Skip to content


Fair Explosive - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: fair explosive Page 1 of about 619 results (0.057 seconds)
Feb 26 1981 (HC)

Gamdoor Singh Vs. State of Punjab

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Reported in: 1981CriLJ1912

..... was found to be in possession of not only explosive substances but fairly expensive weapons of foreign origin the 38 revolver was ..... the appellant and the report of the deputy controller of explosives neither the statements of the witnesses were challenged in cross ..... grenades recovered from the possession of the petitioner would be explosive substances within the meaning of the definition despite the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 16 1982 (SC)

Sheonandan Paswan Vs. State of Bihar and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1983SC1125; AIR1983SC194; 1983(0)BLJR645; 1983CriLJ348; 1984(1)Crimes147(SC); 1982(2)SCALE1241; 1983(2)SCALE126; (1983)1SCC438; (1983)4SCC104; [1983]2SCR61

..... and 12 of the indian explosives act 1884 as well as the substantive offences learned counsel fairly concedes that he does not ..... of rs 55 crores to pakistan and was followed by explosive situation involving emotive issue resulting in widespread violence arson and ..... dispute or industrial conflict or student unrest or the like explosive situation involving any emotive issue giving rise to any surcharged .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 06 2009 (SC)

Perla Somasekhara Reddy and ors. Vs. State of A.P. Rep. by Public Pros ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: JT2009(8)SC105; 2009(7)SCALE115; 2009AIRSCW6059

..... over the body and the car was also badly damaged due to explosion of bombs a 5 sustained splinter injuries and fell down unconscious a ..... 149 435 435 149 ipc and section 3 5 and 6 of explosive act all the accused denied the charges and claimed for trial ..... a merely possible doubt but fair doubt based upon reason and common sense indian penal code 1890 sections 300 149 explosive substances act 6 of 1908 .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 12 2005 (SC)

Prakash Kumar @ Prakash Bhutto Vs. State of Gujarat

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: 2005(1)ALD(Cri)594; 2005CriLJ929; JT2005(11)SC209; (2005)2SCC409; 2005(1)LC446(SC)

..... is in strict conformity with the well recognised and accepted aesthetic principles and fundamental fairness in planting of explosive devices in trains buses and public places the object to terrorise to create ..... which several innocent lives have been lost and many suffered serious injuries in planting of explosive devices in trains buses and public places the object to terrorise to create fear and .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Oct 14 1987 (SC)

Kamlabai and ors. Vs. Mangilal Dulichand Mantri

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1988SC375; JT1987(4)SC82; 1987MhLJ1102(SC); 1987(2)SCALE755; (1987)4SCC585; [1988]1SCR464

..... imaginary trivial or a merely possible doubt but fair doubt based upon reason and common sense indian penal code 1890 sections 300 149 explosive substances act 6 of 1908 sections 3 5 ..... the order passed by the rent controller filing this compromise appears to be just and fair it appears that the rent controller took the view that as the tenant himself has .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 11 1992 (SC)

M.G. Metal Industries and ors. Vs. Government of India

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: 1993Supp(4)SCC82

..... imaginary trivial or a merely possible doubt but fair doubt based upon reason and common sense indian penal code 1890 sections 300 149 explosive substances act 6 of 1908 sections 3 5 .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 11 1994 (SC)

Kartar Singh Vs. State of Punjab.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: 1994SCC(3)569; JT1994(2)423

..... liberal procedure for transfer of cases so that a fair and just trial is held in an uncharged ..... disturbed area it is imperative that fair trial within that area would not normally be feasible and that therefore the legislature having regard to such prevailing explosive situation has provided for a .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Oct 07 2013 (HC)

Chennai Fire Works Dealers Welfare Association Vs. Tamil Nadu Tourism ...

Court: Chennai

..... are arranged in a row as per the guidelines of the explosives department the amusement park garment stores and food fair is located on the main island grounds away from the cracker ..... coovum river the gap between the cracker shops and the fair area is about 70 m rule no 84 of the explosives rules requires that the temporary shops should be at least .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Feb 17 1899 (PC)

Kally Dass Mookerjee Vs. the East Indian Railway Company

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: (1899)ILR26Cal465

..... no neglect of reasonable precautions on their side and that the explosives were really carried in a manner that avoided detection these ..... one may i think consider that his future career was fairly assured he appears to have lived at rawalpindi in the ..... plaintiff to establish by evidence circumstances from which it may be fairly inferred that there is reasonable probability that the accident resulted .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 14 2014 (HC)

Santoshanand Avdoot @ Ghanshyam Prashad and anr. Vs. State

Court: Delhi

..... 3 in addition were charged for committing offence under section 307 ipc and 4 b explosive substances act the appellants abjured their guilt and claimed trial the prosecution examined 85 witnesses ..... a 3 under section 4 b of the explosive substances act was not acceptable counsel further emphasised that investigation and trial were not fair transparent and legal cbi started investigation on 30 .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.

Sign-up to get more results

Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.

Start Free Trial

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //