Favier Explosive - Judgment Search Results

Ashrafkhan Alias Babu Munnekhan Pathan and ors. Vs. State of Gujarat a ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

it were found according to the allegation the arms and explosives seized were similar to those used in the ahmedabad city

Naga People's Movement of Human Rights Vs. Union of India (UOi)

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1998SC465; 1998(1)ALD(Cri)220; JT1997(9)SC431; 1997(7)SCALE741; (1998)2SCC109; [1997]Supp5SCR469

being used as weapons or of fire arms ammunition or explosive substances has to be passed under the arms act 1959

In Re: B.K. Rajagopal and ors.

Court: Chennai

Reported in: (1943)2MLJ634

found guilty of an offence under section 5 of the explosive substances act and ordered to undergo three years rigorous imprisonment

Manoga Ganjhu Vs. State of Jharkhand

Court: Jharkhand

3 of explosive substance act but nothing incriminating relating to explosive substance was either seized or produced before the trial court

Pran Yadav and ors. Vs. the State of Jharkhand

Court: Jharkhand

Reported in: 2007CriLJ1059; [2007(2)JCR13(Jhr)]

his conviction for the offence under section 4 of the explosive substance act is affirmed 11 from the record it appears

Sanjay Dutt Vs. State Through C.B.i., Bombay

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: JT1994(5)SC225a; 1994(3)SCALE790; (1994)5SCC402; [1994]Supp2SCR729; 1994(2)LC474(SC)

of the arms rules 1962 or bombs dynamite or other explosive substances in a notified area is sufficient by itself to

Kajaji Ramji Vs. the State of Gujarat

Court: Gujarat

Reported in: 1966CriLJ331

a person armed with any offensive weapon or with any explosive or corrosive substance in any street or public place and

Md. Masood Akhtar and Etc. Etc. Vs. State of Bihar

Court: Patna

according to him aforesaid injury no i was caused by explosives and injury no ii was caused by firearm and the

Ahmed BIn Salam Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1999SC1617; 1999(1)ALD(Cri)780; 1999CriLJ2281; 1999(2)Crimes354(SC); JT1999(3)SC107; RLW1999(3)SC400; 1999(2)SCALE565; (1999)4SCC111; [1999]2SCR610

establish the charges under sections 3 and 5 of the explosive substances act and accordingly set aside the conviction and sentences

Yakub Abdul Razak Memon Vs. State of Maharashtra Th:cbi Mumbai

Court: Supreme Court of India

and undergo weapons training in handling of arms ammunitions and explosives to commit terrorist acts to harbour and conceal terrorists co