Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: faridabad development corporation act 1956 section 1 short title Court: delhi Page 4 of about 7,439 results (0.320 seconds)

Nov 27 2017 (HC)

Lile Ram vs.govt of Nct of Delhi & Ors.

Court : Delhi

..... of the petitioner is fully covered by the decision rendered by the supreme court of india in the case of pune municipal corporation & anr.(supra). paras 14 to 20 read as under: 14. section 31(1) of the 1894 act enjoins upon the collector, on making an award under section 11, to tender payment of compensation to persons interested entitled thereto ..... for disposal of the present writ petition are that a section 4 notification of the land acquisition act, 1894(hereinafter referred to as the act ) was issued on 23.06.1989 for purposes of planned development of delhi. a section 6 notification of the act was issued on 20.06.1990 and an award bearing no.8/92-93 was passed on ..... learned counsel for the parties. para 4 of the counter affidavit filed by the lac, reads as under: 4. that it is submitted that for purposes of planned development of delhi, the answering respondent issued a notification u/s 4 of the land acquisition act, 1894 on 23.6.1989 which was followed by notification u/s 6 of the said .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 29 2017 (HC)

Smt. Aman vs.govt. Of Nct of Delhi and Ors.

Court : Delhi

..... no.12096/2015 page 4 of 9 decided on 8th november, 2017, wherein a decision of the coordinate bench of this court in the case of sanjeev solanki v. delhi development authority and ors. w.p.(c) 1999/2015 decided on 24th january, 2017 so also a subsequent decision of this bench in the case of dhannu v. lt. ..... learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner would only seek compensation in terms of section 24 (2) of the new act. learned counsel for the petitioner while relying on the decision rendered in the case of pune municipal corporation & anr. v. harak chand misiri mal solanki & ors., reported at (2014) 3 scc183 submits that the petitioner is ..... sabha which has not been made as a necessary party in the present writ petition. that it is submitted that for the purpose of planned 6. development of delhi, the answering respondent issued a notification under section 4 of the land acquisition act, 1894 on 23.6.1989 which was followed by notification under section 6 of the said .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 29 2017 (HC)

Sh. Ajab Singh vs.govt. Of Nct of Delhi and Ors.

Court : Delhi

..... ors., w.p. (c) 4255/2016 decided on 8th november, 2017, wherein a decision of the coordinate bench of this court in the case of sanjeev solanki v. delhi development authority and ors. w.p.(c) 1999/2015 decided on 24th january, 2017 so also a subsequent decision of this bench in the case of dhannu v. lt. governor, ..... learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner would only seek compensation in terms of section 24 (2) of the new act. learned counsel for the petitioner while relying on the decision rendered in the case of pune municipal corporation & anr. v. harak chand misiri mal solanki & ors., reported at (2014) 3 scc183 submits that the petitioner is ..... which has not been made as a necessary party in the present writ petition.6. that it is submitted that for the purpose of planned development of delhi, the answering respondent issued a notification under section 4 of the land acquisition act, 1894 on 23.6.1989 which was followed by notification under section 6 of the said .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 29 2017 (HC)

Smt. Bhagrati vs.govt. Of Nct of Delhi and Ors.

Court : Delhi

..... ., w.p. (c) 4255/2016 decided on 8th november, 2017, wherein a decision of the coordinate bench of this court in the case of sanjeev solanki v. delhi development authority and ors. w.p.(c) 1999/2015 decided on 24th january, 2017 so also a subsequent decision of this bench in the case of dhannu v. lt. governor, ..... counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner would only seek compensation in terms of section 24 (2) of the new act. learned counsel for the petitioner while relying on the decision rendered in the case of pune municipal corporation & anr. v. harak chand misiri mal solanki & ors., reported at (2014) 3 scc183 submits that the petitioner is ..... delhi, the answering respondent issued a notification under section 4 of the land acquisition act, 1894 on 23.6.1989 which was followed by notification under section 6 of the said act dated 20.06.1990 for planned development of delhi for the acquisition of the lands falling in village ghonda gujran khadar. that an award bearing no.8 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 29 2017 (HC)

Sh. Gajraj vs.govt. Of Nct of Delhi and Ors.

Court : Delhi

..... ors., w.p. (c) 4255/2016 decided on 8th november, 2017, wherein a decision of the coordinate bench of this court in the case of sanjeev solanki v. delhi development authority and ors. w.p.(c) 1999/2015 decided on 24th january, 2017 so also a subsequent decision of this bench in the case of dhannu v. lt. governor, ..... are of the considered view that the necessary ingredients for the application of section 24(2) of the new act as has been interpreted by the supreme court of india and this court in the following cases stand satisfied: (1) pune municipal corporation & anr. v. harakchand misirimal solanki & ors., reported at 2014 3 scc183 (2) union of india and ..... delhi, the answering respondent issued a notification under section 4 of the land acquisition act, 1894 on 23.6.1989 which was followed by notification under section 6 of the said act dated 20.06.1990 for planned development of delhi for the acquisition of the lands falling in village ghonda gujran khadar. that an award bearing no.8/92 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 29 2017 (HC)

Sh. Raj Singh vs.govt. Of Nct of Delhi and Ors.

Court : Delhi

..... delhi & ors., w.p. (c) 4255/2016 decided on 8th november, 2017, wherein a decision of the coordinate bench of this court in the case of sanjeev solanki v. delhi development authority and ors. w.p.(c) no.12159/2015 page 4 of 8 w.p.(c) 1999/2015 decided on 24th january, 2017 so also a subsequent decision of this ..... is fully covered by the decision rendered by the supreme court of india in the case of pune municipal corporation & anr. (supra). paras 14 to 20 read as under: to them unless prevented by one of 14. section 31(1) of the 1894 act enjoins upon the collector, on making an award under section 11, to tender payment of compensation to persons ..... land is gaon sabha which has not been made as a necessary party in the present writ petition. that it is submitted that for the purpose of planned 6. development of delhi, the answering respondent issued a notification under section 4 of the land acquisition act, 1894 on 23.6.1989 which was followed by notification under section 6 of the said .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 29 2017 (HC)

Smt. Shamo vs.govt. Of Nct of Delhi and Ors.

Court : Delhi

..... & ors., w.p. (c) 4255/2016 decided on 8th november, 2017, wherein a decision of the coordinate bench of this court in the case of sanjeev solanki v. delhi development authority and ors. w.p.(c) 1999/2015 decided on 24th january, 2017 so also a subsequent decision of this bench in the case of dhannu v. lt. governor, govt ..... is fully covered by the decision rendered by the supreme court of india in the case of pune municipal corporation & anr. (supra). paras 14 to 20 read as under: to them unless prevented by one of 14. section 31(1) of the 1894 act enjoins upon the collector, on making an award under section 11, to tender payment of compensation to persons ..... is gaon sabha which has not been made as a necessary party in the present writ petition.6. that it is submitted that for the purpose of planned development of delhi, the answering respondent issued a notification under section 4 of the land acquisition act, 1894 on 23.6.1989 which was followed by notification under section 6 of the said .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 30 2017 (HC)

Rati Ram vs.govt of Nct of Delhi & Ors.

Court : Delhi

..... ors., w.p. (c) 4255/2016 decided on 8th november, 2017, wherein a decision of the coordinate bench of this court in the case of sanjeev solanki v. delhi development authority and ors. w.p.(c) 1999/2015 decided on 24th january, 2017 so also a subsequent decision of this court in the case of dhannu v. lt. governor, govt ..... of the petitioner is fully covered by the decision rendered by the supreme court of india in the case of pune municipal corporation & anr.(supra). paras 14 to 20 read as under: 14. section 31(1) of the 1894 act enjoins upon the collector, on making an award under section 11, to tender payment of compensation to persons interested entitled ..... delhi, the answering respondent issued a notification under section 4 of the land acquisition act, 1894 on 23.6.1989 which was followed by notification under section 6 of the said act dated 20.06.1990 for planned development of delhi for the acquisition of the lands falling in village garhi mendu. that an award bearing no.13/92-93 dated .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 30 2017 (HC)

Gajinder vs.govt of Nct of Delhi & Ors.

Court : Delhi

..... ors., w.p. (c) 4255/2016 decided on 8th november, 2017, wherein a decision of the coordinate bench of this court in the case of sanjeev solanki v. delhi development authority and ors. w.p.(c) 1999/2015 decided on 24th january, 2017 so also a subsequent decision of this court in the case of dhannu v. lt. governor, govt ..... of the petitioner is fully covered by the decision rendered by the supreme court of india in the case of pune municipal corporation & anr.(supra). paras 14 to 20 read as under: 14. section 31(1) of the 1894 act enjoins upon the collector, on making an award under section 11, to tender payment of compensation to persons interested entitled ..... delhi, the answering respondent issued a notification under section 4 of the land acquisition act, 1894 on 23.6.1989 which was followed by notification under section 6 of the said act dated 20.06.1990 for planned development of delhi for the acquisition of the lands falling in village garhi mendu. that an award bearing no.13/92-93 dated .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 30 2017 (HC)

Aman vs.govt of Nct of Delhi & Ors.

Court : Delhi

..... & ors., w.p. (c) 4255/2016 decided on 8th november, 2017, wherein a decision of the coordinate bench of this court in the case of sanjeev solanki v. delhi development authority and ors. w.p.(c) 1999/2015 decided on 24th january, 2017 so also a subsequent decision of this court in the case of dhannu v. lt. governor, govt ..... of the petitioner is fully covered by the decision rendered by the supreme court of india in the case of pune municipal corporation & anr.(supra). paras 14 to 20 read as under: 14. section 31(1) of the 1894 act enjoins upon the collector, on making an award under section 11, to tender payment of compensation to persons interested entitled thereto ..... delhi, the answering respondent issued a notification u/s 4 of the land acquisition act, 1894 on 23.6.1989 which was followed by notification under section 6 of the said act dated 20.06.1990 for planned development of delhi for the acquisition of the lands falling in village ghonda gujran khadar. that an award bearing no.8/92-93 .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //