Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: explosives act 1884 section 4 definitions Year: 1973 Page 92 of about 961 results (0.171 seconds)

Jan 12 1973 (HC)

Santosh Saha Vs. State and anr.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Jan-12-1973

Reported in : 1973CriLJ968

..... of the words, in the statute one has to refer in the first instance to the definition thereof. the word 'person' as denned in section 3(42) of the general clauses act (act x of 1897) includes any company or association or body of individuals, whether incorporated or not; a_nd the same is also the definition given ..... of lt. commander pascal fernandas v. state of maharashtra reported in : 1968crilj550 . the decision is in the context of section 8(21 of the criminal law amendment act, 1952 but the provisions thereof are similar to those of section 337(1) of thp criminal procedure code, m. hfidayatulla, j. (as his lordship then was) delivering the -judgment of ..... parliament is that they should be construed according to the intent of the parliament which passed the act'. i respectfully agree and applied the said principles for a correct interpretation of the words 'any person' contained in section 337(1) of the code of criminal procedure. the principles of interpretation of statutes also rule out .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 16 1973 (HC)

Raja Katra Vs. Corporation of Calcutta

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Feb-16-1973

Reported in : 1973CriLJ1505

..... private individual without a license from the corporation. that being so, a prosecution for keeping open such a private market is maintainable under section 451 read with section 537 of the act.the division bench further proceeded to observe thatto say that the owner of a private market can never be prosecuted because his market has ..... . corpn. of calcutta : 1967crilj950 . chief lustice r. subba rao delivering the majority judgment clearly made a distinction between fines realised under section 541 and under section 537 of the west bengal act xxxiii of 1951. the first going over to the corporation while the other being leviable to the state. this marked distinction is a pointer ..... defence case, inter alia, is that the prosecution case is not maintainable; that it is barred by limitation; that no declaration as required under section 5 (42) of the act was made; that no opportunity was afforded to the accused before the alleged declaration; that there has been no proper delegation on the part of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 05 1973 (FN)

Falk Vs. Brennan

Court : US Supreme Court

Decided on : Dec-05-1973

..... f's gross receipts must include amounts paid by the building owner to cover operation and maintenance costs, plus the amount paid as commissions. [ footnote 2/1 ] section 3(r) of the act, 29 u.s.c. 203(r), defines "enterprise" to mean: "the related activities performed (either through unified operation or common control) by any person or ..... with respect to calculating the annual dollar volume of sales in retail and service establishments, and in laundries under the exemptions provided in section 13(a)(2), (3), (4), and (13) of the act. the procedure for making the calculation is set forth in the department's interpretative bulletin [pertaining to retailers of goods and services]. ..... in commerce," 75 stat. 67, 69. but not every enterprise meeting the statutory definition in 3(r) of the act was brought within the act's coverage. section 3(s)(1) prescribed a dollar volume test that limited the act's coverage to those enterprises that had an "annual gross volume of sales of . . . not less than $1 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 19 1973 (FN)

Kusper Vs. Pontikes

Court : US Supreme Court

Decided on : Nov-19-1973

..... entitlement, including both persons disqualified under the 23-month rule challenged in this case and persons disqualified because they refuse to declare a party affiliation. [ footnote 2/1 ] section 7-44 requires page 414 u. s. 67 a primary voter to declare his party affiliation to the primary judges at the polling place; it further provides that, if ..... he seeks to participate is held." "(e) in cities, villages and incorporated towns having a board of election commissioners only voters registered as provided by article 6 of this act shall be entitled to vote at such primary." "(f) no person shall be entitled to vote at a primary unless he is registered under the provisions of article 4 ..... , 5 or 6 of this act, when his registration is required by any of said articles to entitle him to vote at the election with reference to which the primary is held." [ footnote 2/2 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 04 1973 (FN)

United States Vs. Chicago, B. and Q. R. Co.

Court : US Supreme Court

Decided on : Jun-04-1973

..... fact, enlarge the railroad's working capital, were used in its business, and produced economic benefits for it, thereby qualifying as contributions to its capital under the cited section of the 1939 code. the three dissenting judges disagreed with this interpretation of brown shoe, and, instead, relied on detroit edison co. v. commissioner, 319 u. ..... of service facilities (primary power lines) that the utility otherwise was not obligated to provide. for its tax years 1936 and 1937, to which the revenue act of 1936, 49 stat. 1648, applied, the utility claimed the full cost of the facilities in its base for computing depreciation. the commissioner disallowed, for depreciation ..... value now sought to be depreciated, and they page 412 u. s. 415 were presumably considered in computing the railroad's maximum 10% liability under the act. in our view, no substantial incremental benefit in terms of the production of income was foreseeable or taken into consideration at the time the facilities were .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 27 1973 (FN)

