Extract - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: extract Year: 2003 Page 1 of about 304 results (0.029 seconds)Kirloskar Electric Company Ltd. and anr. Vs. Utkal Solvent Extractions ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-06-2003
Reported in: 2003VAD(Delhi)267; 105(2003)DLT869; 2003(69)DRJ344; [2003]46SCL78(Delhi)
..... and service responsibility even during the warranty period respondent no 1 m s utkal solvents extractions p ltd ultimately filed an application under section 12 b of the mrtp act charging respondent ..... these proceedings the commission held that the compensation application filed by m s utkal solvent extractions p ltd is maintainable against the petitioners m s kirloskar electric company ltd 6 the .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTAli Agro Extract Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Commercial Ta ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Oct-07-2003
Reported in: [2006]146STC373(Kar)
orderr gururajan j 1 all agro extract pvt ltd is before me challenging the recovery proceedings initiated by the respondent state 2 .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSangam Solvent Extracts Ltd. Vs. Commr. of C. Ex.
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT
Decided on: Jun-26-2003
Reported in: (2006)STR181
1 after hearing for sometime with reference to the stay petition filed by the party i find that the matter...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTKhandesh Extraction Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex.
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Decided on: Jul-28-2003
Reported in: (2003)(156)ELT928Tri(Mum.)bai
1 duty of rs 34 240 has been demanded and penalty of rs 17 000 imposed on the finding that...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTM.J. Exports Ltd. Vs. Kalyan Solvent Extraction Ltd.
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Mar-07-2003
Reported in: [2004]50SCL114(MP)
a m sapre j 1 this company petition is filed by the creditor of the respondent company on the ground...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCommissioner of Income-tax Vs. Sesa Goa Ltd.,
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Jul-16-2003
Reported in: (2004)188CTR(Bom)120; [2004]266ITR126(Bom)
..... appellate tribunal and the questions which have been raised here the question there is whether extraction of ore and the various processes would involve production the expression production again is no ..... and it is a definite point that parliament employed the expression production to the minerals extracted from underneath the surface for all those reasons the learned division bench took the view .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTDabur India Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Aug-28-2003
Reported in: 2003LC129(SC); 2003(157)ELT129(SC)
..... was concerned however the commissioner decided the proceedings against the appellant holding that the extracts were properly classifiable under chapter 13 the appellant s further appeal to the tribunal ..... be considered as goods attracting the scope of excise levy mixed or compounded vegetable extracts which have therapeutic or prophylactic value are appropriately classifiable under heading 30 03 of .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTN.K. Proteins Ltd. Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax
Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Ahmedabad
Decided on: Jan-24-2003
Reported in: (2004)83TTJ(Ahd.)904
..... cheques the learned senior departmental representative submitted a letter dt 18th dec 2002 the relevant extracts of the said letter are reproduced as below as directed during the course of hearing ..... drawn during the course of hearing it may be pertinent to reproduce herein the relevant extracts from the order passed by the appellate authority for industrial and financial reconstruction in appeal .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTinterlink Petroleum Ltd. Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax
Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Ahmedabad
Decided on: Oct-16-2003
Reported in: (2004)83TTJ(Ahd.)274
..... the mining operations in 1958 it claimed the expenditure incurred for the purpose of extracting limestone as also depreciation and development rebate for the machinery installed for that purpose ..... activity hence the assessee commenced its business when it started the activity of extraction of limestone since extraction of limestone commenced in 1958 the assessee was carrying on business during the .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTPankaj Kumar Mondal Vs. State of West Bengal and ors.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Aug-05-2003
Reported in: 2004(2)CHN346
..... the demand notice dated 20th november 1990 for alleged unauthorized extraction of sand was disposed of by tarun chatterjee j as ..... pendency of court case regarding the demand for alleged unauthorized extraction of sand on 20th december 1990 the petitioner applied for ..... previous 1986 lease or in connection with the alleged unauthorized extraction of sand the dllro was not empowered to render the .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial