Firm Name - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: firm name Page 1 of about 1,625 results (0.016 seconds)Firm Chunni Lal Mansa Ram Through L. Vidya Ram Vs. Firm Sheo Prasad Ba ...
Court: Allahabad
Reported in: AIR1943All370
the defendant's mill (that is Sidh Nath) that the defendant firm had become somewhat careless in complying with its requests about rightly held that such evidence as Sidh Nath did give, namely, that the defendant firm all along told him that they
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTFirm Poonamchand Shankarlal and Co., Bombay Vs. Firm Deepchand Sireyma ...
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Reported in: AIR1972MP40
showing that the goods pledged were in possession of that firm. But more than that in the present case it is notice or knowledge that the goods stood insured in the name of the plaintiff-firm. Thirdly, even if the. policies of insurance
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTFirm Bachhraj Amolakchand and anr. Vs. Firm Nandlal Sitaram and ors.
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Reported in: AIR1966MP145
refused to take delivery and claimed damages from the plaintiff firm, charging it with breach of contract. Thereupon, the plaintiff firm
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT(Firm) Danmal Parshotam Dass Vs. (Firm) Babu Ram-chhote Lal
Court: Allahabad
Reported in: AIR1936All3
to have been a partner in the firm unless the firm is registered and the person suing is or has been intention was to allow time to people, trading under the name of an unregistered firm, to come to know of the
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTFirm Kirpa Ram Sita Ram Vs. Firm Mangal Sen Bishan Mal
Court: Allahabad
Reported in: AIR1922All367; 65Ind.Cas.93
firm's name but as individuals and proprietors of the contracting firm in Delhi and also proprietors of the other firm in additional partner was a member of the firm in Cawnpore, namely, one Jugal Kishore, and at one time, he distinctly held
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT(Firm) Meghraj-roormal Vs. (Firm) Anup Singh-battu Mal
Court: Allahabad
Reported in: AIR1935All1004
Champa Ram v. Tulshi Ram 1927 All. 617.2. The defendant firm entered into certain forward contracts for the purchase of grain-pits
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTFirm Meghraj Roormal Vs. Firm Anup Singh-battu Mal
Court: Allahabad
Reported in: 159Ind.Cas.984
there is no escape from the conclusion that the plaintiff firm was within its rights in selling the grain-pits on February
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTFirm Paras Ram Ram Sarup and ors. Vs. Firm Baldev Sahai Ram Bhagat and ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Reported in: AIR1963P& H215
or authority to restrict the application of Section 63(2) to firms with more than two partners, and such a distinction cannot and Sham Sunder became the partners of the firm. The name of the firm, however, remained the same. The counsel for
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTFirm Munshi Ram Ruplal Vs. Firm Madanlal Chaman Parkash Sethi and ors.
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Reported in: AIR1960P& H15
(1) The facts giving rise to this second appeal are as follows: Plaintiff-firm is working as commission agents at Jullundur...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTFirm Des Raj Prem Chand and anr. Vs. Firm Hira Lal Kali Ram and anr.
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Reported in: AIR1952P& H415
place which described itself in the plaint as the registered firm Hira Lal-Kali Ram 'alias' Krishna Dehati Store.2. The plaintiff's case
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>