Finance Act 2003 Section 166 - Judgment Search Results

Commissioner of Income-tax - II, Kanpur Vs. N.K. Laminates (P.) Ltd.

Court : Allahabad

that the amendment of section 158bb brought about by the finance act of 2002 is merely clarificatory in the present case provisions of section 132b 8 chapter xiv b of the act is a special provision carved out by the legislature for pradesh high court in cit v khushlal chand nirmal kumar 2003 263 itr 77 and delhi high court in cit v in section 158bb and the provisions of section 142 sub sections 2 and 3 of section 143 section 144 and section

Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd.

Court : Allahabad

are for the period relating to pre amendment by the finance act 2003 hence this law is not applicable to the 28a read with section 194a 1 of the income tax act 45 in view of the above discussion we hold that 194a as stood before amendment w e f 1 6 2003 provides as under 194a 1 any person not being an under mact does not come with in the ambit of section 2 28a of the income tax act 1961 and therefore

State Electricity Board, U.P. Banda Vs. Prakash Talkies

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : AIR1977All460

reason of sub section 2 of section 24 of the act where any difference or dispute which by or under this for payment of the amount due sub section 2 of section 24 of the act which has been extracted above applies

Mohammad Ubed Ullah and ors. Vs. Mohammad Insha Allah Khan

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : AIR1921All287; 61Ind.Cas.138

that the application for revision is dismissed with costs contract act ix of 1872 section 131 guarantee continuing whether terminates on revision is dismissed with costs contract act ix of 1872 section 131 guarantee continuing whether terminates on death of guarantor it

Devi Prasad Sri Krishna Prasad Ltd. and anr. Vs. Secretary of State

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : AIR1941All377

was paid to plaintiff 2 by plaintiff 1 raised an action on 9th march 1933 in the court of the civil or against the secretary of state the terms of this section must be complied with it is also a matter of

Vijay Shankar Mishra Vs. State of U.P. and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : 1999CriLJ521

matter before the high court the order also gave him financial and administrative powers which were earlier exercised by the chief a public office and is charged with the duty of acting honestly impartiality and objectivity in the interest of administration of expression in his opinion occurring in sub section 4 of section 24 of the code it was urged that as the the report the hon ble supreme court observed at p 1663 of air as the facts narrated earlier show out of

Dalip Chand and ors. Vs. the Mukhya Nagar Adhikari and anr.

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : AIR1964All46

area included in the city section 577 a of the act reads as follows 577 a any appointment delegation notification notice in the executive field and not the legislative one sub section 1 of section 451 only deals with the power of

Motibhai Lalloobhai and Co. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and anr.

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : AIR1957All84

are discharged direct taxation retrospective effect section 7 of the finance act 1951 and article 31 2 of constitution of india 2 the amendments made in the central excise and salt act 1944 by sub section 1 shall be deemed to have that even if parliament had not the power to enact section 7 of the finance act 1951 under the power vested

Commissioner of Wealth-tax Vs. Smt. Brij Rani

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : (1992)108CTR(All)46; [1993]201ITR307(All)

was introduced with effect from april 1 1969 by the finance act 1969 accordingly he directed the wealth tax officer to provision contained in section 18 1 a i of the act for computation of penalty with reference to each succeeding month bom it has held that the quantum of penalty under section 18 1 a is to be determined as per the

Allahabad District Co-operative Bank Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ...

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : [1972]83ITR895(All)

a tax other than income tax section 2 of the finance act 1963 clearly indicates that the total amount computed in tax as contemplated by section 81 of the income tax act 1961 the petitioner is not exempt from paying it 12 the only effect of making a provision like that of section 81 of the act is that the income tax authorities