Court : Karnataka
Decided on : Jan-14-2003
Reported in : 2003CriLJ2661; ILR2003KAR1541
..... around the courts for over years to find their cases expeditiously disposed of. the compelling situation activated and prompted the concerned authorities to act swiftly to find out a solution to the problem of docket explosion. in the said context, with a noble object and social purpose under a special scheme, the fast courts have been created. the ..... alone render judgment is not an absolute rule without exception. the code of criminal procedure under different justifiable circumstances permits a departure from its compliance. the provisions of section 407 cr.p.c., empowers this court to transfer the case from one court to another for different reasons and if it is expedient in the ends of ..... in crl.no.929/-01, set aside the order of transfer and restored to the file of ix addl. sessions judge, for disposal on the ground that under section 409 cr.p.c., the sessions judge has no power to transfer the part heard cases from the file of one sessions court to another. subsequently, the impugned .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Jharkhand
Decided on : Aug-12-2003
Reported in : 2005ACJ1605; AIR2004Jhar66; [2003(4)JCR695(Jhr)]
..... are entitled to get compensation from the government.9. in the instant case, it has been held in the foregoing paragraphs that the police, having not called explosive experts, acted in a manner which failed to protect the life of the deceased rajnish @ dablu. however, taking into consideration the fact that even the members of the police ..... members of the. family were dependent upon the income of the deceased rajnish kumar @ dablu. it has also been stated that rajnish died due to the bomb explosion.10. the aforementioned paragraphs 8, 9 and 10 have not been controverted by the respondents in their counter affidavit. all that they have said is recorded at paragraph ..... is stated that unaware of the contents of the parcel, the police party alongwith the son of the petitioner tried to open the parcel and in the subsequent explosion, the on of the petitioner was killed while the members of the police party suffered serious bomb blast injuries. the son of the petitioner himself volunteered to open .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Decided on : Sep-19-2003
Reported in : (2003)(158)ELT759Tri(Mum.)bai
..... to rs. 4,10,27,681/- by alleging that plot no. 48 and 49 are in fact one unit and explosives emerges at plot no. 48 and 49, as a result of application of section vi of the central excise tariff act. it was further stated that bmd vehicle cannot be treated as workshop, consequently exemption granted to goods manufactured in a workshop ..... .9.1994 to dec. 1996, by invoking the extended period of limitation in terms of section 11-a of the central excise act, besides the allegation of manufacture of explosives at plot no. 48 and 49, in view of note 2 to section vi of the central excise tariff act, revenue alleged that appellant had recovered the amount of central excise duty from the customer .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Decided on : Mar-11-2003
Reported in : (2003)(155)ELT91Tri(Mum.)bai
..... made for the extended period is hit by limitation. the following judgments witness this ruling - (1) the storage in three compartments of the ingredients necessary to manufacture prepared explosives in the same van did not amount to manufacture and that the provisions of rule 2(a) of the rules for interpretation of central excise tariff did not apply. ..... and could not fall under the ambit of the aforesaid rule. the belief of the commissioner that these three ingredients carried separately in the same van were prepared explosives incomplete or unprepared form has no substance and must be rejected.5. as the second argument before him the assessees claimed that the goods on final mixing at ..... to evade payment of duty. in the absence of any specific averment to this effect, the proviso to section 11a does not come into operation. no such allegation is made in the show cause notice at all. the act of not taking a licence is described as wilful but there is nothing to sustain the invocation of the .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT
Decided on : Jan-01-2003
Reported in : (2003)(159)ELT768Tri(Bang.)
