Expose - Judgment Search Results

Baker (Respondent) Vs. Quantum Clothing Group Limited (Appellants) and ...

Court: UK Supreme Court

..... standards adopted proved to be too severe in some respects the industries affected might be exposed to heavy unnecessary expenditure on the other hand if minimum standards were adopted these would ..... particular workers would fall into that category what was certain was that if they were exposed over a sufficiently long period some at least of their workforce would suffer permanent irremediable .....

Sienkiewicz (Administratrix of the Estate of Enid Costello Deceased) ( ...

Court: UK Supreme Court

..... from buildings due to normal occupation and weathering lord rodger defendants whose breaches of duty expose someone to asbestos and so materially increase the risk that he will develop mesothelioma ..... different companies but he submitted that where the claimant alleges that only one defendant wrongfully exposed her to asbestos and environmental exposure is also a possible source of the asbestos which .....

indus. Union Dept. Vs. Amer. Petroleum Inst.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... industry contentions that certain epidemiological studies indicating no excess risk of leukemia among workers exposed at levels below 10 ppm were sufficient to establish that the threshold level ..... secretary observed that individuals have differences in their susceptibility to leukemia ibid among those exposed to benzene was a group of unknown but possibly substantial size having various predisposing .....

Barker and Others (Respondent) Vs. Corus (Uk) Plc (Appellants)

Court: House of Lords

..... connection is ever capable of being established for lord nicholls proof that an employer wrongfully exposed his employee to the risk of contracting mesothelioma should be regarded as a sufficient degree ..... been suffered during a period of non tortious exposure it is suggested that the tortious exposers should escape liability altogether there is considerable logic in this one way of explaining .....

Trigger - Bai (Run Off) Limited (In Scheme of Arrangement) (Appellant) ...

Court: UK Supreme Court

..... reference to the date s of exposure where successive employers with different insurers had exposed a particular employee victim to asbestos liability was in practice apportioned between the employers ..... these appeals the application of the insurances in respect of mesothelioma suffered by employees exposed to asbestos during their employment by an insured employer did not appear controversial this .....

Apprendi Vs. New Jersey

Court: US Supreme Court

..... reasons structural democratic constraints exist to discourage legislatures from enacting penal statutes that expose every defendant convicted of for example weapons possession to a maximum sentence exceeding that ..... state legislatures to narrow sentencing discretion in the capital punishment context facts that expose a convicted defendant to a capital sentence may be different from all other facts .....

Metro-north Commuter R. Co. Vs. Buckley

Court: US Supreme Court

..... circuit no 96 320 argued february 18 1997 decided june 23 1997 respondent buckley was exposed to insulation dust containing asbestos while employed as a pipefitter by petitioner railroad since ..... cf 29 cfr 1910 1001 1 1996 requiring employers to provide medical monitoring for workers exposed to asbestos the occupational safety and health administration regulations which the dissent cites help .....

The Modern theatres Ltd. Vs. the Deputy Superintendent of Central Exci ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: (1967)2MLJ355

..... the relevant portions of the notification run as follows the central government exempts cinematograph films exposed which conform to the description specified in column 1 of the table hereto annexed and ..... is in excess of column 2 of the said table provided that where cinematograph films exposed are cleared from home consumption after twelve months immediately following the month of certification by .....

Ministry of Defence (Respondent) Vs. Ab and Others (Appellants)

Court: UK Supreme Court

..... no reason to suppose that these processes in fact expose or exposed him to some noxious substance 177 the problem in ..... i an allegation in para 2 that each veteran was exposed to radiation radiation contamination radioactivity radioactive fallout and or biological ..... diminished although the claimants believed that the veterans had been exposed to ionising radiation there was no objective ground for this .....

Smt. Selvi and ors. Vs. State of Karnataka

Court: Supreme Court of India

..... individuals then why is there no prohibition against compelled testimony in civil cases which could expose parties to adverse consequences furthermore questions have also been asked about the scope of ..... apprehension of implication from his answer this conclusion also flows from tendency to be exposed to a criminal charge a criminal charge covers any criminal charge then under investigation .....