Fifteenth - Judgment Search Results

Nevada Dept. of Human Resources Vs. Hibbs

Court: US Supreme Court

..... 334 congress response was a limited remedial scheme designed to guarantee meaningful enforcement of the fifteenth amendment garrett supra at 373 this scheme was both congruent because it aimed at ..... well as judicial precedents supporting the basic congressional findings that the clear commands of the fifteenth amendment had been infringed by various state subterfuges given the existence of the evil .....

Sameer Engineering Works Vs. District Collector

Court: Gujarat

Reported in: (2003)3GLR2638

..... money shall be paid by the purchaser before sunset of the fifteenth day from that on which the sale of the immovable property ..... took place or if the said fifteenth day to be a sunday or other authorised holiday then before ..... sunset of the first office day after fifteenth day this section says that the purchaser shall have to make .....

Kuldeep Mattoo and anr. Vs. Hirday Nath Pandita

Court: Jammu and Kashmir

Reported in: 2003(3)JKJ255

..... the date of the order with a further direction to deposit the monthly rent by fifteenth day of the next following month since the defendants did not comply with the directions ..... date of the order or the rent at such rate for any month by the fifteenth day of the next following month the court shall order the defence against ejectment to .....

Brij Mohan Vs. Central Administrative Tribunal and ors.

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: 2003(3)AWC1977

..... was the said decision of the constitution bench which necessitated the parliament to bring the fifteenth amendment to the constitution by which clause ia was added to article 226 that clause ..... have accorded almost a uniform interpretation to the said compendious expression even prior to the fifteenth amendment of the constitution as to mean the bundle of facts which it would be .....

Rajendra Behl Vs. Commissioner, South Chotanagpur Division and ors.

Court: Jharkhand

Reported in: 2003(2)BLJR1577; [2003(3)JCR536(Jhr)]

..... deposit the rent at the rate determined by the controller month to month by the fifteenth day of the following month together with arrears if any during the pendency of the ..... be and to direct to go on depositing the rent month to month by the fifteenth day of the following month at the rate determined by the controller 3 if there .....

NasiruddIn and ors. Vs. Sita Ram Agarwal

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR2003SC1543; 2003(4)CTC284; JT2003(2)SC56; (2003)2MLJ35(SC); RLW2003(2)SC315; 2003(1)SCALE658; (2003)2SCC577; [2003]1SCR634; 2003(2)UJ781(SC); 2003(1)WLN707

..... monthly rent subsequent to the period up to which determination has been made by the fifteenth of each succeeding month or within such further time not exceeding fifteen days as may ..... date of the order or the rent at such rate for any month by the fifteenth day of the next following month the court shall order the defence against ejectment to .....

Kudiyala Ramana Vs. Vattikolla Somaraju and ors.

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 2003(2)ALD93; 2003(6)ALT730

..... payable shall be paid by the purchaser into court before the court closes on the fifteenth day from the sale of the property the learned counsel also contended mat in the ..... payable shall be paid by the purchaser into court before the court closes on the fifteenth day from the sale of the property provided that in calculating the amount to be .....

Ramaiah Vs. State of Karnataka by Secretary, Revenue Department and or ...

Court: Karnataka

Reported in: AIR2003Kant296; ILR2003KAR1385; 2004(2)KarLJ45

..... england and found that the same had acquired wide acceptability in england by the mid fifteenth century the court extracted with approval the observations made by lord denning m r in .....

NagIn Das M. Goradia Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai

Reported in: (2004)83TTJ(Mum.)151

..... evidence that is why in form 2b as applicable before its substitution by the it fifteenth amendment rules 2001 unlike in other returns the assessee is called upon to give details .....

Sstate Vs. Mohd. Afzal and ors.

Court: Delhi

Reported in: 2003VIIAD(Delhi)1; 107(2003)DLT385; 2003(71)DRJ178; 2003(3)JCC1669

..... thereby you committed an offence punishable under section 3 3 4 and 5 of pota fifteenth that you accused mohd afzal and shaukat hussain guru were found in possession of rs .....