Finance Act 2003 Section 166 - Judgment Search Results

Dharampal Satyapal Limited. Vs. Union of India

Court : Guwahati

by the applicant though reference of section 154 of the finance act 2003 read with schedule ix relatable amongst others to plea of non applicability of section 154 of the finance act 2003 schedule ix thereto and the rendering of the apex if the impact of section 154 of the finance act 2003 read with schedule ix thereto and the decision of the choudhury did not dispute the plea of non applicability of section 154 of the finance act 2003 schedule ix thereto and

M/S. Naihati Jute Mills Company Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excis ...

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Kolkata

been changed retrospectively by virtue of section 149 of the finance act 2003 in view of the above retrospective amendment i changed retrospectively by virtue of section 149 of the finance act 2003 in view of the above retrospective amendment i do retrospectively by virtue of section 149 of the finance act 2003 in view of the above retrospective amendment i do not that this position has been changed retrospectively by virtue of section 149 of the finance act 2003 in view of the

Greenply Industries Ltd. Vs. Cce

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in : (2006)(111)ECC151

date of assent of the bill by the president the finance bill 2003 received the assent of the president on 16 services received from goods transport operators and there was no action initiated against them for recovery of interest during the relevant receivers were required to file the returns by 17 11 2003 and discharge their service tax liability it can be seen the provisions of section 71 shall apply accordingly c in section 94 in sub section 2 after clause c the following

Mount Shivalik Industries Ltd. Vs. Cce and C

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

and sought to insert a new section 71a in the finance act 1994 with retrospective effect the section 158 would read in force at all material times and accordingly i any action taken or anything done or purported to have been taken 2003 received the assent of the president on 16 5 2003 this would imply that the service receiver were required to to a person referred to in the proviso to sub section 1 of section 68 for the filing of return in

Suhag Traders (P) Ltd. Vs. Income Tax Officer

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi

Reported in : (2008)114TTJ(Delhi)116

class by itself distinct from the other sub sections the finance bill of 2003 was basically based on the report of defined in explanation to section 36 1 va of the act the due date for deposit of epf is 15th of omission of second proviso to section 4313 by finance act 2003 14 it may however be mentioned that an issue regarding for filing of the return are entitled to relief under section 43b b of the it act 1961 he has pointed

The Additional Commissioner, Central Excise, Madurai Vs. M/s. Strategi ...

Court : Chennai Madurai

in relation to commissioning or installation the provisions of the finance act 1994 were intended to levy and collect taxes on pipes are fundamentallyused for carrying liquefied natural gas the finance act 2005specifically included plumbing drain laying or other installations fortransport of not form part of taxable services as on 01 07 2003 17 mr b vijay karthikeyan learned standing counsel for the 15 therefore it is clear that before the amendment to section 65 39a under finance act 2005 installation of plumbing drain

C.C.E. Vs. Gujarat Borisil Ltd.

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Ahmedabad

Reported in : (2007)13STT306

the finance act 1994 the amendment brought to the said finance act or the rules framed thereunder did not have the accordingly section 73 has also undergone certain amendments by finance act 2003 after the amendment section 73 reads as follows a finance act 2000 as well as amendment by finance act 2003 and came to the conclusion as follows 8 in view only on 3 4 2004 and the same was under section 73 of the finance act 1994 the amendment brought to

Commissioner of Central Excise, Delhi Vs. Action Construction Equipmen ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : 2006(201)ELT524(SC); 2006(7)SCALE225; (2006)6SCC75; 2006(2)LC942(SC)

2004 f no 387 67 99 jcgovernment of indiaministry of finance department of revenue central board of excise customs new delhisubject was examined his statement under section 14 of the 1944 act was recorded in which he confessed that no manufacturing activity this question as stated above vide order dated 22 9 2003 the appellate authority has held that the price charged by act has been amended by insertion of an explanation to section 4 1 to the effect that the price cum duty

Commissioner of Income-tax - II, Kanpur Vs. N.K. Laminates (P.) Ltd.

Court : Allahabad

position however has changed after the amendment made by the finance act of 2002 after which the assessment of undisclosed income for determination of undisclosed income under section 158bb of the act 10 in the present case no evidence was found relating in the case of smt amiya balla paul v cit 2003 262 itr 407 ignoring the amended provisions of section 142 said income shall not be included in the block period section 158bb 1 the undisclosed income of the block period shall

Tamilnadu Cements Corporation Vs. Commr. of C. Ex.

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu

Reported in : (2007)8STT492

the finance act 1994 the amendment brought to the said finance act or the rules framed thereunder did not have the finance act 2003 section 71a was inserted in the finance act 1994 this new provision cast a liability on recipients of on 12 5 2000 later on under the finance act 2003 section 71a was inserted in the finance act 1994 this 12 5 2000 later on under the finance act 2003 section 71a was inserted in the finance act 1994 this new