First - Judgment Search Results

A. K. Bashu Sahib Vs. First Income-tax Officer, Vellore.

Court: Chennai

Reported in: [1967]66ITR20(Mad)

..... for the assessee is that he is entitled to pay even the first installment of the advance tax demanded in accordance with this estimate we ..... date on which that installment became due this is clear from the first part of section 212 1 which is followed up in section ..... sent on september 1 1962 itself he is entitled to pay the first installment due on that date in accordance with his estimate this .....

Nellal Cotton Mills Vs. First Income-tax Officer, Tirunelveli.

Court: Chennai

Reported in: [1968]70ITR66(Mad)

..... petitions before us under article 226 of the constitution the one for direction forbidding the 1st income tax officer tirunelveli from reopening the assessment of the petitioner for the assessment year ..... officer made that order because this court declined to make any interim order pending the first writ petition but permitted him to proceed with reassessment the assessee who is the petitioner .....

United States Vs. First City Nat'l Bank of Houston

Court: US Supreme Court

..... 651 united states v philadelphia national bank supra united states v first nat bank supra we have found no indication that congress ..... finance of the house committee on banking and currency 89th cong 1st sess 11 the president of the american bankers association declared ..... subcommittee of the senate committee on banking and currency 89th cong 1st sess 63 senator robertson stated you are dealing with a .....

Cotmac Private Ltd. Vs. Commercial Tax Officer, 1st Circle, Hubli and ...

Court: Karnataka

Reported in: (1967)1MysLJ440; [1967]20STC20(Kar)

..... the year ended 31st march 1962 the commercial tax officer 1st circle hubli the 1st respondent herein made an order of assessment under the central ..... act 3 the petitioner complains that the adjustment so proposed by the 1st respondent is not in accordance with law and that he having ..... 20 936 02 found as excess paid in the order of the 1st respondent made under the central sales tax act be refunded to .....

Sri Hari Mills, Ltd., Coimbatore Vs. the First Income-tax Officer, Coi ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: AIR1967Mad427; [1967]65ITR348(Mad)

..... of the petition it is contended that the view of the first respondent cannot be supported learned counsel for the petitioner candidly ..... than the losses due to depreciation it follows therefore that the first respondent was not correct in his view that depreciation would fall ..... that was pressed before us for the petitioner was that the first respondent was not correct in his view that depreciation was .....

State of Punjab and anr. Vs. Associated Hotels of India Ltd.

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Reported in: [1967]20STC1(P& H)

..... letters patent appeal is the correctness of the learned single judge s decision on the first point 5 the learned single judge has analysed the essential ingredients of a sale as .....

Payen and Talbros Ltd. Vs. Hans Raj and ors.

Court: Delhi

Reported in: 4(1968)DLT130

..... is nto open to the petitioner company to raise this plea of fact for the first time in these proceedings 17 the learned counsel for the petitioner lastly urged that the .....

B. Party No. 2: Alingal Mohamed Kutty Vs. A. Party: Vaniyanthodi Pathu ...

Court: Kerala

Reported in: AIR1968Ker70; 1968CriLJ351

..... party no 2 in m c 15 of 1966 on the file of the executive first class magistrate of malappuram is the revision petitioner the dispute relates to 2 acres and .....

Lakshmikutty Amma and ors. Vs. Narayana Pillai Velayudha Pillai and or ...

Court: Kerala

Reported in: AIR1968Ker57

t c raghavan j 1 defendants 2 to 4 and the legal representatives of the first defendant are the appellants and the plaintiffs the contesting respondents the suit was for eviction .....

Meattles Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax, Delhi and Rajasthan.

Court: Delhi

Reported in: [1968]68ITR79(Delhi)

..... attention to certain decisions of the english courts we shall now refer to them the first decision read to us is that of the court of appeal in inland revenue commissioners .....