Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: faridabad development corporation act 1956 section 1 short title Court: rajasthan Page 4 of about 526 results (0.076 seconds)

Jul 27 1987 (HC)

New Kabristan Committee Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : 1987WLN(UC)462

..... specially mentioned that the collector shall not set-apart land for any public or municipal purpose (other than for free pasturage of cattle, for forest reserve, or for development of abadi) without obtaining previous approval of the state government. in the present case because no previous sanction of the state government was obtained, therefore, the order ..... has challenged the order dated september 3, 1986 mainly on the ground that the land had been once set apart by the collector under section 92 of the act, acting on the aforesaid allotment the member of the petitioner committee had invested about rs. 10,00,000/- and the land had been put to the use for ..... land could be allotted to the petitioner committee for kabristan, the petitioner committee invested substantial sum in raising boundary wall, well and masjid etc. thus the petitioner acted to its detriment on the assurance given by the collector, not only the assurance but in the order of the collector, the land had been set-apart .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 28 1977 (HC)

Ram Rakh Vyas Vs. the Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : AIR1977Raj243; 1977()WLN16

..... powers and duties of the president under the constitution but also the exercise and performance of the powers and duties conferred on the president qua president by any act or the rules made thereunder. the writ petition filed by the appellant against the president of india, is therefore, not maintainable.40. the writ petition was ..... s case (supra) pandey, j. while interpreting an identical expression appearing in two presidential orders dated 28-11-1968 issued under section 51 (2) of the act, creating permanent benches of the high court of madhya pradesh at indore and gwalior, observed:'the expression 'in respect of cases arising in the revenue districts of' ..... not properly constituted and therefore the bench ceased to have jurisdiction. in repelling the objection, chatterji j. adverted to section 220 of the government of india act, 1935, which was in pari materia with article 223, and observed:'thus the contingency of the office of chief justice remaining vacant for some time is expressly .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 27 1956 (HC)

Brij Sunder Sharma Vs. Election Tribunal, Jaipur and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : AIR1957Raj189

..... no mistake about his identity would not rectify the defect and validate the nomination paper . 26. in baldwin's case (b) nomination paper was filed under the municipal corporations act, 1882, for election as rural district councillors and the omission was not with respect to the serial number. we do not think that it is of much assistance in ..... of rule 4 of that order, and therefore was not cured by rule 33. in the cose of queen v. tugwell (c) by section 32 of the municipal corporation act the voting paper was required to contain the christian names and surnames of the persons for whom the burgess votes, with their places of abode and description. by section ..... 142 no inaccurate description of any person, body corporate, or place, named.....in any roll list, notice, or voting paper required by the act was to hinder the full operation of the act in respect to such persons etc. provided that the description of such person, etc., be such as .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 10 2004 (HC)

The Coordinator of All India Engineering/Pharmacy/Architects Entrance ...

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : RLW2005(3)Raj1700; 2005(1)WLC387

..... by the decisions of the supreme court in hans muller of nurenburg v. superintendent, presidency jail, calcutta and ors., air 1955 sc 367, state trading corporation of india ltd. v. commercial taxes officer and ors., air 1963 sc 1811, british india steam navigation co. ltd. v. jasjit singh and ors ..... in undergraduate programmes leading to professional qualifications in the country, presented its report to the department of secondary and higher education, ministry of human resource development. the committee was of the opinion that the central and deemed universities should participate in common entrance examination, 2003.19. it appears that bits, ..... governed by the existing regulations of aicte;(b) institutions deemed to be universities under section 3 of the act including such institutions which operate on self-financing basis without receiving maintenance or development grants from the central government, any state government or any statutory body under their control and disbursing grants;( .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 10 1993 (HC)

State Bank of India Vs. Spintex Tubes and Constructions Ltd. and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : [1995]82CompCas290(Raj); 1993(2)WLC236

..... 5, 1992, under section 446 read with section 456 of the companies act, 1956, and rules 6 and 9 of the companies (court) rules, 1959, read with section 151 of the civil procedure code, has been filed by the rajasthan state industrial development and investment corporation ltd. (riico), in which it has been prayed that leave be ..... the respondent-company, which is authorised under law to recover its dues in the manner provided under section 29/30 of the state financial corporations act, 1951 (hereinafter referred to as 'the act, 1951'). it is also provided under section 46b that it shall have overriding effect over other laws, which may be inconsistent therewith. the ..... therefore, it has tried to overreach the court by taking over possession, has no force, because riico is entitled to act under the provisions of the state financial corporations act, 1951 (for brevity, 'the act, 1951'). it may be pointed out that riico does not oppose the winding-up proceedings even now and has merely made .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 27 2001 (HC)

J.K. Udaipur Udyog Ltd. Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : [2003]131STC88(Raj); 2002(2)WLC106; 2001(3)WLN112

..... for its revival. in maharashtra tubes ltd. v. state industrial & investment corporation of maharashtra and anr. (34), the hon'ble apex court considered the scope of application of two special acts, i.e. sick industrial companies (special provisions) act, 1985 and state financial corporation act, 1951, as in the said case the financial institution had claimed over ..... quashing of the notification has been sought in this petition. sales tax is imposed in public interest so that the state may meet its obligation of development of the state and it is for this reason that the sovereign dues can be recovered on preferential basis. the sales tax may impose certain ..... petitioner or any other industrial unit and whenever public interest requires, the scheme may be modified/amended. needless to say that whenever revenues are required for development of the state and the government takes a decision to modify such a scheme, the industrial units cannot have any grievance against it. clause (g) .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 13 2006 (HC)

Associated Cement Co. Ltd. (the) and anr. Vs. State of Rajasthan and a ...

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : RLW2006(2)Raj1359; 2006(2)WLC142

..... lease was renewed as per model form k of mining lease provided under rule 31 of the mineral concession rules, 1960 made under mines & minerals regulation and development act, 1957 pursuant to the declaration made by the central government under list 1 schedule 7 of the constitution of india.7. the controversy arise when in the month ..... question of alternative remedy as the writ petition is pending for last twenty years. in support of his submissions, he placed reliance on the judgment rendered in case of whirlpool corporation. v. registrar of trade marks reported in : air1999sc22 , harbanslal sahnia v. indian oil reported in : air2003sc2120 , kanak v. u.p. avas vikas parishad reported in : ..... and come up for final hearing after lapse of more than 20 years. looking to this fact and the ratio decided by hon'ble supreme court in case of whirlpool corporation. v. registrar of trade marks, harbanslal sahnia v. indian oil, kanak v. u.p. avas vikas parishad, dr. bal krishna agarwal v. state of u. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 24 1980 (HC)

Motiyan and Etc. Etc. Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : AIR1981Raj284

..... was needed or likely to be needed for public purpose i.e. for rajasthan state industrial & mineral development corporation. it is submitted that the rajasthan state industrial & mineral development corporation is a company incorporated under the companies act, 1956. that an agreement was made on 14th march, 1974 between the governor of state of ..... rajasthan hereinafter called the government on the one part and m/s. rajasthan state industrial & mineral development corporation on the other part, which is a company within the meaning of section 617 of the companies act, having one of its objects as promotion of industries in the state of rajasthan. whereas the ..... company is a government company within the meaning of section 6(17) of the companies act, 1956 as mentioned above. the copy of the agreement which was executed between the government and rajasthan state industrial & mineral development corporation is produced and marked as annexure r. 3. from the aforesaid government agreement it is .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 30 2002 (HC)

Guljag Industries Limited Vs. State of Rajasthan and anr.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : [2003]129STC3(Raj)

..... division bench but the same was declined. this fact is noted in the order dated september 22, 2000. in view of the post judgment development, the amendment was granted whereby a prayer has been made to quash the order of the assessing authority dated september 19, 2000.33. consequently, ..... officer : [1961]41itr191(sc) , raja anand brahma shah v. state of uttar pradesh : [1967]1scr373 , vatticherukuru village panchayat v. nori venkatarama deekshithulu : [1991]2scr531 , whirlpool corporation v. registrar of trade marks : air1999sc22 , rohtas industries ltd. v. s.d. agarwal : [1969]3scr108 and barium chemicals ltd. v. company law board : [1967]1scr898 , ..... the constitutional validity of any statute is under challenge ; (v) the vindication of public right ; (vi) prevention of injury to public at large ; (vii) the act is arbitrary or without sanction of law, reference be made to tata engineering and locomotive company ltd. v. assistant commissioner of commercial taxes : [1967]2scr751 ; and (viii .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 25 1980 (HC)

The Urban Improvement Trust, Jaipur Vs. Padmanand and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : AIR1980Raj176

..... created in one of the two ways, it may either be established by a statute or may be incorporated under a law such as the companies act, 1956 or the societies registration act, 1860. where a corporation is wholly controlled by the government, not only in its policy making but also in carrying out its functions, then there can be no doubt ..... amply clear that the functions, which the improvement trust is required to discharge, are public functions and a duty has been cast upon the trust to see that the development of urban area is properly regulated and is in conformity with the master plan approved by the state government. it is also apparent from a perusal of the aforesaid provisions ..... respect thereof shall also be charged by the municipal board or the council. thus, the trust is only a recommendatory body and its duty is to see that the development of the area is in conformity with the schemes in force and does not run counter to the master plan of the area.15. all these provisions make it, .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //