File Wrapper - Judgment Search Results

Kirin-amgen Inc and Others (Appellants) Vs. Hoechst Marion Roussel Lim ...

Court: House of Lords

..... courts have restricted the scope of the doctrine by what is called prosecution history or file wrapper estoppel by which equivalence cannot be claimed for integers restricting the monopoly which have been ..... upon the amendment from denying that he intended to surrender that part of the monopoly file wrapper estoppel means that the true scope of patent protection often cannot be established without an .....

Commissioner of Central Excise Vs. Surya Packaging

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Reported in: (2004)(170)ELT409Tri(Mum.)bai

..... department at the relevant time this finding would indicate that such wrappers etc were not cut to shape and size and therefore following ..... findings a g p s also mention that the cut wrappers vertical are cleared in rolls and not as individual containers and ..... respondents were absent heard the departmental representative in the appeal filed by the revenue and considered the materials 2 on perusal of the .....

R.K. Products Vs. Kothari Products Ltd.

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: 2004(3)AWC2809; [2005]126CompCas858(All); 2005(31)PTC393(All)

..... of the respondent writing the word kothari on similar size of wrappers colour scheme and logo with a view to cause infringement to ..... the above trade mark for which as per the affidavit filed on behalf of the plaintiff respondent the matter of registration of the ..... has been made the copy of the publication had been filed before the lower court the appellant defendant has not taken any such .....

C.K. Sunny Vs. Additional Sales Tax Officer-i, Sales Tax Office

Court: Kerala

Reported in: [2005]139STC186(Ker)

the copies of n forms and check post declarations who filed the same before the stcp authorities and rubber board therefore

Manoj Singh @ Manoj Kumar Singh and anr. Vs. State of Bihar (Now Jhark ...

Court: Jharkhand

Reported in: [2004(4)JCR53(Jhr)]

ramesh kumar merathia j 1 heard the parties this appeal is directed against the judgment dated 14 9 1999 passed...

Sri Sri Lakshmi Janardan Thakur and ors. Vs. Prabhat Kumar Paul and or ...

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: 2004(2)CHN270

sale of the suit property in connection with a suit filed by calcutta municipality in connection with a suit filed by

Sarwan Singh and ors. Vs. State of Punjab and anr.

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Reported in: 2004CriLJ4038

cancellation report and the complainant is having a light to file the protest report and to argue the matter thereafter the

United Engineers and anr. Vs. Nirmal Bhasin

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Reported in: (2005)139PLR731

lacunna thus the application is allowed since it has been filed at later stage so the applicant landlord is burdened with

Rajandheer (India) Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Delhi Development Authority

Court: Delhi

Reported in: AIR2004Delhi208; 109(2004)DLT442; 2004(72)DRJ601

husband a petition seeking protection of minor child was thereupon filed by father of the husband before delhi high court a

Soore Detergents, by Proprietor Vs. D. Mohanraj and anr.

Court: Karnataka

Reported in: ILR2004KAR4325

..... there was deception and not whether striking dissimilarity between the two wrappers produced before the court and wherefore the order passed by the ..... there was deception and not whether striking dissimilarity between the two wrappers produced before the court and wherefore the order passed by ..... aside the order of the trial court rejecting the i a filed under order 39 rule 1 amp 2 the court section 13 .....