Mescalero Apache Tribe Vs. Jones

Court : US Supreme Court

Decided on : Mar-27-1973

..... much to tribal ski resorts as it does to fishing enterprises. see organized village of kake, supra. the enabling act for new mexico, 36 stat. 557, [ footnote 4 ] reflects the distinction between on- and off-reservation activities. section 2 of the act provides that the people of the state disclaim "all right and title" to lands "owned or held by ..... there remains to be considered the scope of the immunity specifically afforded by 5 of the indian reorganization act. 25 u.s.c. 465. a section 465 provides, in part, that "any lands or rights acquired" pursuant to any provision of the act "shall be taken in the name of the united states in trust for the indian tribe or ..... be taxed by the state without the consent of congress. congress, by 5 of the act, has made the "lands or rights" acquired for the tribe exempt from state and local taxation. section 5, indeed, states that "lands or rights" acquired under the 1934 act shall be held "in trust for the indian tribe or individual indian for which the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 27 1973 (FN)

United States Vs. Basye

Court : US Supreme Court

Decided on : Feb-27-1973

..... permanente] for medical services to be provided by [permanente] hereunder, [kaiser] shall pay to [permanente] the amounts specified in this article h." " * * * *" " section h-4. provision for savings and retirement program for physicians. " "in the event that [permanente] establishes a savings and retirement plan or other deferred compensation plan approved by [ ..... for a close comparison of the present differences, see grayck, tax qualified retirement plans for professional practitioners: a comparison of the self-employed individuals tax requirement act of 1962 and the professional association, 63 col.l.rev. 415 (1963); note, federal tax policy and retirement benefits -- a new approach, 59 ..... establishing the contemplated page 410 u. s. 444 plan soon was executed by permanente, kaiser, and the bank of america trust and savings association, acting as trustee. under this agreement, kaiser agreed to make payments to the trust at a predetermined rate, initially pegged at 12 cents per health plan .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 26 1973 (HC)

A. S. Muthiah and ors. Vs. Peter Nadar and ors.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Nov-26-1973

Reported in : (1974)2MLJ404

..... passing observation as stated above. i do not think the contention of thiru parasaran as if the rule of estoppel will be available only in cases where section 43, transfer of property act, can be invoked, is made as a proposition of law for all types of cases. the observations of the supreme court made in that decision is ..... thiru parasaran submitted that unless section 43, transfer of property act comes into play, a party cannot sustain his claim or right on a mere rule of estoppel. in that case,, the plaintiff who filed the suit ..... available to the defendants in view of the following observations therein:besides estoppel is but a rule of evidence and except in cases like those under section 43 of the transfer of property act, when a grant is fed by estoppel, the rule does not operate to create interest in property regarding which the representation is made.on this, .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 18 1973 (HC)

Chennammal Vs. the Commissioner, for Hindu Religious and Charitable En ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jul-18-1973

Reported in : (1973)2MLJ442

..... order can be said to be conclusive. as we have pointed out already, that order was passed on a petition presented by mallappa chettiat purporting to be one under section 84 of act ii of 1927. in the view we have taken as to the binding nature of that order on the appellant herein, we are not expressing any opinion as ..... are to be bound by this judgment, all the trustees are necessary parties.therefore, the position is well settled that in order to make an order passed under section 84 of madras act ii of 1927 binding on the institution, the entire body of trustees administering the institution as well as the properties should be made parties and that, in the ..... question that has to be considered is whether there is evidence to show that the suit temple is a public temple. a temple has been defined in madras act xxii of 1959 in section 6 (20). according to this definition,temple means a place by whatever designation known used as a place of public religious worship, and dedicated to, or for .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 21 1973 (FN)

New York Dept. of Soc. Svcs. Vs. Dublino

Court : US Supreme Court

Decided on : Jun-21-1973

..... of helping afdc recipients return to gainful employment. we do not resolve, however, the question of whether some particular sections of the work rules might contravene the specific provisions of the federal social security act. this last question we remand to the court below. that court did not have the opportunity to consider the ..... case for federal preemption is not persuasive. pp. 413 u. s. 421 -422. 2. the question of whether some particular sections of the work rules might contravene the specific provisions of the social security act is not resolved, but is remanded to the district court for consideration. pp. 413 u. s. 422 423. 348 f.supp ..... the class of persons eligible for assistance. [ footnote 2/5 ] appellants argue that "the provision of section 602(a)(10) that aid be furnished 'to all eligible individuals,' when read within the context of the social security act, means individuals 'eligible' under state requirements, not federal." reply brief for appellant n.y. state depts. .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //