Fed - Judgment Search Results

Libretti Vs. United States

Court: US Supreme Court

..... including but not limited to various assets specified in the indictment see fed rule crim proc 7 c 2 no judgment of forfeiture may be ..... a defendant will have been provided a copy of the indictment see fed rule crim proc 10 the defendant shall be given a copy of ..... shall allege the extent of the interest or property subject to forfeiture fed rule crim proc l1 c l court must address defendant personally in .....

Stone Vs. Ins

Court: US Supreme Court

..... of district court judgments subject to post trial motions is concerned see fed rule app proc 4 a 4 specifying that the majority of post ..... namely those filed soon after entry of the district court judgment see fed rule app proc 4 a 4 the relevant statute commonly called the ..... rules in order to understand what they are supposed to do see fed rule app proc 4 a and rules of civil procedure cited therein .....

United States Vs. Mezzanatto

Court: US Supreme Court

..... inconsistent with the rules goal of encouraging voluntary settlement see advisory committee s notes on fed rule evid 410 purpose of rule is promotion of disposition of criminal cases by compromise ..... to admissibility equally uncompromising on their face but nonetheless waivable beyond any question see fed rule evid 802 hearsay fed rule evid 1002 best evidence the majority comes down on the side of .....

Babbitt Vs. Sweet Home Chapter, Communities for Great Ore.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... species conservation act of 1969 83 stat 275 5 see 55 fed reg 26114 1990 another regulation promulgated by the secretary extends ..... to eat mamane naio seedlings that when full grown might have fed and sheltered endangered palila was wrongly decided according to the ..... physical injury to an individual member of the wildlife species 46 fed reg 54748 1981 the concurrence denies that this means that .....

Tome Vs. United States

Court: US Supreme Court

..... or prior identification testimony or admissions by a party opponent see fed rule evid 80l the rules do not accord this weighty ..... general proscription of hearsay testimony absent a specific 164 exception see fed rule evid 802 let alone the traditional analysis of hearsay that ..... or less probable than it would be without the evidence fed rules evid 401 402 the judge may reject the evidence assuming .....

Kyles Vs. Whitley

Court: US Supreme Court

..... testimony that kyles s family kept a dog and cat and often fed stray animals in the neighborhood finally kyles again took the stand denying ..... several defense witnesses that kyles owned a dog and that his children fed stray cats the brands of pet food found were only two ..... the district court s finding controls because it is not clearly erroneous fed rule civ proc 52 a and the state court s finding .....

Sudhakara Maller Vs. the Directorate of Medical Education and 2 ors.

Court: Chennai

Reported in: 1996(1)CTC160

..... i e code nos 58 and 59 and they ought to have fed the first and second choices in the computer but by mistake the ..... third and fourth choices were fed into the computer due to the said error the third respondent was ..... first two choices given by the third respondent in the computer and wrongly fed the last two choices he could not have appropriated the only seat .....

Dominion Chemical Industries Vs. Collector of C. Ex.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in: (1995)(78)ELT320TriDel

..... upto the marketing stage to improve feed efficiency flavomycin is fed to poultry to increase body weight in broilers and increase ..... chicks contracting coccidiosis and bacterial infection stenorol and flavomycin cannot be fed to poultry he submits that though these products strengthen the ..... we find that flavomycin 40 is a chemical which is fed as a sole ration in the feed and it facilitates .....

Seminole Tribe of FlA. Vs. Florida

Court: US Supreme Court

..... claims such as the judicially fashioned remedy in bivens v six unknown fed narcotics agents 403 10 in his dissent in pennsylvania v union ..... a duty to negotiate that federal statutory law alone imposes neither the fed 93 eralist papers nor hans provides support for the view that such ..... create a further remedy on the model of bivens v six unknown fed narcotics agents 403 u s 388 1971 for such harms as .....

United States Vs. Gaudin

Court: US Supreme Court

..... at 520 521 preliminary questions in a trial regarding the admissibility of evidence fed rule evid 104 a the competency of witnesses ibid the voluntariness 526 of confessions ..... u s 683 688 689 1986 the legality of searches and seizures fed rule crim proc 12 b 3 and the propriety of venue see ..... fed rule crim proc 18 may be decided by the trial court finally .....