Extract - Judgment Search Results

Vinay Solvent Extraction Industries Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Cent ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR2005SC3049; 2005(100)ECC16; 2005(183)ELT113(SC); JT2005(4)SC464; (2005)4SCC584

S A T I O NI/We, Vijay Oil Mill, Outside Majevadi Gate, Junagadh hereby authorize M/s. Vinay Solvent Extraction Industries Private Limited of Sukhpur, Junagadh (holding Central Excise licence in form L.4 No. JUN/VNEO/2/80 to manufacture/fabricate on

Kerala Solvent Extractions Ltd. Vs. A. Unnikrishnan and anr.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: 1994(1)KLT651(SC); (1994)IILLJ888SC; 1994(1)SCALE631

ORDER1. We have heard learned Counsel on both sides. Special leave granted.2. The appellants challenges the order dated 4thy June, 1993 passed by the High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam in Writ Appeal No. 269 of...

Aikex Spice Extracts Pvt. Ltd., vs Union of India,

Court: Kerala

MR. JUSTICE GOPINATH P. FRIDAY, THE 26TH DAY OF JULY 2024 / 4TH SRAVANA, 1946 PETITIONER: AIKEX SPICE EXTRACTS PVT. LTD., AGED 47 YEARS, AIKKARAKUDIYIL CHAMBERS, 5TH FLOOR, HEAVENLY PLAZA, PADAMUGAL, THRIKKAKARA, KOCHI - 682 021, REPRESENTED

Neo Neem Extractions Pvt Ltd Vs Deputy Registrar of Companies

Court: Chennai

03-03-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY AND WMP NO. 8313 OF 2022,WMP NO. 8314 OF 20221. Neo Neem Extractions Pvt Ltd No.07, Third Street, Kamdar Nagar, Nungambakkam, Chennai-34, Rep. by its Director K.Venkataramani2. K.Venkataramani S/o.P.Krishnamurthy, No.97, third

Ali Agro Extract Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Commercial Ta ...

Court: Karnataka

Reported in: [2006]146STC373(Kar)

ORDERR. Gururajan, J.1. All Agro Extract Pvt. Ltd., is before me challenging the recovery proceedings initiated by the respondent-State.2. The admitted facts reveal that

Rajam Extractions Ltd., Rep. by Its Executive Director, V. Ramakrishna ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 2004(5)ALD80; 2004(6)ALT24

the respondent was served with notice, none represents the respondent. The present appeal is preferred by M/s Rajam Extractions Ltd., Penubaka, represented by its Executive Director aggrieved by the judgment in un-numbered suit (G.R.No.320, dated 15-02-2002) on

Vinay Extraction Pvt. Limited Vs. Vijay Khanna

Court: Gujarat

Reported in: (2004)190CTR(Guj)495; [2004]271ITR450(Guj)

M.S. Shah, J.1. What is challenged in this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution is the order dated 21.11.1995 (Annexure 'A') passed by the Commissioner of Income-tax, Rajkot rejecting the petitioner's application for condonation of...

Saurasthra Solvent Extraction Co. Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Regional Provident Fun ...

Court: Gujarat

Reported in: [2006(109)FLR179]; (2006)IILLJ962Guj

is a Company registered under the provisions of the Companies Act and is carrying on business of solvant extraction and is regularly paying Fund Commissioner the contribution payable by it under the Act since last 35 years

United Solvent Extractions Private Limited Vs. the Tamilnadu Civil Sup ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: (2004)4MLJ65

polished raw rice bran, and cone polished boiled rice bran, to the successful tenderer viz., M/s. United Solvent Extracts Limited, Athur, following the usual tender procedure. On the basis of the confirmation of the tender, a communication

Siddaganga Oil Extractions Private Limited, Tumkur. Vs. Pioneer Feeds ...

Court: Karnataka

Reported in: 2009(1)KCCR125; 2009(3)KantLJ431; 2009(3)KarLJ431

a decree for payment of money is provided under Order 21, Rule 58 CPC. It is useful to extract Order 21, Rule 58 which reads as under:"R.58. Adjudication of claims to, or objections to attachment of property.