Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: explosives act 1884 section 4 definitions Year: 2003 Page 7 of about 4,577 results (0.102 seconds)

Securities and Exchange Board of India Vs. Sangeeta Jayesh Valia

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : (2004)2CompLJ347(Bom); [2004]50SCL641(Bom)

..... ,50,000, in both the cases.7. the respondent therefore, preferred two appeals, before the securities appellate tribunal, mumbai, under section 29 read with section 15j of sebi act on 29-8-2000, against the above orders. the said appeals were contested by the present appellant. after hearing both the parties ..... speech or law case esp. for newspaper publication, house of commons debate on bill when reported periodical statement on public work. 3. sound of explosion.as per webster dictionary 1959 edition 'information 'means: 1. knowledge communicated or received concerning a particular fact or circumstance, news information concerning a crime ..... only) for violation of regulation 3(4), sebi (substantial acquisition of shares and takeover) regulations 1997 (for short takeover regulations, 1997) and section 15a(b) of sebi act, against the respondent, (original appellant), were set-aside. thereby appeals filed by the respondent herein, were allowed. therefore, the appellants herein (original .....

Kamma Otukunta Ram Naidu Vs. Chereddy Pedda Subba Reddy and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR2003SC3342; 2003(2)ALD(Cri)761; 2004(1)ALT12(SC); 2003CriLJ4967; [2004(1)JCR188(SC)]; JT2003(Suppl2)SC264; 2003(7)SCALE643; (2003)11SCC293

..... of the penal code and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of two years. respondent nos. 1, 2 and 4 were also convicted under section 3 of the explosive substances act and each one of them was sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for two years. all the sentences, however, were ordered to run concurrently. so far as the other ..... prosecution case inasmuch as when immediately after registering the case, he inspected the place of occurrence, dead body was found in the field in question together with signs of bomb explosion.9. turning now to the ocular version of the occurrence given by pws 1 to 4, who claim to be eyewitnesses, it may be stated that pws 1 and ..... 1/2' x 1/2'. blackening of skin present.8. according to the doctor, all the injuries except injury nos. 2, 5 and 7 could have been caused by explosion of country made bomb whereas injury nos. 2,5 and 7, which were incised wounds, could be by sharp edged weapon like hunting sickle. the doctor opined that the .....

Atibur Rahaman Vs. State of West Bengal

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : 2003(2)CHN427

..... present case.5. police after investigation submitted charge sheet on 31.8.2000 vide charge sheet no. 239/2000 under sections 147/148/149/326/307/302 of the indian penal code and sections 3 and 4 of the explosive substances act against the present petitioner and others showing this accused petitioner at sl. no. 10 as absconder.6. it was ..... g. r. case no. 697 of 1990) in connection with beldanga police station case no. 112 dated 28.5.1998 under sections 147/148/149/326/307/302 of the indian penal code and sections 3 and 4 of the explosive substances act, now pending in the court of the ld. s. d. j. m. berhampore, murshidabad.2. the short facts leading ..... obtained an order for stay to move the sessions court. this direction of the magistrate was wholly irregular and may be, enabled the accused persons to circumvent the principle of section 439 cr. p. c. we might have taken a serious view of such a course, indifferent to mandatory provisions, by the subordinate magistrate but for the fact that .....

Heera Lal Pandit Alias Hira Lal Vs. State of Bihar

Court : Patna

..... which was called for on 2-4-2003, it appears' that mirganj p.s. case no. 340/2001 under sections 302, 341, 120b of the indian penal code read with section 3/4 of the explosive substances act was registered against the petitioner and other accused persons. the police forwarded the accused persons with the first information report ..... question arises as to whether the learned magistrate had jurisdiction to pass an order of release/discharge of the petitioner before submission of the final form.7. section 156 of the code of criminal procedure (hereinafter referred to as 'the code') empowers the police officer to investigate cognizable cases for which information relating to ..... forwarded the accused persons under custody to the chief judicial magistrate. gopalganj, who was empowered to take cognizance of the offence and try the same.9. section 173 of the code speaks about the submission of the report by the police after completion of investigation and in the instant, case, it appears that the .....

Ruplal Sao Vs. State of Bihar (Now Jharkhand)

Court : Jharkhand

Reported in : [2003(2)JCR602(Jhr)]

..... default thereof to undergo s.i. for one month. however, the appellant was acquitted for the offence punishable under sections 3 and 4 of the explosive substance act and also for the offence under section 25(1b) and 27 of the arms act. 2. the prosecution case has arisen on the basis of fardbeyan (ext-7) of pw 8 gango sao, ..... and in this view of the matter the fardbeyan (ext. 7) suffers with infirmity under the provisions of section 161 of the cr. p.c. it has also been submitted that allegation under the explosive substance act and the arms act have been found to be false and not legally proved due to the non- production of the countrymade pistol ..... and manner of occurrence not being in conformity with the medical evidence and as such the conviction of the appellant under section 302/34 of the indian penal .....

i. Varalakshmi and ors. Vs. Andhra Pradesh State Road Transport Corpor ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : 2005ACJ384; ILR2004KAR815

..... should be a causal connection not necessarily a direct and immediate one between the use of the vehicle and the accident causing death or injuries to the claimants. an explosion that takes place hours after the vehicle has turned turtle or a case where the passengers in autorickshaw commit a crime by looting and killing the driver have thus ..... nearby. the court also rejected the contention that after the collision since the tanker had turned turtle, it had ceased to be a motor vehicle so that any explosion on account of the petrol leaking from the tanker could not be said to be an accident arising out of the use of such a vehicle. the petrol tanker ..... the supreme court in minu b. mehta v. balakrishna ramachandra nayan 1977 acj 118 holds the field making proof of fault essential in cases of fault under section 166 of the motor vehicles act. in kaushnuma begum's case supra, the apex court has no doubt borrowed and applied the rule of strict liability as propounded in rylanda v. fletcher .....

Collector of Central Excise Vs. J.K. Udaipur Udyog

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : 2004(177)ELT133(Raj); RLW2004(1)Raj246; 2003(4)WLC418

..... reference has been made to us by the customs, excise and gold (control) appellate tribunal, new delhi, under section 35g(1) of the central excise act, to consider the following question of law:'whether the explosive used in the respondents' mines situated outside the premises of their cement factory, for the purpose of excavating limestone ..... excise rules, 1944.4. the assistant commissioner disallowed the credit on the ground that the mining area was situated outside the factory and therefore, the explosives did not qualify for the credit. this order of the assistant commissioner was sustained by the commissioner (appeals).5. thereafter, the respondent preferred an appeal ..... so extracted was exempt from payment of excise duty by reason of exemption notification. the respondent claimed that in manufacture of cement, it had used explosives which were inputs and in respect of which notification had been issued by the central government. the respondent claimed modvat credit under rule 57a of .....

Ambuja Cement Rajasthan Ltd. and Vs. Cce

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in : (2004)(91)ECC484

..... relevant rule governing input duty credit is rule 3 of the cenvat credit rules, 2001. the ground on which the credits taken by the appellants in these appeals on explosives under the said rule was disallowed by the lower appellate authority is that the said goods does not fit in the definition of "input" under clause (f) of ..... v. birla corporation ltd., 2002 (146) elt 215, this submission is not contested. in the cited cases, one of the issues considered by this bench was whether the explosives used by the respondents for mining limestone at sites outside their cement factory were eligible inputs for modvat purpose. in each of the two cases, the relevant period was april ..... therefore, apply to the instant cases as well.accordingly, these two appeals are also allowed.6. if any deposit made by any of these appellants under section 35-f of the central excise act is lying with the department, the same shall be refunded to them as early as possible, at any rate within a period of 30 days from the .....

Premier Explosives Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT

Reported in : (2004)(92)ECC312

..... pleaded that it is a well settled law that transportation charges from factory gate to depot and turnover tax are allowable deduction under section 4 of central excise act.6. shri l. narasimha murthy learned jdrappeared on behalf of the revenue. he pleaded that in these cases, the orders passed by ..... , they are being disposed of by this common order.3. the fact in brief are that m/s premier explosives ltd are manufacturers of prepared explosives. they clear the explosives manufactured by them by stock transfer to their depots and consignment agents on payment of duty on the basis of ..... commissioner (appeals) are liable to be set aside as the same are contrary to the provisions of section 4 of central excise act. in terms of section 4(2) of central excise act, 1944 where the price of excisable goods for delivery at the place of removal is not known and ..... 1. these are the four appeals filed by m/s premier explosives ltd. against order nos. 74/99 (h-iii) ce, 75/99 (h-iii) ce, 76/99 (h-iii) .....

United India Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Astarul Nissa and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : I(2004)ACC463; III(2004)ACC828; 2005ACJ982

..... the other motor vehicle the tanker had fallen on one of its side on sloping ground resulting in escape of highly inflammable petrol and that there was grave risk of explosion and fire from the petrol coming out of the tanker. in the light of the aforesaid circumstances the learned judges of the high court have rightly concluded that the ..... a result of overturning of petrol tanker, petrol contained in it leaked out and collected nearby. at about 7.15 a.m. about 4 1/2 hours of accident an explosion took place in the said petrol tanker, resulting in fire, causing death and injuries to few persons. the case on behalf of petrol tanker was that at the time ..... that the death was not caused by the tractor-trolley and was caused by the bus and, therefore, the appellant was not liable for compensation under the provisions of section 147 of the act. he contended that the tractor-trolley was standing and as a result of being dashed by the bus, the trolley turned and fell on the deceased, munir ahmad .....