. In pursuance of the Tribunal’s remand order, the original authority vide order … 1.1.Appeal No. ST/156/2010 is by M/s. Anagha Surface Transport Pvt. Ltd. against the order of the Commissioner (Appeals) No. 27/2009 (T) S.T. dated 18.09.2009. 1.2.Appeal No.

Surface Graphics Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Reported in: (2000)(119)ELT622Tri(Mum.)bai

1. M/s. Surface Graphics Private Limited, the appellant in appeal before us is the registered unit manufacturing printed cartons. In the … will be dealt with at the appropriate stage.4. The constitutions of the three units in question are as follows: SGPL is a private limited company, its directors at the relevant time being H.G. Shetty, S.M. Shetty and

State of Kerala Vs. Surface Coats, Neelimangalam

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: JT1998(7)SC612; 1996(2)KLT832(SC); (1998)9SCC356

were levied. When the matter came to the High Court, the High Court allowed the appeals on the following ground: the charge against the assessee was one of filing 'untrue or incorrect return' within the meaning of

Aromal Auto Craft vs Ministry of Surface Transports

Court: Kerala

WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 20.01.2023, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C)No.40234/2022 6JUDGMENTApplications have been filed by the parties who are being affected by the interim order, for impleadment, … ITS PROPRIETOR, AROMAL MANOJ, PANAPETTY, PORUVAZHY P.O., BHARANIKAVU, KOLLAM-690520. BY ADV I.DINESH MENON RESPONDENTS: 1 THE MINISTRY OF SURFACE TRANSPORTS[MoRTH], REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, NEW DELHI - 110001. 2 STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED

Prabhat Kumar Patra Vs. West Bengal Surface Transport Corporation Ltd. ...

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: 2004(2)CHN411

learned Advocate, appearing on behalf of the petitioner, by drawing attention to the Regulation of the West Bengal Surface Transport Corporation Ltd., points out that according to Regulation 4(d), 'probationary' means an employee employed on trial against