Fed - Judgment Search Results

Franconia Associates Vs. United States

Court: US Supreme Court

..... reasons it had dismissed the claims of the franconia petitioners 46 fed cl 629 633 635 2000 the federal circuit affirmed without opinion ..... into the future id at 1362 emphasis added see also 43 fed cl at 710 the federal circuit we are persuaded incorrectly characterized ..... services pty ltd v united states 133 f 3d 874 ca fed 1998 in line with our recognition that limitations principles should generally .....

United States Vs. Vonn

Court: US Supreme Court

..... showing among other things that plain error did affect his substantial rights fed rule crim proc 52 b rule l1 h of the federal rules ..... motions filed after sentencing advisory committee s notes on 1983 amendment to fed rule crim proc 32 18 u s c app p 1621 quoting ..... required automatic reversal see advisory committee s notes on 1983 amendments to fed rule crim proc 11 18 u s c app p 1568 hereinafter .....

WisconsIn Dept. of Health and Family Servs. Vs. Blumer

Court: US Supreme Court

..... considered unavailable to the institutionalized spouse when determining his or her eligibility for medicaid 66 fed reg 46763 46768 2001 we adhere to this common understanding of the csra throughout this ..... determining whether the community spouse has sufficient income to meet minimum monthly maintenance needs 66 fed reg 46763 46765 2001 the proposed rule details the secretary s reasons for concluding .....

Harendra Singh Vs. Joint Director of Education and ors.

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: 2003(1)AWC361

..... dsinksa ij rnfkz fu qfdr inksuufr ij izfrcu kegksn izns k dslgk rk izkir ek fed fo ky ksa lalfkk iz kku iz kkukpk zds fjdr gksus okys inksa ij ..... mrrj izns k ek fed f k kk lsok pu cksmz bykgkckn kjk p u dh dk zokgh izkfkfedrk ..... lec fopkjksijkur jh jkt iky egksn izns kds v kkldh lgk rk izkir ek fed fo ky ksa esa fnukd 30 6 2002 dh lsok fuo frrij vu fdlh .....

DevlIn Vs. Scardelletti

Court: US Supreme Court

..... of the requirement that a settlement be fair to all class members fed rule civ proc 23 e what is at issue instead is whether ..... been consistently allowed to do under the federal rules of civil procedure see fed rule civ proc 23 e a class action shall not be dismissed ..... to avoid the fourth by consolidating cases rais 14 ing duplicative appeals fed rule app proc 3 b 2 if the resolution of any of .....

Sprietsma Vs. Mercury Marine

Court: US Supreme Court

..... all then existing state laws from preemption under the act 36 fed reg 15764 15765 he explained that boating safety would not ..... regulations that concerned requirements covered by the 1972 regulations see 38 fed reg 6914 6915 1973 existing state laws that regulated matters ..... guard or all of several propeller injury avoidance measures 66 fed reg at 63647 63 essarily contains the best evidence of .....

Swierkiewicz Vs. Sorema N. A.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... statement of the claim showing that the pleader is entitled to relief fed rule civ proc 8 a 2 the mcdonnell douglas framework which ..... sufficient to survive respondent s motion to dismiss pp 510 515 5 fed appx 63 reversed and remanded thomas j delivered the opinion for ..... to indicate the simplicity and brevity of statement which the rules contemplate fed rule civ proc 84 for example form 9 sets forth a .....

Department of Housing and Urban Development Vs. Rucker

Court: US Supreme Court

..... could not control behavior by other occupants of the unit 56 fed reg 51560 51567 1991 after aha initiated the eviction proceedings ..... of tenant responsibility under normal landlord tenant law and practice 56 fed reg at 51567 strict liability maximizes deterrence and eases enforcement ..... is a threat to other residents and the project 56 fed reg at 51567 with drugs leading to murders muggings and .....

Ragsdale Vs. Wolverine World Wide, Inc.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... employees are aware of their rights when they take leave see 60 fed reg 2220 1995 we need not decide today whether this conclusion accords ..... not permit to be designated as fmla leave see e g 60 fed reg 2230 1995 leave granted under circumstances that do not meet ..... be aware of their rights and responsibilities under the act see 60 fed reg 2220 1995 the intent of this notice requirement is to insure .....

Holmes Group, Inc. Vs. Vornado Air Circulation Systems, Inc.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... when referred to by 1295 a i pp 832 834 13 fed appx 961 vacated and remanded scalia j delivered the opinion of ..... its jurisdiction the federal circuit vacated the district court s judgment 13 fed appx 961 2001 and remanded for consideration of whether the change ..... v machine tool works oerlikon buehrle ltd 895 f 2d 736 ca fed 1990 simply address whether a district court can retain jurisdiction over .....