..... rs. 47,11,087/- is not sustainable both on merits as well as on the issue of limitation. the assessee is manufacturing prepared explosives falling under chapter 36 of the central excise tariff act. they are also manufacturing spent nitric acid falling under tariff sub-heading 2808.10. they filed classification list and accordingly their products namely, ..... the period from december, 1991 to december, 1994. since such information was within the knowledge of the department there is no reason for invoking the proviso to section 11a.3. the commissioner took the view that the department had not made any further investigation into the explanation offered by the assessee namely that the alleged excess ..... fair or proper to reject its explanation. on the question of limitation also we find that the commissioner is fully justified in taking the view that proviso to section 11a cannot be invoked in the facts of the case. the show cause notice is dated 26-9-94. in the rt-12 returns filed by the .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Oct-08-2003
Reported in : AIR2004SC1344; 2003(3)ARBLR361(SC); JT2003(Suppl2)SC300; 2003(8)SCALE424; (2004)9SCC619; [2003]48SCL344(SC)
..... in kuju collieries ltd. v. jharknand mines ltd. and ors. : [1975]1scr703 this court held that in relation to a contract which is hit by section 23 of the contract act section 75 and section 70 of the contract act shall not apply. only in a case where a contract has become void due to subsequent happenings, the advantage gained by a person should be ..... one of three possible reasons would have imputed negligence to the shipowners. it was held by the house of lords that, since the charterers were unable to prove that the explosion was caused by the fault of the owners, the defence of frustration succeeded and the contract was discharged. it should perhaps be rioted that in many cases a self- ..... never explained. the rule is open to the objection that the charterer is much less likely than the owner to be able to show how the explosion occurred. this reasoning does, indeed, prevail in one group of cases: a person to whom goods have been bailed, and who seeks to rely on their destruction as a .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Jodhpur
Decided on : Dec-18-2003
Reported in : (2004)84TTJ(Jodh.)337
..... , the resultant assessed income was at a loss of rs. 96,776 (sic). the ao noted that search under section 132 of the act was conducted in october, 1987 at the residence of the assessee and in his statement the assessee stated that the explosives purchased at rs. 1,73,107 on 27th july, 1987 and rs. 1,49,488 on 24th aug ..... the income which he noted at rs. 3,22,587 in the form of unrecorded purchases. the ao, therefore, levied penalty of rs, 1,47,574 under section 271(1)(c) of the it act being 100 per cent of the tax sought to be evaded.4.2 aggrieved, the assessee carried the matter in appeal before the cit(a) and submitted that ..... the assessee that the entries were made on the basis of the payment. it is also seen that the amendment had been made in expln. 4 to section 271(1)(c) by the finance act. (no. 2) w.e.f. 1st april, 2003 and it has been inserted that : "in any case where the amount of income in respect of which particulars .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Mumbai
Decided on : Mar-05-2003
Reported in : 2003BomCR(Cri)1727; 2003CriLJ2994
..... : 1) he intended to threaten the unity, integrity, security or sovereignty of india, 2) he intended to strike terror in the people, 3) any section of people does any act or thing by using bombs, dynamites or other explosive substances or inflammable substances or firearms or other lethal weapons or poisons or noxious gases or other chemicals or by any other substances (whether ..... ) whoever - (a) with intent to threaten the unity, integrity, security or sovereignty of india or to strike terror in the people or any section of the people does any act or thing by using bombs, dynamite or other explosive substances or inflammable substances or firearms or other lethal weapons or poisons or noxious gases or other chemicals or by any other substances (whether .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chennai
Decided on : Dec-18-2003
Reported in : 2004(1)CTC721
..... one paranthaman, who is being tried for the offences under sec. 21(1)(a) and sec. 21(3) of pota read with sec. 13(1)(b) of unlawful activities (prevention) act, 1967 as also sec. 4(b)(1) and sec. 5(a) of the explosives substances act 1908 and sec.17(1) of the criminal law amendment act 1908. 2. learned counsel for the appellant in this ..... happened to this case, which is pending for the last ten years. the second prosecution is vide p.s. crime no.1988 of 1993 under sec. 10 of the unlawful activities (prevention) act on account of the seizure of 298 copies of 'kaviayanayagan kittu', a book on the ltte leader by name kittu, allegedly written by pala nedumaran himself ..... assisted in arranging the said indoor meeting which knew was to support the terrorist organisation ltte and hence had committed the offence under sec. 21(2) pota, punishable under sec. 21(4) of the said act.7. it is then further suggested in the charge-sheet that a-1 pala neduamaran had participated in a public meeting held on .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Orissa
Decided on : Aug-28-2003
Reported in : 2004(I)OLR70
..... including the appellant were arrested who faced their trial for alleged commission of offences under sections 457/398/216-a of indian and penal code besides section 9-b(b) of the indian explosive substances act and section 27 of the indian arms act. the learned trial court found all the accused persons not guilty of the offences under ..... sections 457/395/216-a of ipc and also section 9-b(b) of the indian explosive substance act and section 27 of the indian arms act and acquitted ..... them of the said charges. however, the trial court found the appellant guilty under section 412 ipc and convicted and sentenced him .....
Tag this Judgment!