Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: explosives act 1884 section 4 definitions Sorted by: recent Year: 2003 Page 94 of about 4,629 results (0.157 seconds)

Panjabrao Sadashiorao Wankhede Vs. Rajeev Agrawal, Secretary, Ministry ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2004(3)ALLMR472; 2004(4)BomCR430; 2004(2)MhLj1047

..... contempt, the person charged is described as an accused. in the matter of punishment the distinction which the contempt of courts act, 1971 draws in sub-section (3) of section 12 is as follows :--'notwithstanding anything contained in this section, where a person is found guilty of a civil contempt, the court, if it considers that a fine will not ..... in any other manner. 8. however, a civil or a criminal contempt is punishable in the same manner. section 12(1) reads as follows :'12. punishment for contempt of court -- (1) save as otherwise expressly provided in this act or in any other law, a contempt of court may be punished with simple imprisonment for a term which ..... government pleader referred to rule 17 framed by this court under section 23 of contempt of courts act, which confers the power of this court to frame rules. rule 17 of the contempt of courts act (bombay high court rules): 'the orders passed in the proceedings under the act shall be carried out, enforced and executed as if they .....

Lochan Prasad Vs. Executive Engineer, Public Works Department Rashtriy ...

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : 2004(1)AWC403

..... than 240 days in a year that he was denied duty by the respondent orally w.e.f. 26.1.1993 without complying with the provisions of section 6n of the industrial disputes act, 1947.4. the petitioner raised an industrial dispute before the regional conciliation officer, bareilly alleging illegal termination of service which was registered as c.p. ..... the argument to the contrary.7. in so far as the contention of the petitioner that he was a daily wager and not a workman under section 2 (s) of the industrial disputes act, 1947, the labour court has given a finding of fact based on the evidence of the workman that the workman had not been given any ..... appointed against a sanctioned post in substantive vacancy. engagement for 240 days from time to time on daily wage would not attract the provision of section 6n of the u. p. industrial disputes act unless it could established that he had continuously worked for 240 days in previous year counting backward from the date of termination of service and .....

itel Industries Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex.

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT

Reported in : (2004)(93)ECC639

..... on the appellants. in appeal, the commissioner (appeals) framed issue as to whether clearance of telephone instruments to dot/mtnl should be assessed under section 4a or under section 4 of the central excise act, 1944. the commissioner (appeals) had recorded the oral submission and reiterated the allegation that the appellant had availed 40% from the contract price, which ..... short point to be considered in the appeal filed by the assessee is whether clearances of telephone instruments to dot/mtnl should be governed under section 4 or under section 4a of the central excise act, 1944 while determining the assessable value.12. the central board of excise has issued a circular no.625/16/2002-cx., dtd. 28- ..... it is open to the revenue to contend before this tribunal for a position that the assessment has to be made in the case of party under section 4a of the act. it was further contended that the circular, which came only on 28-2-2002, can be relied on by the assessee in order to justify his .....

Sebi Vs. Doogar and Associate Securities

Court : SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT

..... regulation 1992, while in the show cause notice, besides alleging violation of the said regulations, the sebi has increased the jurisdiction by alleging that dasl has violated section 12 of the sebi act and rule 3 of sebi (stock brokers and sub-brokers) rules, also. 3. the enquiry report was liable to be quashed and no penalty as proposed ..... has questioned the legality of the abovementioned circular. however, it is to be noted that all circulars are issued by sebi by invoking its powers under section 11 of the sebi act which confers upon it the power to adopt such measures as it thinks fit for the regulation of the securities market. hence as these circulars derive their ..... as a sub-broker without obtaining a certificate of registration and functioning as such, has violated the provisions of the above mentioned circular and the provisions of section 12 of the sebi act, 1992 and rule 3 of the rules as well as the provisions of para c(4) of the code of conduct of sub-brokers specified under .....

Vijayakumar Vs. State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

Reported in : 2004(2)KLT627

..... third respondent reached the college and averted untoward incidents. based on the incident on 16th july 2003, crime no. 244 of 2003 was registered against respondents 5 to 8 under sections 342, 506(i), 427 and 34 i.p.c. it is stated that the third respondent was a witness to the abuse of the principal by the students in ..... . respondents 5 to 9 are students of the college and respondent no. 10 is a former student of the college.2. according to the averments in the petition a section of the students has been creating disturbance to the smooth running of the college. respondents 5 to 10 have been organising strike and violent activities inside the college premises. they ..... and released on bail and crime no. 237 of 2003 was registered by the additional sub inspector of police, pandalam on 11th july 2003 under sections 143, 147, 342, 506(i), 294(b) read with section 149 i.p.c. against respondents 5,6 and 10. on getting report about the incident of harassment of the petitioner by the students on .....

Sri Buvaneswari Graph Paper Rep. by Its Proprietrix Smt. Sharadambal, ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (2004)1MLJ311

..... `the explanation given by the state government for not furnishing the full court fee on the first date of filing the appeal is far from satisfactory', have rejected the section 5 limitation act petition and also the memo. of appeal filed by the state government.7. on such arguments, the learned counsel for the petitioners would pray to allow both the ..... the appeal papers and that the court below, as per its order dated 22.11.2000, has allowed both the said petitions, the first petition filed under section 5 of the limitation act remarking that the delay of three days caused in preferring the appeal was neither wilful nor wanton nor even deliberate and though the delay of three days has ..... known that since there was delay in preferring the appeal, the respondent herein has filed two petitions, the first one in c.m.p. no. 448 of 2000 under section 5 of the limitation act praying to condone the delay of three days in preferring the appeal and the second petition in c.m.p. no. 449 of 2000 under .....

K.K. Swaminathan Vs. Srinivasagam

Court : Chennai

Reported in : I(2004)BC492; (2003)3MLJ566

..... . the learned counsel for the revision petitioner has relied upon : air1995sc1440 in support of his contention that it is always open to the plaintiff to invoke section 44 of evidence act to set aside the earlier decree even if it is a contested one. : air1995sc1440 refers to the suit filed by the minor plaintiff represented by the ..... where is the question of fraud, that too, actual positive fraud played against the revision petitioner absolutely there could be none. 24. what is contemplated under section 44 of indian evidence act is 'actual positive fraud'. in this regard, we may usefully refer to the following passage in sarkar's law of evidence, 14th edition page no. 763 ..... respondent has filed the counter statement referring to the filing of similar application in i.a. no. 110/1987 in o.s. no. 352/1986 under section 73 of indian evidence act. i.a. no. 110/1987 was dismissed. against which, the revision petitioner had not preferred any appeal or revision before the high court and the .....

Chief Engineer and ors. Vs. Pancham Ram and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : 2004(1)AWC81

..... 10.1997 copy of which is annexure-14 to the stay application in the special appeal. an f.i.r, was filed against the superintending engineer and one stenographer under section 409, i.p.c. copy of which is annexure-15 to the stay application in the special appeal. it is alleged that the head office was conscious about the ..... writ petitioners, whose details have already been given above. in such a situation all that was required of the authority before cancelling the selection and appointment was that it should act in a fair and bona fide manner. that was done in this case. in our opinion it was not necessary in such circumstances to further insist that opportunity of ..... process it is not necessary to give opportunity of hearing to the selected candidates. all that is expected of the competent authority in such a situation is that it should act in good faith, and take a bona fide decision whether to scrap the recruitment or not.26. in the present case, we have already held that there were grave .....

Sterlite Optical Technologies Vs. Commissioner of Cen. Excise and

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Reported in : (2004)(165)ELT467Tri(Mum.)bai

..... 56.832%. the commissioner has rejected the claim of the company that the rate of duty payable and which has been paid is only 16% ced under section 3(1) of the central excise act. he has also rejected the plea of the manufacturer that the benefit of concessional rate of duty at the rate of 5% for optical fibre which is ..... 9913kgs of preforms manufactured in the 100% eou unit and cleared clandestinely to dta unit. all the above demands have been confirmed together with interest in terms of section 11ab of the central excise act, 1944 and extended period of limitation has been invoked in the case of the above 3 demands. (4). customs duty of rs. 6,93,81,856/- on ..... terms of notification no. 53/97-cus (5) penalty of rs. 94,87,92,689/- on the 100% eou unit under section 11ac of the central excise act, and penalty of rs. one crore fifty lakhs under section 112(a) of the customs act on the 100 % eou unit. (6) penalty of rs. 10 crores & rs. 75 lakhs on shri navin agarwal, director of .....

S. Pancharatnam Vs. the Tamil Nadu Electricity Regulatory Commission R ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (2004)1MLJ9

..... , organisations/bodies of such interested groups, representing the above mentioned sectors are also required.4.8. a reading of regulations 5 and 6, into section 37 of the act, makes it clear that the procedure of constituting advisory committee, selection of the members, and the report of the same shall be transparent, otherwise, ..... 21 members (not including ex-officio members) with a view to reflect a balance of various interest groups in state energy sector as outlined in section 24(2) of the act. preference is to be given to the representatives with a significant understanding of the power sector and contribution from the following sectors, viz. commerce ..... to mr. k. chandru, learned senior counsel appearing for the petitioner, the appointment of the second respondent is contrary to section 37 of the electricity regulatory commissions act (hereinafter referred to as the 'act') for want of transparency in the impugned appointment and is also in violation to regulation 5 and 6 of the state .....