File Wrapper - Judgment Search Results

Kimat Gram Udyog Samiti Vs. Rasan Detergents Pvt. Ltd

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Reported in: 2005(30)PTC293(P& H)

..... same since the year 1976 under the aforesaid wrapper the registration of the wrapper was valid and subsisting at the time when the suit was filed the goods of the respondent were stated ..... to be packed inter alia in the wrappers having a particular get up with its characteristic .....

Calcutta Chemicals Co. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex., Chennai

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: 2003(88)ECC229; 2003(154)ELT326(SC); (2005)10SCC573

..... have seen the wrappers of the product we have also seen the classification list filed by the appellants both the wrappers and the classification ..... words would not deprive a party from the benefit of notification wrappers and classification list show that the product is being sold ..... to these words it is pointed out that the appellants have filed an affidavit to this effect reliance is also placed upon .....

Colgate Pamolive (i) Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Reported in: (2004)(178)ELT391Tri(Mum.)bai

..... under rule 173 h and 173 l were filed and prescribed procedure followed however during the repacking reprocessing of the defective goods inputs fresh wrappers and stiffeners on which modvat credit was ..... of use of modvat inputs in repacking reprocessing was never disclosed reflected in the returns filed the present appeal is also silent on this aspect of the finding once there is .....

Headway Lithographic Co. Vs. Cce

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Calcutta

Reported in: (2003)(88)ECC17

..... ii cut them into sizes for use by many manufacturers as wrappers such wrappers being used for protecting the biris it has been held that ..... are being undertaken by the appellants from the written submissions on record filed on 18 7 2002 by the ld advocate for the appellants ..... 6 the reference is therefore answered in the above terms the file should be placed before the bench for decision of the appeal .....

National Soap Mills Vs. Amar Soap Factory Bassi and anr.

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Reported in: (2003)135PLR49

..... started using the trade mark raju soap identical to that registered wrapper of the petitioner having similar design get up and colour ..... saggar counsel for the petitioner and carefully gone through the file however nobody has put in appearance to address arguments on ..... then single suit relating to two different causes of action filed by plaintiff is maintainable in the present case the respondents .....

Raj Rubber Industries Vs. Cce

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu

Reported in: (2003)(88)ECC361

and are manufacturers of pre cured synthetic tread rubber they filed classification list 7 90 91 under sub heading 4016 99

Haji P. Mohammed Timber Merchant and ors. Vs. State of Kerala and ors.

Court: Kerala

Reported in: [2004]136STC335(Ker)

sales tax it is in these circumstances the petitioners have filed the above writ petitions the material facts and circumstances in

Commissioner of Central Excise Vs. Vikrant Tyres Ltd.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT

Reported in: (2003)(161)ELT674Tri(Bang.)

appeals i do not find any substance in the appeal filed by revenue in the result the appeal is dismissed

G. Md. Masoom Vs. S.K. Khader Vali and anr.

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: II(2004)ACC794; 2005ACJ1802; 2004(2)ALD324

2 f of the cantonment fund servants rules 1937 can file appeal under rules 13 14 and 15 to authorities provided

Cce Vs. Bikaner Engg. (Foundry)

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

1 revenue filed this appeal against the order in appeal passed by the