F A A - Judgment Search Results
The Minister of Safety and Security Vs. F
Court: South Africa Supreme Court of Appeal
Decided on: Feb-22-2011
amount of R45, which was subsequently paid by the State. He stressed that his objective when he gave F a lift was to rape and not to help her. But he conceded that he would have been obliged … the rape had he not been provided with a vehicle as he would have been unable to give F a lift, acted as he did. [76] In K,71the Constitutional Court exhorted our courts to take account of the
Erach F.D. Mehta Vs. Minoo F.D. Mehta
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Sep-09-1970
Reported in: AIR1971SC1653; (1970)2SCC724; [1971]2SCR99
Shah, J.1. This appeal with special leave is filed against the judgment of a single Judge of the High Court of Bombay dismissing a petition under Section
Mr F Jesus Sagaya Raj vs Mrs F Philomina
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jan-21-2026
OF JANUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR WRIT PETITION NO.32918 OF 2025 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: MR F JESUS SAGAYA RAJ S/O LATE D. FRANCIS, AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.241/1, ABBAIAH REDDY LAYOUT, 7TH
18-section briefs on any result in this list
F.C.i. Class Iv Employees Union Vs. F.C.i.
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: May-17-1993
Reported in: (1994)IILLJ102P& H
ORDERJawaharlal Gupta, J. 1. Is the Food Corporation of India not entitled to employ a watchman as contract labour? This is the short question that
F.A.B. Axles (P) Ltd. Vs. F.A.G. Rugelfischer Georg Schafer
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-01-1997
Reported in: 1997VAD(Delhi)637; 1997(2)ARBLR453(Delhi); 68(1997)DLT433; 1997(42)DRJ517
Single Judge in is 6064/96 and is 6065/96 (in Suit No.1516/96). On 4.2.1997 learned Single Judge passed the following orders in the suit as well in the two misc. applications:'S.No.1516/96 2. One Mr. Devinder Singh appears for
F.C.i. Deputationists Association and ors. Vs. F.C.i. and ors.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Nov-06-1990
Reported in: (1991)1CALLT176(HC),1990LabIC199,(1992)ILLJ697Cal,1990(4)SLR41
Paritosh Kumar Mukherjee, J.1. Food Corporation of India Deputationists Association and others moved this writ petition on January 6, 1989, and, inter alia,
U.F.M. Manju Ramakrishna Naik Vs. U.F.M. Umesh Shridhar Shanbagh
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Apr-15-1977
Reported in: AIR1977Kant156; ILR1977KAR997; 1977(1)KarLJ445
100, Civil P. C. and directed against the decree in R. A. No. 139 of 1970 on the file of the Civil Judge, Karwar, dismissing the appeal of the appellant and affirming the decree in 0. S.
F.A.C.T. Employees' Association Vs. F.A.C.T. Limited and Ors.
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Apr-13-1976
Reported in: (1977)ILLJ182Ker
Kochu Thommen, J.1. Exhibit PI award is challenged in these two original petitions. An industrial dispute arose between Fertilisers and Chemicals Travancore Ltd., Udyogamandal (hereinafter referred to as the company) and its workmen represented by eight unions.
F.A.C.T. Employees' Association and Ors. Vs. Management of F.A.C.T. Lt ...
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Aug-27-1982
Reported in: (1983)ILLJ240Ker
K.K. Narendran, J.1. Some nice questions in industrial law arise for consideration in this case. The questions are:(1) When there is already a conciliation settlement under Section 12 of
R.F.C. Officers Association Vs. R.F.C. and ors.
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Sep-05-1988
Reported in: [1990(60)FLR286]; (1991)ILLJ505Raj
1. The petitioner has filed this writ petition challenging the orders Annexure-7 dated July 22, 1987 and Annexure-II, dated December 12, 1987. On
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »
Hover bars for counts · drag or use +/− to zoom · click a bar to filter by year
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free