Skip to content


First - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: first Year: 1922 Page 1 of about 301 results (0.119 seconds)
Feb 27 1922 (FN)

Smietanka Vs. First Trust and Savings Bank

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Feb-27-1922

..... for the present respondent in an action to recover a tax the district court had first sustained a demurrer to the declaration but later pursuant to a mandate of reversal see ..... u s 602 1922 u s supreme court smietanka v first trust savings bank 257 u s 602 1922 smietanka v first trust savings bank no 540 argued january 19 1922 decided .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Feb 27 1922 (FN)

Bank of Jasper Vs. First Nat'l Bank of Rome

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Feb-27-1922

..... the contention that the decrees constitute personal judgments against the first national bank rests upon the assertion that under the law ..... certificates of deposit and these had been transferred to the first national bank such certificates are merely promissory notes of the ..... not even an allegation either that the transfer to the first national bank had been made after maturity of the certificates .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 20 1922 (FN)

First National Bank Vs. J. L. Mott Iron Works

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Mar-20-1922

..... bank v j l mott iron works 258 u s 240 1922 first national bank v j l mott iron works no 159 argued march 10 1922 decided .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 10 1922 (FN)

First National Bank Vs. Adams

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Apr-10-1922

..... to banks amounting to 75 150 belonging to and owned by first national bank of gulfport has escaped taxation during each of the ..... board of supervisors page 258 u s 364 to assess the first national bank of gulfport mississippi with capital stock surplus undivided profits ..... 1907 which said property was at said time owned by said first national bank and which had escaped taxation for each of the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Nov 06 1922 (PC)

In Re: a First Grade Pleader Vs.  

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Nov-06-1922

Reported in: AIR1923Mad485; 73Ind.Cas.329

x viii of 1879 section 13 b g giving wrong information to client professional misconduct absence of fraud costs a professional

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 20 1922 (PC)

Tadi Bulli Tammireddi, and Tadi Harinarayanareddi, Minor by Father and ...

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Jan-20-1922

Reported in: AIR1922Mad236; (1922)42MLJ570

..... the plaintiff as laid in the plaint is that the 1st defendant with the object of defrauding the plaintiff showed differences ..... opinion that the direction of the subordinate judge that the 1st defendant is to account for the management from october 1916 ..... instructions for the management of the family affairs and that the 1st defendant was transacting business after informing gangi reddi and getting .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 04 1922 (PC)

In Re: Erada Padinharedil Govindan Nair and anr.

Court: Chennai

Decided on: May-04-1922

Reported in: (1922)43MLJ396

..... impliedly taken away in our judgment this is not sound for three reasons in the first place section 491 merely substitutes or adds for the presidency towns a different form of .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 11 1922 (PC)

In Re: Arumuga Mudaliar and anr.

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Aug-11-1922

Reported in: AIR1923Mad59; (1922)43MLJ564

..... must be made to a magistrate there being no such complaint in this case the 1st magistrate was right in rejecting the case sought to be made under section 498 of .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 01 1922 (PC)

S.N. Raghunathasami Iyengar and anr. Vs. S. Gopaul Rao and ors.

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Sep-01-1922

Reported in: (1922)43MLJ622

..... the amount or value of the subject matter of the suit in the court of first instance construing that in the manner most favourable to the proposed appellant was at the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 01 1922 (PC)

P.S. Narayana Aiyar Vs. Biyari Bivi Alias Kathun Bivi and ors.

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Aug-01-1922

Reported in: (1922)43MLJ559

..... and we allowed it 2 the advocate general on behalf of 3rd defendant the appellant first asked us to postpone the re hearing until he had appealed to the privy council .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.

Sign-up to get more results

Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.

Start Free Trial

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //