Finance Act 2003 Section 166 - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: finance act 2003 section 166 Sorted by: recent Page 1 of about 564 results (2.059 seconds)Muthoot Finance Limited Vs. The State Of Karnataka
Court : Karnataka
govindaraj writ petition no 36201 of2024 gm police between muthoot finance limited a company incorporated under the companies act1956head office at 30 12 2024 and quash the same and all consequential actions taken against the petitioner thereafter interest of justice and equity 454 of the earlier code of criminal procedure and now section 500 of the bnss were to be filed of course
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMr. Gaurav K Bhandari Vs. Mr. Bharath Chandrashekhar
Court : Karnataka
to file proceedings under section 11 of the a c act which finally came to be allowed on 11 11 2024 application 5 where a caveat has been lodged under sub section 1 such caveat shall not remain in force after the
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBrindavan Hydropower Private Limited Vs. Union Of India
Court : Karnataka
needs to be provided without carry over to the next financially year comments received special secretary gok is of the view licensing transmission distribution tariff etc under the provisions of the act 55 the electricity act has been divided into xviii parts accordance with its directions in extraordinary circumstances 75 thus the 2003 act basically unshackled the electricity industry and permitted any person subsidies under the third proviso to sub section 2 of section 42 120 nc 2024 khc 53048 wp no 11235 of in their generation of electricity being unviable for commercial exploitation 166 consequently the law provides for such generator to utilise the
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTM/s Asset Reconstruction Company (india) Limited Vs. The Senior Sub Re ...
Court : Karnataka
company under section 3 of the securitization and reconstruction of financial assets and enforcement of security interest act 2002 hereinafter referred aparment sankey road bengaluru 560052 for kind information and appropriate action 16 nc 2024 khc 53360 wp no 28962 of 2015 passed by the senior sub registrar peenya bangalore as per section 33 of the karnataka stamp act 1957 b to declare
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTAsset Reconstruction Company (india) Limited Vs. The Senior Sub Regist ...
Court : Karnataka
company under section 3 of the securitization and reconstruction of financial assets and enforcement of security interest act 2002 hereinafter referred only if compliance is made of the requirement of the act and rules that the document will proceed for registration a passed by the senior sub registrar peenya bangalore as per section 33 of the karnataka stamp act 1957 b to declare
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSri.k. Lokesh Vs. The Bangalore District Maintenance And Welfare Of Pa ...
Court : Karnataka
exposed to emotional neglect and to lack of physical and financial support this clearly reveals that ageing has become a major the right to senior citizens under section 23 of the act is a personal right the right to protection under the others vs jain society protection of orphans india and others 2003 8 scc413 has held as 40 it is a well when it is alleged that the conditions mentioned in sub section 1 of section 23 are attached to a transfer existence
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTM/s. Asset Reconstruction Company (india) Limited Vs. The Senior Sub R ...
Court : Karnataka
company under section 3 of the securitization and reconstruction of financial assets and enforcement of security interest act 2002 hereinafter referred of 2017 instruments u s 33 of the k s act 1957 reg with reference to the above an instrument of passed by the senior sub registrar peenya bangalore as per section 33 of the karnataka stamp act 1957 b to declare
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBowring Institute Vs. Mr. Sarwik S
Court : Karnataka
and the same is in anticipation and no cause of action and other relief is sought for issuance of show cause the arbitration and conciliation act regarding interim relief exercising under section 9 also taken note of and also discussed in detail
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCyient Ltd Vs. Karnataka State Electronics Development
Court : Karnataka
be a company incorporated under the provisions of the companies act 1956 providing various software services the petitioner was originally incorporated
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSri. Chennakeshava Vs. The State Of Karnataka
Court : Karnataka
karnataka land reforms act 1961 inam abolition acts the bmrda act 1985 and karnataka sc st prohibition of transfer of certain government but not in respect of ipc offences and furthermore sections 3 and 4 of the act is very clear that
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT