Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: explosives act 1884 section 4 definitions Year: 1973 Page 95 of about 961 results (0.185 seconds)

M/S. Binani Bros. (P) Ltd. Vs. Union of India and ors. M/S. Pragdas Ma ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : (1974)3CTR(SC)18

..... these goods being diverted by the assessee for any other purpose. consequently we hold that the sales took place in the course of import of goods within sec. 5(2) of the act, and are, therefore, exempt from taxation.'as already stated, there was to be an inspection of the goods in belgium by the representative of the dgs ..... import before the sixth amendment of the constitution. by that amendment, parliament was given power to formulate the principles for construing the expression. and in, sec. 5(2) of the central sales tax act, 1956, parliament has given a legislative meaning of the expression :'5(2) a sale or purchase of goods shall be deemed to take place ..... manufactured in belgium by their principal occasioned the movement of goods in course of import and sales-tax was not exigible on the transaction in view of sec. 5(2) of the central sales-tax act, 1956. on the basis of this judgment, respondent no. 2 issued an order (annexure p-1) to all the authorities concerned including respondent .....

Nlrb Vs. Savair Mfg. Co.

Court : US Supreme Court

..... (b). there is no explicit provision which makes "interference" by a union with the right of an employee to "refrain" from union activities an unfair labor practice. section 8(c), however, provides: "the expressing of any views, argument, or opinion, or the dissemination thereof, whether, in written, printed, graphic, or visual form ..... with such regulations as may be prescribed by the board --" "(a) by an employee or group of employees or any individual or labor organization acting in their behalf alleging that a substantial number of employees (i) wish to be represented for collective bargaining and that their employer declines to recognize their ..... conducted an election by secret ballot among the production and maintenance employees of respondent at the request of the mechanics educational society of america (hereafter union). under the act, [ footnote 2 ] the union, if it wins the election, becomes "the exclusive representative of all the employees" in that particular unit for purposes of .....

Weinberger Vs. Hynson, Wescott and Dunning, Inc.

Court : US Supreme Court

..... footnote 25 ] hynson also argues that lutrexin is exempt by operation of 107(c)(2), which provides: "an application filed pursuant to section 505(b) of the basic act which was 'effective' within the meaning of that act on the day immediately preceding the enactment date shall be deemed, as of the enactment date, to be an application 'approved' by the ..... and must await the outcome of this hearing. finally, we cannot agree with hynson that lutrexin is exempt from the provisions of the act by virtue of 107(c)(4) of the 1962 amendments. that section provides that no drug will be treated as a "new drug" if, on the day preceding the adoption of the amendments, the drug ..... or sold in the united states, (b) was not a new drug as defined by section 201(p) of the basic act as then in force, and (c) was not covered by an effective application under section 505 of that act. . . ." the applicability of this section turns solely on whether lutrexin was "covered" by an effective nda immediately prior to the .....

United States Vs. Bishop

Court : US Supreme Court

..... convicted of violating the antecedent of 7201, namely, 145(b) of the 1939 code, a felony statute identical, for present purposes, with the section of the same number in the revenue act of 1936 at issue in spies. the defendant claimed that he was entitled to a lesser included offense instruction based on 3616(a) of the 1939 ..... of the internal revenue code of 1954, as amended, 26 u.s.c. 7201-7241, is concerned with tax crimes. sections 7201-7207, inclusive, which in the aggregate relate to attempts to evade or defeat tax, to failures to act, and to fraud, all include the word "willfully" in their respective contexts. specifically, 7206 is a felony statute, and ..... code, the antecedent of 7207. the court rejected this contention, concluding that the two sections of the 1939 code then "covered precisely the same ground." .....

Mcdonnell Douglas Corp. Vs. Green

Court : US Supreme Court

..... his compensation, terms, conditions, or privileges of employment, because of such individual's race, color, religion, sex, or national origin. . . ." section 704(a) of the civil rights act of 1964, 42 u.s.c. 2000e-3(a), in pertinent part provides: "it shall be an unlawful employment practice for an employer to discriminate ..... 's admitted participation in the unlawful "stall-in," we find it unnecessary to resolve the contradictory contentions surrounding this "lock-in." [ footnote 4 ] section 703(a)(1) of the civil rights act of 1964, 42 u.s.c. 2000e-2(a)(1), in pertinent part provides: "it shall be an unlawful employment practice for an employer . ..... an applicant or employee on account of his participation in legitimate civil rights activities or protests, while the latter section deals with the broader and centrally page 411 u. s. 800 important question under the act of whether, for any reason, a racially discriminatory employment decision has been made. moreover, respondent should have .....

Kern County Land Co. Vs. Occidental Petr. Corp.

Court : US Supreme Court

..... 1969); note, reliance electric and 16(b) litigation: a return to the objective approach?, 58 va.l.rev. 907 (1972); gadsby & treadway, recent developments under section 16(b) of the securities exchange act of 1934, 17 n.y.l.f. 687 (1971). [ footnote 27 ] our differences with the dissent as to the reach and scope of congressional intent and ..... difficult to perceive any speculative value to occidental if the stock declined and tenneco chose not to exercise its option. see generally note, put and call options under section 16 of the securities exchange act, 69 yale l.j. 868 (1960); h. filer, understanding put and call options 96-111 (1959); g. leffler, the stock market 363-378 ( ..... filed a dissenting opinion, in which brennan and stewart, jj., joined, post, p. 411 u. s. 605 . mr. justice white delivered the opinion of the court. section 16(b) of the securities exchange act of 1934, 48 stat. 896, 15 u.s.c. 78p(b), [ footnote 1 ] provides that officers, page 411 u. s. 584 directors, and holders of .....

Braden Vs. 30th Judicial Circuit Court of Kentucky

Court : US Supreme Court

..... . within their respective jurisdictions " (emphasis supplied), precluded the district court from page 410 u. s. 486 entertaining petitioner's application. the district court held that the section did not bar its determination of the application. the court held further that petitioner had been denied a speedy trial, and ordered respondent either to secure his presence in kentucky ..... island, new york, pending deportation sought habeas corpus on the principal ground that the removal orders exceeded the president's statutory authority under the alien enemy act of 1798. page 410 u. s. 496 they filed their petitions in the district court for the district of columbia, naming as respondent the attorney ..... u.s.c. 2255; s.rep. no. 1502, 89th cong., 2d sess., 2 (1966), discussing 28 u.s.c. 2241(d); uniform post-conviction procedure act 3; american bar association project on standards for criminal justice, post-conviction remedies 1.4, p. 28 (approved draft 1968); note, developments in the law -- federal .....

United States Vs. Falstaff Brewing Corp.

Court : US Supreme Court

..... merging firm, the celler-kefauver amendment reached cases where future or potential competition in the entire relevant market might be adversely affected by the merger. [ footnote 3/12 ] "section 7 of the clayton act was intended to arrest the anticompetitive effects of market power in their incipiency. the core question is whether a merger may substantially lessen competition, and necessarily requires a ..... that the government had failed to establish that the acquisition would result in a substantial lessening of competition, the district court entered judgment for falstaff and dismissed the complaint. i section 7 of the clayton act forbids mergers in any line of commerce where the effect may be substantially to lessen competition or tend to create a monopoly. the .....

Epa Vs. Mink

Court : US Supreme Court

..... interest' is made both to delimit more narrowly the exception and to give it a more precise definition. the phrase 'public interest' in section 3(a) of the administrative procedure act has been subject page 410 u. s. 82 to conflicting interpretations, often colored by personal prejudices and predilections. it admits of no clear ..... [t]his official information or material, referred to as classified information or material in this order, is expressly exempted from public disclosure by section 552(b)(1) of [the freedom of information act]." (emphasis added.) thus, the executive clearly recognized that exemption 1 applies only to matter specifically classified "in the interest of the national ..... , but nonetheless under the umbrella of a "secret" file, the district court should make sure that it is disclosed under the act. this seems clear from 552(b), which states: "this section does not apply to matters that are -- (1) specifically required by executive order to be kept secret in the interest of .....

Hughes Tool Co. Vs. Trans World Airlines, Inc.

Court : US Supreme Court

..... transaction "which would result in creating a monopoly or monopolies and thereby restrain competition or jeopardize another air carrier" not a party to the transaction. section 102 of the act requires that, in assessing the public interest and the public convenience and necessity, the board should consider, among other things, "[c]ompetition to the ..... with our duty "to make the [regulatory scheme] work." silver v. new york stock exchange, 373 u.s. at 373 u. s. 357 . section 408 of the act has now been amended to require board approval when any person, whether or not engaged in any aspect of aeronautics, acquires a controlling interest in an air ..... of that control to determine how the air carrier acquires aircraft and the necessary financing therefor immunized from the operation of the antitrust laws under section 414 of the federal aviation act?" [ footnote 2/10 ] it is not unreasonable to assume that the battalions of lawyers for these adversaries devoted substantially the same effort and .....