Expression - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: expression Year: 2021 Page 1 of about 300 results (0.043 seconds)Delhi Airport Metro Express Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Delhi Metro Rail Corporation ...
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Sep-09-2021
..... words every error of law committed by the arbitral tribunal would not fall within the expression patent illegality likewise erroneous application of law cannot be categorised as patent illegality in ..... equity according to the appellant the division bench committed an error in concluding that the expression adjusted equity in the concession agreement should be calculated by taking into account only .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTRajeev Suri Vs. Union Of India
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Jan-05-2021
..... had the right to know intelligible details explaining the proposal to participate and express themselves give suggestions and submit objections the proposed changes unlike policy decisions would ..... and promises into actual practice further citizens approach elected representatives and through them express their views both in favour and against proposed legislations and policy measures nevertheless .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTForum For Peoples Collective Efforts (fpce) Vs. The State Of West Beng ...
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: May-04-2021
..... of simultaneous obedience it depends upon the intention of the paramount legislature to express by its enactment completely exhaustively or exclusively what shall be the law governing ..... expressly recognize the existence of state enactments regulating construction activities the definition of the expression commencement certificate in section 2 m is as follows m commencement certificate means .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTEngineering Analysis Centre Of Excellence Private Limited Vs. The Comm ...
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Mar-02-2021
..... on analysis of various provisions of chapter xvii one finds the use of different expressions however the expression sum chargeable under the provisions of the act is used only in section 195 ..... interpretation 1 1 in this agreement unless the context requires otherwise the following words and expressions shall have the following meanings authorized use the specified level at which licensee is .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTJaishri Laxmanrao Patil Vs. The Chief Minister And Ors.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: May-05-2021
..... s report came for consideration before the rajya sabha during the debate members have expressed their apprehension regarding adversely affecting the rights of the state by the proposed ..... following effect 366 definition in this constitution unless the context otherwise requires the following expressions have as the meanings hereby respectively assigned to them 26c socially and educationally backward .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTUnion Of India Vs. Vkc Footsteps India Pvt. Ltd.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Sep-13-2021
..... provisos restrict this ambit by the use of the expression allowed the expression allowed appears in all the three provisos b the ..... not ordinarily fall within the common understanding of the expression thus the expression goods is defined to mean every kind of movable ..... provision and its enforcement happens through the proviso viii the expression allowed should be interpreted to mean verification of the .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTP. Mohanraj Vs. M/s. Shah Brothers Ispat Pvt. Ltd.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Mar-01-2021
..... lekhi learned additional solicitor general took strong objection to the use of the expression quasi criminal to describe proceedings under section 138 of the negotiable instruments act ..... recommendations of the committee have been generally accepted by government after considering the views expressed on those recommendations by the state governments union territory administrations the supreme court .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSri. Mahaboob Sab Vs. State Of Karnataka
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jan-19-2021
..... construction or iii use and occupation of unauthorised structures 32 inasmuch as the aforementioned expressions are defined employing the term grabbing it is necessary to ascertain the import of ..... relevant statutes and the rules mentioned hereinbefore are in my opinion on these points not expressive enough to betray an intention to transgress constitutional limitations i am afraid that reference .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSri. Venkatesh Vs. State Of Karnataka
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jan-19-2021
..... construction or iii use and occupation of unauthorised structures 32 inasmuch as the aforementioned expressions are defined employing the term grabbing it is necessary to ascertain the import of ..... relevant statutes and the rules mentioned hereinbefore are in my opinion on these points not expressive enough to betray an intention to transgress constitutional limitations i am afraid that reference .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBoralingaiah Vs. State Of Karnataka
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jan-19-2021
..... construction or iii use and occupation of unauthorised structures 32 inasmuch as the aforementioned expressions are defined employing the term grabbing it is necessary to ascertain the import of ..... relevant statutes and the rules mentioned hereinbefore are in my opinion on these points not expressive enough to betray an intention to transgress constitutional limitations i am afraid that reference .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial