Fifteenth - Judgment Search Results

Rice Vs. Cayetano

Court: US Supreme Court

..... claiming inter alia that the voting exclusion was invalid under the fourteenth and fifteenth amendments the federal district court granted the state summary judgment surveying the history ..... election provision invalid the aha election provision violates neither the fourteenth amendment nor the fifteenth that conclusion is in keeping with three overlapping principles first the federal government .....

Reno Vs. Bossier Parish School Bd.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... evidence regarding actual retrogressive effect although virtually identical language in 2 a and the fifteenth amendment has been read to refer not only to retrogression but to discrimination ..... s references to undervaluation and underrepresentation make clear the case involves application of standard fifteenth amendment principles to the annexation context not an annexation exception as long as the .....

Navinchandra N. Majithia Vs. State of Maharashtra and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR2000SC2966; 2000(2)ALD(Cri)675; 2000(5)ALT50(SC); 2000(4)CTC60; JT2000(10)SC61; 2000(II)OLR(SC)469; 2000(6)SCALE262; (2000)7SCC640; [2000]Supp3SCR82; 2000(2)LC1502(SC)

..... was the said decision of the constitution bench which necessitated the parliament to bring the fifteenth amendment to the constitution by which clause 1a was added to article 226 that clause ..... have accorded almost a uniform interpretation to the said compendious expression even prior to the fifteenth amendment of the constitution as to mean the bundle of facts which it would be .....

California Democratic Party Vs. Jones

Court: US Supreme Court

..... a special role to political parties the parties discriminatory action becomes state action under the fifteenth amendment this nation has a tradition of political associations in which citizens band together to ..... bring into the process so that the parties discriminatory action becomes state action under the fifteenth amendment allwright supra at 664 see also terry 345 u s at 484 clark j .....

M.P. All India Tourist Permit Owners Vs. State of M.P. and ors.

Court: Madhya Pradesh

Reported in: 2001(5)MPHT15

..... sub section 7 of section 16 7 the government of madhya pradesh has appointed the fifteenth february 2000 as the date on which the aforesaid act came into force in exercise .....

Patel Roadways Limited Vs. Birla Yamaha Limited

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: 2000(3)CTC59; JT2000(3)SC618; (2000)125PLR816; 2000(2)SCALE559; (2000)4SCC91; [2000]2SCR665; 2000(2)LC887(SC)

..... which the carrier may choose to enter with the customer 23 in sarkar on evidence fifteenth edition 1999 at page 1724 under the heading negligence it is stated as a rule .....

People Union for Civil Liberties Vs. State of U.P. and Others

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: 2001(1)AWC1; (2001)1UPLBEC3

..... within those territories is the correct one 11 clause 1a was thereafter inserted by the fifteenth amendment act 1963 and it has been renumbered as clause 2 by the constitution forty .....

Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd. Vs. Durga Prasad Sharma

Court: Rajasthan

Reported in: 2001(4)WLC308; 2007(2)WLN156

..... the monthly rent subsequent to the period upto which determination has been made by the fifteenth of each succeeding month or within such further time not exceeding fifteen days as may .....

Thankam and Another Vs. Sreekumar and Twenty Four Others

Court: Chennai

Reported in: (2001)1MLJ156

..... nair learned counsel for the contesting respondents referred to the commentary by sarkar on evidence fifteenth edition 1999 pg 857 wherein it is stated as follows the most natural course for .....

Balram Singh Vs. State of M.P.

Court: Madhya Pradesh

Reported in: 2000(4)MPHT39

..... considered to be sexually potent at the age of puberty which usually occurs at the fifteenth or sixteenth year sexual intercourse is however possible at about the thirteenth or fourteenth year .....