Export Value - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: export value Year: 2008 Page 1 of about 623 results (0.113 seconds)Rahee Industries Ltd. Vs. Export Credit Guarantee Corpn. of India Ltd. ...
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Oct-17-2008
Reported in: [2008]146CompCas373(SC); JT2008(12)SC244; (2009)2MLJ458(SC); 2008(13)SCALE261; (2009)1SCC38; 2009(1)SCC138
..... after six months from the date of each shipment initially the exporter got 20 of the invoice value as advance the goods were exported on credit for the balance price of 80 which was ..... learned single judge in appeal division bench set aside judgment and decree appellant exporter got 20 per cent of invoice value as advance 80 per cent of balance amount deposited by consignee with .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTS.N. Kapoor Exports and ors. Vs. Saraswati Exports and ors.
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Feb-12-2008
Reported in: RLW2008(3)Raj3782
g s sarraf j 1 brief facts giving rise to the present controversy may be stated thus mr mahipal singh...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTHanu Reddy Realty India Pvt. Ltd., Rep. by Its Director, Mr. C. Suresh ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-04-2008
Reported in: III(2008)BC190; 2008(1)CTC721; (2008)2MLJ896
possible price must in the context mean the fair market value 30 in gajraj jain case cited supra the apex court
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTO.L. of Ilaxi Modi Export Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Ilaxi D. Modi and 2 ors.
Court: Gujarat
Decided on: Apr-17-2008
Reported in: [2008]144CompCas277(Guj); (2008)3CompLJ534(Guj)
..... as 10 9 1998 and advance was made to m s modi exports the value of the realizable debt is again shown as nil after scrutinizing the ..... 00 000 are recoverable from m s modi exports as per the books of accounts however estimated realizable value is shown as nil it was also ..... circumstances they have estimated the realizable value of debt of rs 50 00 000 as nil from m s modi exports in which the accused no .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTGujarat Ambuja Exports Limited Vs. C.C.
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Ahmedabad
Decided on: Feb-21-2008
the entry description or in the law subsequent to the exports and the same provision stands re considered by the dgft
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTG.T. Exports Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise,
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu
Decided on: Jul-04-2008
not admissible as no manufacture was involved the appellants had exported materials procured as such as there was no manufacture the
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSwaroop Shipping Services Vs. Cc (Seaport-exports)
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu
Decided on: Feb-07-2008
Reported in: (2008)(128)ECC265
time between the cfs and the container terminal while the export goods were still within the functional domain of the cha
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTAlagendran Exports Pvt. Ltd. Vs. State of Kerala
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Aug-12-2008
Reported in: [2008]16STT111
..... is total confusion regarding the facts the transactions undertaken cover exports and deemed exports sale in this civil appeal we are concerned only with ..... 92 67 236 made by the appellant were purchases in the course of export and if so ..... the question as to whether the purchases of the value of rs 1 .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTExotic Granite Exports Rep. by Its Managing Partner Sri. K. Ramachandr ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Mar-26-2008
Reported in: 2009(5)ALT200
..... learned senior counsel representing the respective respondents 2 the writ petitioner m s exotic granite exports filed the present writ petition praying for quashing the proceedings of 1st respondent in ..... firms individuals keeping in view the overall development of the state by way of value addition since the government is having discretion to consider the applications overlooking priorities both .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCommissioner of Income-tax and anr. Vs. Hinduja Exports
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Feb-21-2008
Reported in: [2009]312ITR61(KAR); [2009]312ITR61(Karn)
should be ignored when aggregating the total turnover including other exports by not taking into consideration the specific definition adduced in instance of the revenue under section 260a of the income tax act 1961 against the order passed by the income tax
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial