Expressly - Judgment Search Results

Block Vs. Board of School Lands

Court: US Supreme Court

..... s reliance on this principle is surprising since it expressly declines to decide whether without the quiet title act sovereign ..... 442 u s 667 1979 rule that statute must expressly include sovereign is particularly applicable where the statute imposes a ..... the states of a congressionally imposed statute of limitations not expressly including the states here the legislative history shows that .....

Rice Vs. Rehner

Court: US Supreme Court

..... state laws generally are not applicable to indians on a reservation except where congress has expressly provided that state laws shall apply when application would be tantamount to a formalistic ..... of exclusive tribal self government that requires the deference reflected in our requirement that congress expressly provide for the application of state law we have only to determine whether application .....

Jefferson Cty. Pharm. Ass'n Vs. Abbott Labs.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... rights prerogatives or privileges of the sovereign unless it expressly so provided this reason would apply only to the federal ..... significant the fact that later attempts in congress to expressly include governmental entities within the coverage of the act failed ..... competition through sales at discriminatory prices the subcommittee said nothing expressly about the unfair competition at issue in this case .....

Guardians Assn. Vs. Civil Svc. Comm'n

Court: US Supreme Court

..... private cause of action under title vi is one implied by the judiciary rather than expressly created by congress we should respect the foregoing considerations applicable in spending clause cases ..... senators keating and ribicoff who unsuccessfully proposed an amendment adding to title vi a provision expressly allowing the institution of a civil action or other proper proceeding for preventive relief .....

A. Gupta Trust Estate Vs. Commissioner of Wealth-tax

Court: Guwahati

..... 4 to 24 it appears that if a special or local law expressly excludes the operation of sections 4 to 24 the question of ..... provisions of law that is why section 27 2 of the act expressly empowers the appellate tribunal to extend the period of limitation in ..... of the said act section 3 of the limitation act was therefore expressly excluded similarly there is a positive command that an election petition .....

Ramdhan Vs. Bhanwarlal

Court: Rajasthan

Reported in: AIR1985Raj185; 1983()WLN439

..... at common law there unless the statute contains words which expressly or by necessary implication exclude the common law remedy the ..... to pending proceedings by enacting section 39 1 therein to expressly restrict the right of appeal to all decrees and orders ..... a statute forbids the performance of certain things only those things expressly mentioned are forbidden so also if the statute directs that .....

United States Vs. Mitchell

Court: US Supreme Court

..... necessary legislative authorization of a damages remedy none of the statutes contains any provision that expressly makes the united states liable for its alleged mismanagement of indian forest resources and ..... will have been drained of all meaning moreover many of the federal statutes that expressly provide money damages as a remedy against the united states in carefully limited circumstances .....

Kuppu Alias Kuppammal Vs. Kuppuswami Mandiri and ors.

Court: Chennai

Reported in: (1984)2MLJ224

..... which imposed exclusion from inheritance it rules out disqualification on any ground whatsoever excepting those expressly recognized by any provisions of the act unchastity of a widow is not a disqualification ..... cannot be said that the hindu women s rights to property act 1937 has either expressly or by necessary intendment done away with the personal disqualification like unchastity imposed by hindu .....

Bush Vs. Lucas

Court: US Supreme Court

..... courts of limited jurisdiction whose remedial powers do not extend beyond the granting of relief expressly authorized by congress footnote 11 under the former approach petitioner would obviously prevail under the ..... kind of federal litigation congress has not resolved the question presented by this case by expressly denying petitioner the judicial remedy he seeks or by providing him with an equally .....

Govindbhai Parshottamdas Patel and ors. Vs. New Shorrock Mills, Nadiad

Court: Gujarat

Reported in: AIR1984Guj182; (1984)1GLR156

..... act which not only confers a special exclusive jurisdiction on certain existing courts but also expressly bars the jurisdiction of other courts to entertain and decide the question relating to ..... the cases pertaining to the questions mentioned therein the section again in the latter part expressly provides that no other court shall have jurisdiction to entertain any such suit proceeding application .....