Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: faridabad development corporation act 1956 section 1 short title Court: delhi Page 6 of about 7,439 results (0.133 seconds)

Raj Singh vs.govt of Nct of Delhi and Ors.

Court : Delhi

..... to be decided in appropriate proceedings. counsel submits further that an identical issue had arisen before another division bench of this court in the case of sanjeev solanki vs. delhi development authority and ors, w.p. (c) 1999/2015, decided on 24.01.2017. counsel submits that a similar view has also been expressed by this court in ..... would be fully covered with the decision rendered by the apex court in the case of pune municipal corporation & anr. (supra), more particularly, paragraphs 14 to 20 of the judgment, which read as under: 14. section 31(1) of the 1894 act enjoins upon the collector, on making an award under section 11, to tender payment of compensation to ..... of his submissions, he relies on paragraph 6 of the counter affidavit, which reads as under: 6. that it is submitted that for the purposes of planned development of delhi, the answering respondent issued a notification u/s 4 of the land acquisition act, 1894 on 23.6.1989 which was followed by notification u/s 6 of the said .....

Tata Engineering and Locomotive Company Ltd. Vs. Municipal Corporation ...

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 2004IAD(Delhi)507; AIR2004Delhi191; 108(2003)DLT217

..... building is includible for the purpose of arriving at the rateable value of the building? and whether section 116(3) of the delhi municipal corporation act, 1957 (hereinafter referred to as 'the dmc act') vests arbitrary and uncanalised discretion in commissioner and is, thereforee, invalid for excessive delegation of legislative powers?' 6. after considering the legal ..... considered view, this could not have been the mode of calculation of the land rate in question. firstly, jhilmil colony is a residential colony which is developed which is not so in respect of the present land. secondly, the plots in question are small plots and not a large track of 5 acres ..... expenditure upon (a) goodwill, (b) land, (c) buildings, (d) leaseholds, (e) railway sidings, (f) plant and machinery, (g) furniture and fittings, (h) development of property etc.' the fourth column of the form which gives the instructions in accordance with which assets should be made out shows under each head 'the original cost and .....

Parshotam Joshi vs.govt of Nct of Delhi and Ors

Court : Delhi

..... compensation in its favour. for the sake of proper appreciation of the facts, the gaon sabha was impleaded as a party i.e. the fifth respondent. the block development officer representing the gaon sabha has filed an affidavit. the affidavit does not disclose the date of vesting of the land after it is assumed to be on the ..... , would be decided in the appropriate court of jurisdiction. he relies upon a judgment passed by another division bench of this court in the case of sanjeev solanki v. delhi development authority & ors. w.p.(c) 1999/2015 dated 24th january, 2017, in paras 5 and 6, has observed as under: 5. while we have declared that the ..... are of the considered view that the necessary ingredients for the application of section 24(2) of the new act as has been interpreted by the supreme court of india and this court in the following cases stand satisfied: (1) pune municipal corporation & anr. v. harakchand misirimal solanki & ors., reported at 2014 3 scc183 (2) union of india and ors .....

Tejpal vs.govt of Nct of Delhi and Ors

Court : Delhi

..... compensation in its favour. for the sake of proper appreciation of the facts, the gaon sabha was impleaded as a party i.e. the fifth respondent. the block development officer representing the gaon sabha has filed an affidavit. the affidavit does not disclose the date of vesting of the land after it is assumed to be on the ..... , would be decided in the appropriate court of jurisdiction. he relies upon a judgment passed by another division bench of this court in the case of sanjeev solanki v. delhi development authority & ors. w.p.(c) 1999/2015 dated 24th january, 2017, in paras 5 and 6, has observed as under: 5. while we have declared that the ..... are of the considered view that the necessary ingredients for the application of section 24(2) of the new act as has been interpreted by the supreme court of india and this court in the following cases stand satisfied: (1) pune municipal corporation & anr. v. harakchand misirimal solanki & ors., reported at 2014 3 scc183 (2) union of india and ors .....

Harish Chander vs.union of India Through: Lac (Shahdara) & Anr.

Court : Delhi

..... possession of the acquired land partially i.e., khasra no.61(2-15) of village gokulpur, illaqa sahahdara, delhi has been handed over to the respondent-delhi development authority by the lac/land and building department, govt. of nct of delhi on 29.07.1972 and the same acquired land transferred to horticulture department for green ..... that the acquired land, i.e., khasra no.614 (2-08) of village gokulpur, illaqa sahahdara, delhi has not been handed over to the respondent delhi development authority by the lac/land and building department, govt. of nct of delhi copy of possession proceedings dated 29.07.1972 is annexed herewith marked as annexure a- ..... are of the considered view that the necessary ingredients for the application of section 24(2) of the new act as has been interpreted by the supreme court of india and this court in the following cases stand satisfied: (1) pune municipal corporation & anr. v. harakchand misirimal solanki & ors., reported at 2014 3 scc183 (2) union of india .....

Kamlesh vs.govt of Nct of Delhi and Ors

Court : Delhi

..... 5. we may note that during the course of hearing of these writ petitions it had transpired that a flyover has been constructed by the delhi tourism and transportation development corporation (dttdc). resultantly, dttdc was impleaded as a party. on 09.01.2018, ms.shobhna takiar, advocate appeared and sought time to take instructions in the matter. ..... to have been lying unpaid as per report in naksha muntazamin. 9. in the case of pune municipal corporation & anr. (supra) in paras 14 to 20 it has been held as under: 14. section 31(1) of the 1894 act enjoins upon the collector, on making an award under section 11, to tender payment of compensation to persons ..... that the award pertaining to the subject land has been made by the special land acquisition officer more than five years prior to the commencement of the 2013 act. it is also admitted position that compensation so awarded has neither been paid to the landowners/persons interested nor deposited in the court. the deposit of compensation .....

Jitender vs.govt of Nct of Delhi and Ors

Court : Delhi

..... 5. we may note that during the course of hearing of these writ petitions it had transpired that a flyover has been constructed by the delhi tourism and transportation development corporation (dttdc). resultantly, dttdc was impleaded as a party. on 09.01.2018, ms.shobhna takiar, advocate appeared and sought time to take instructions in the matter. ..... to have been lying unpaid as per report in naksha muntazamin. 9. in the case of pune municipal corporation & anr. (supra) in paras 14 to 20 it has been held as under: 14. section 31(1) of the 1894 act enjoins upon the collector, on making an award under section 11, to tender payment of compensation to persons ..... that the award pertaining to the subject land has been made by the special land acquisition officer more than five years prior to the commencement of the 2013 act. it is also admitted position that compensation so awarded has neither been paid to the landowners/persons interested nor deposited in the court. the deposit of compensation .....

Chaman Singh vs.govt of Nct of Delhi & Ors

Court : Delhi

..... 5. we may note that during the course of hearing of these writ petitions it had transpired that a flyover has been constructed by the delhi tourism and transportation development corporation (dttdc). resultantly, dttdc was impleaded as a party. on 09.01.2018, ms.shobhna takiar, advocate appeared and sought time to take instructions in the matter. ..... to have been lying unpaid as per report in naksha muntazamin. 9. in the case of pune municipal corporation & anr. (supra) in paras 14 to 20 it has been held as under: 14. section 31(1) of the 1894 act enjoins upon the collector, on making an award under section 11, to tender payment of compensation to persons ..... that the award pertaining to the subject land has been made by the special land acquisition officer more than five years prior to the commencement of the 2013 act. it is also admitted position that compensation so awarded has neither been paid to the landowners/persons interested nor deposited in the court. the deposit of compensation .....

Charan Singh vs.govt of Nct of Delhi & Ors.

Court : Delhi

..... 5. we may note that during the course of hearing of these writ petitions it had transpired that a flyover has been constructed by the delhi tourism and transportation development corporation (dttdc). resultantly, dttdc was impleaded as a party. on 09.01.2018, ms.shobhna takiar, advocate appeared and sought time to take instructions in the matter. ..... to have been lying unpaid as per report in naksha muntazamin. 9. in the case of pune municipal corporation & anr. (supra) in paras 14 to 20 it has been held as under: 14. section 31(1) of the 1894 act enjoins upon the collector, on making an award under section 11, to tender payment of compensation to persons ..... that the award pertaining to the subject land has been made by the special land acquisition officer more than five years prior to the commencement of the 2013 act. it is also admitted position that compensation so awarded has neither been paid to the landowners/persons interested nor deposited in the court. the deposit of compensation .....

Satbir vs.govt of Nct of Delhi and Ors.

Court : Delhi

..... 5. we may note that during the course of hearing of these writ petitions it had transpired that a flyover has been constructed by the delhi tourism and transportation development corporation (dttdc). resultantly, dttdc was impleaded as a party. on 09.01.2018, ms.shobhna takiar, advocate appeared and sought time to take instructions in the matter. ..... to have been lying unpaid as per report in naksha muntazamin. 9. in the case of pune municipal corporation & anr. (supra) in paras 14 to 20 it has been held as under: 14. section 31(1) of the 1894 act enjoins upon the collector, on making an award under section 11, to tender payment of compensation to persons ..... that the award pertaining to the subject land has been made by the special land acquisition officer more than five years prior to the commencement of the 2013 act. it is also admitted position that compensation so awarded has neither been paid to the landowners/persons interested nor deposited in the court. the deposit of compensation .....