Skip to content


Finding - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: finding Year: 2005 Page 1 of about 300 results (0.096 seconds)
Jan 03 2005 (TRI)

Magna Laboratories (Gujarat) Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on: Jan-03-2005

..... show cause notice is binding on the department and the adjudicating authorities cannot record a finding contrary to such an admission eros metal works v collector 1989 43 elt 361 t .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 11 2005 (TRI)

National Cement Corporation Vs. Cce

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Mar-11-2005

Reported in: (2005)(100)ECC433

..... ordinary potland cement and as such deserves classification under sub heading 2502 90 2 we find that the issue already stand settled in favour of the appellants by the tribunal judgment .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 11 2005 (TRI)

La Grande Projects Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Customs

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on: Mar-11-2005

Reported in: (2005)(185)ELT314Tri(Mum.)bai

..... behalf of his present clients 6 in view of what has been discussed above we find no reason to restore the appeal none of the averments made before us as to .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 11 2005 (TRI)

Asian Techs. Ltd. and Geo-tech Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on: Mar-11-2005

Reported in: (2005)(186)ELT183Tri(Mum.)bai

..... 40 elt 276 sc does not help its case as in the appellants case we find that it is not a mere inaction on their part which is being relied upon .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 11 2005 (TRI)

Automats India and Asra and Sudhir Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on: Mar-11-2005

..... determine the facts after complying with principals of natural justice 5 in view of the findings the appeals are to be allowed as remand after setting aside the orders

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 11 2005 (TRI)

Blue Circle Corporation Vs. Commissioner of Customs

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on: Mar-11-2005

Reported in: (2005)(184)ELT387Tri(Mum.)bai

..... the noting of the commissioner dated 18 11 98 in the file reads as i find from the portion marked x of nsv that the ao had correctly suggested the date .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 11 2005 (TRI)

Velmurugan Engineering Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu

Decided on: Mar-11-2005

Reported in: (2005)(187)ELT371Tri(Chennai)

..... t 85 tri 4 countering the arguments shri a jayachandran learned departmental representative reiterated the findings as contained in the impugned order and submitted that one shri ravinder had floated both .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 11 2005 (TRI)

Aarvee Denims and Exports Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Mar-11-2005

Reported in: (2005)(186)ELT297TriDel

..... fabrics by them 4 we have heard both sides and gone through the record we find that no fresh evidence had been collected in order to corroborate the disclosure of the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 10 2005 (TRI)

Wintech Inc. Vs. Commissioner of Customs

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu

Decided on: Mar-10-2005

Reported in: (2005)(184)ELT383Tri(Chennai)

..... loan 3 we have also heard smt r bhagya devi ld sdr who reiterated the findings as contained in the impugned order and emphasized that the documents which came into possession .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 11 2005 (TRI)

Bcl Springs Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on: Mar-11-2005

Reported in: (2005)(185)ELT56Tri(Mum.)bai

..... from wire rod were not required to pay duty on the drawn wire 3 we find that when the matter had come up earlier it was argued that irrespective of the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.

Sign-up to get more results

Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.

Start Free Trial

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //