Factoring - Judgment Search Results
Factor Vs. Laubenheimerl
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Dec-04-1933
Factor v. Laubenheimerl - 290 U.S. 276 (1933) U.S. Supreme Court Factor v. Laubenheimerl, 290 U.S. 276 (1933) Factor
Baranagore Jute Factor Plc Vs. Shreekishan Omprakash and Anr
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Mar-10-2015
APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO(s). 2814-2815 OF2015(arising out of Special Leave Petition (Civil) Nos.33342-43 of 2014) BARANAGORE JUTE FACTORY PLC. ...Appellant (s) versus SHREEKISHAN OMPRAKASH AND ANOTHER ...Respondent(s) WITH CIVIL APPEAL NO(s).2816 OF2015(arising out of Special Leave
SBI Global Factors Limited Vs. State of Maharashtra and Another
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Aug-02-2016
Oral Judgment: (A.S. Oka, J.) 1. As the regular Bench presided over by the Hon'ble Justice Shri N.H. Patil has declined to take up this Petition, as per the general standing order of the Hon'ble the...
18-section briefs on any result in this list
Ifci Factors Limited vs.gangotri Iron & Steel Co. Ltd & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-13-2017
truth.9. The plaintiff has instituted the suit claiming itself to be a “factor” under Section 2(i) of the Factoring Regulation CS(COMM) 1579/2016 Page 2 of 10 Act, 2011 and for recovery of receivables as an assignee under
Ifci Factors Ltd vs.spanco Limited & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-05-2018
1996.2. In the present application, it has been averred that the Clause 25 of the Agreement for the Factoring of Receivables dated 26th July, 2011 executed between the plaintiff and defendant No.1 contains an arbitration clause. CS
Ifci Factors Limited vs.m/s Mvl Limited & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-21-2018
OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:21. t December, 2018 + 1. CS(COMM) 355/2018 & I.As.10975-10976/2018 IFCI FACTORS LIMITED ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr.Anupam Srivastava, Ms.Shreya Mehta, Mr.Dhairya Gupta, Advocates. versus M/S MVL LIMITED & ANR .....
Ifci Factors Limited vs.ramsarup Industries Limited & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-01-2019
supplies to various clients, who were the approved debtors. Defendant No.1 approached the Plaintiff for grant of domestic factoring facility (hereinafter „facility‟). Defendant No.2 is a director of Defendant No.1. The facility was sanctioned by the Plaintiff
Ifci Factors Ltd vs.innoventive Industries Limited & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-07-2019
parts; (c) the defendant no.1 had entered into an agreement dated 27th August, 2009 with the plaintiff, for factoring of receivables, whereunder the plaintiff agreed to provide the domestic factoring with recourse facility to the defendant no.1,
Ifci Factors Ltd. Vs. State of Nct of Delhi and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-16-2014
complainant is a company incorporated under the Indian Companies Act, 1956 and is engaged in the business of factoring of receivables. The respondent No.2 company herein (accused No.1 company in the original complaint) is also a company
Ifci Factors Ltd. Vs. State of Nct of Delhi and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-18-2014
complainant is a company incorporated under the Indian Companies Act, 1956 and is engaged in the business of factoring of receivables. The respondent No.2 company herein (accused No.1 company in the original complaint) is also a company
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- Next ›
- Last »
Hover bars for counts · drag or use +/− to zoom · click a bar to filter by year
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free