Expressly - Judgment Search Results

Mrs. Maneka Gandhi Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and anr.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1978SC597; (1978)1SCC248; [1978]2SCR621

..... thus imposed normally would apply only within the territory of india unless the legislation expressly or by necessary implication provides for extra territorial operation in the penal code under ..... of the enactments restricting the rights under article 19 2 is there any provision expressly or by necessary implication providing for extra territorial application a citizen cannot enforce his .....

Santa Clara Pueblo Vs. Martinez

Court: US Supreme Court

..... for declaratory and injunctive relief asserted here by respondents though not expressly authorized by the statute is nonetheless implicit in its terms ..... s 553 187 u s 565 1903 congress retains authority expressly to authorize civil actions for injunctive or other relief to ..... whether a private remedy is implicit in a statute not expressly providing one whether the plaintiff is one of the class .....

Anand Oil Industries Vs. Labour Court, Hyderabad and ors.

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: AIR1979AP182

..... act and the provisions of that act shall save as otherwise expressly provided apply accordingly section 22 of the payment of bonus ..... those acts or cannot be agitated before any other forums not expressly barred after the period of six months prescribed under those ..... those forums unless the jurisdiction of either of them is barred expressly or by necessary implication that bench also observed that the .....

California Vs. United States

Court: US Supreme Court

..... as a floor amendment by representative later speaker cannon to expressly preserve states control over reclamation within their borders it was ..... and becomes paramount as to every foot of soil unless expressly reserved to the general government and subject to the right ..... that 8 did not bear on distribution rights but also expressly disagreed with its special master and squarely rejected claims that .....

Rameshchandra Ramanbhai Patel and anr. Vs. Collector and ors.

Court: Gujarat

Reported in: (1979)1GLR191

..... and collocation of the section under consideration which goes either expressly or impliedly against such requirement on a conjoint reading of ..... the act and that thereafter it was not required either expressly or by necessary implication to perform such duty at every ..... to the one man one vote rule unless contrary intention expressly or by necessary implication becomes manifest in the relevant statutory .....

The Delhi Cloth and General Mills Co. Ltd. Vs. the Municipal Council, ...

Court: Rajasthan

Reported in: AIR1978Raj177; 1978(11)WLN265

..... or exceptional cases the notification dated 13th may 1968 neither expressly nor impliedly repeals the notification dated 14th feb 1968 it ..... about the exclusion of the jurisdiction of civil courts either expressly or by necessary implication must be considered in every case ..... before a civil court that its jurisdiction is excluded either expressly or by necessary implication to entertain claims of a civil .....

Monell Vs. Department of Soc. Svcs.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... rights because 1 of the civil rights act does not state expressly that municipal corporations come within its ambit it is finally ..... that section applied but this is not the case first opponents expressly distinguished between imposing an obligation to keep the peace and ..... education assn et al as amici curiae 15 16 indeed congress expressly reiterated that a cause of action cognizable in the federal .....

Hutto Vs. Finney

Court: US Supreme Court

..... t 1926 no 725 footnote 31 the attorney general argues that the statute itself must expressly abrogate the states immunity from retroactive liability relying on employees v missouri public health welfare ..... case the claimed constitutional violation is the infliction of cruel and unusual punishment which is expressly prohibited by the eighth but not by the fourteenth amendment while the court has held .....

Adamo Wrecking Co. Vs. United States

Court: US Supreme Court

..... 20 six weeks after the first court ruling the administrator proposed an amendment that would expressly confirm his authority to establish design equipment or work practice standards when numerical emission ..... of the original meaning of the 1970 amendments but what congress did when it expressly authorized work practice rules persuasively indicates that if congress in 1970 had focused on the .....

T.K. Roy, Vs. Commissioner of Wealth-tax

Court: Guwahati

..... retroactive effect unless the legislature has made it so expressly or by necessary implication the learned counsel submits that ..... the provision of a section where no such retrospectiveoperation is expressly enacted 84 a number of decisions have been cited ..... cardinal principle of criminal jurisprudence that unless otherwise provided expressly or by necessary implication the penalty that was provided .....